Illumination system of a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus
US-9213244-B2 · Dec 15, 2015 · US
US9946161B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9946161-B2 |
| Application number | US-201213660146-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 25, 2012 |
| Priority date | May 27, 2010 |
| Publication date | Apr 17, 2018 |
| Grant date | Apr 17, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An optical system for a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus and a microlithographic exposure method are disclosed. In an embodiment an optical system for a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus includes at least one mirror arrangement having a plurality of mirror elements which are displaceable independently of each other for altering an angular distribution of the light reflected by the mirror arrangement. The optical system also includes at least one manipulator downstream of the mirror arrangement in the light propagation direction. The manipulator has a raster arrangement of manipulator elements so that light incident on the manipulator during operation of the optical system is influenced differently in its polarization state and/or in its intensity in dependence on the incidence location.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. An optical system having a pupil plane, the optical system comprising: a mirror arrangement comprising a plurality of mirror elements which are displaceable independently of each other to alter an angular distribution of light reflected by the mirror arrangement during use of the optical system; and a manipulator downstream of the mirror arrangement along a light propagation path through the optical system, the manipulator comprising a raster arrangement of manipulator elements configured so that light interacting with the manipulator during use of the optical system is influenced differently in its polarization state and/or in its intensity depending on an incidence location of the light on the manipulator, wherein: when the mirror elements are arranged in a first configuration, light reflected by the mirror arrangement results in a first illumination setting in the pupil plane; when the mirror elements are arranged in a second configuration, light reflected by the mirror arrangement results in a second illumination setting in the pupil plane; the first and second illumination settings illuminate identical regions of the pupil plane; a polarization state of the light in the pupil plane in the first illumination setting is different from a polarization state of the light in the pupil plane in the second illumination setting; the raster arrangement of manipulator elements has an arrangement of regions which differently influence the polarization state and/or the intensity of light that interacts with the manipulator elements; the arrangement of regions alternates periodically in two perpendicular spatial directions; a period length of the periodically alternating arrangement in a given spatial direction corresponds to a period length of the mirror arrangement in that spatial direction or to an integral multiple of the period length in that spatial direction; and the optical system is configured to be used in a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus. 2. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein a maximum extent of the manipulator elements in one of the two perpendicular spatial directions is at most one tenth of a maximum extent of the optically usable area of the manipulator in that spatial direction. 3. The optical system of claim 2 , wherein the mirror arrangement is at a first position of the optical system, the manipulator is at a second position of the optical system, and a paraxial subaperture ratio of the first position differs from a paraxial subaperture ratio of the second position by at most 0.15. 4. The optical system of claim 2 , wherein the mirror arrangement is at a position in the optical system having a paraxial subaperture ratio greater than 0.8, and/or the manipulator is arranged at a position in the optical system having a paraxial subaperture ratio greater than 0.8. 5. The optical system of claim 2 , wherein the mirror arrangement is at a position in the optical system having a paraxial subaperture ratio less than 0.3, and/or the manipulator is arranged at a position in the optical system having a paraxial subaperture ratio less than 0.3. 6. The optical system of claim 2 , further comprising a second mirror arrangement comprising a plurality of mirror elements displaceable independently of each to alter an angular distribution of the light reflected by the second mirror arrangement, wherein the manipulator is between the mirror arrangements along the light propagation path. 7. The optical system of claim 2 , wherein, during use of the optical system, mutually adjacent manipulator elements produce mutually orthogonal polarization states for light that interacts with the manipulator. 8. The optical system of claim 2 , wherein the manipulator elements are configured so that the manipulator elements mutually cancel each other in their influence on the polarization state when the entire optically usable area of the manipulator is illuminated during use of the optical system. 9. The optical system of claim 2 , wherein at least two mutually different illumination settings are adjustable by varying an angular distribution of the light reflected by the mirror arrangement. 10. The optical system of claim 2 , further comprising an actuation unit to actuate a displacement of the mirror elements. 11. The optical system of claim 2 , wherein at least two different dipole illumination settings are adjustable with mutually orthogonal polarization states. 12. The optical system of claim 2 , wherein at least one illumination setting is adjustable with an at least approximately tangential polarization distribution or an at least approximately radial polarization distribution. 13. The optical system of claim 2 , wherein the manipulator elements comprise gray filters. 14. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein the mirror arrangement is at a first position of the optical system, the manipulator is at a second position of the optical system, and a paraxial subaperture ratio of the first position differs from a paraxial subaperture ratio of the second position by at most 0.15. 15. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein the mirror arrangement is at a position in the optical system having a paraxial subaperture ratio greater than 0.8, and/or the manipulator is arranged at a position in the optical system having a paraxial subaperture ratio greater than 0.8. 16. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein the mirror arrangement is at a position in the optical system having a paraxial subaperture ratio less than 0.3, and/or the manipulator is arranged at a position in the optical system having a paraxial subaperture ratio less than 0.3. 17. The optical system of claim 1 , further comprising a second mirror arrangement comprising a plurality of mirror elements displaceable independently of each to alter an angular distribution of the light reflected by the second mirror arrangement, wherein the manipulator is between the mirror arrangements along the light propagation path. 18. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein, during use of the optical system, mutually adjacent manipulator elements produce mutually orthogonal polarization states for light that interacts with the manipulator. 19. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein the manipulator elements are configured so that the manipulator elements mutually cancel each other in their influence on the polarization state when the entire optically usable area of the manipulator is illuminated during use of the optical system. 20. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein at least two mutually different illumination settings are adjustable by varying an angular distribution of the light reflected by the mirror arrangement. 21. The optical system of claim 1 , further comprising an actuation unit to actuate a displacement of the mirror elements. 22. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein at least two different dipole illumination settings are adjustable with mutually orthogonal polarization states. 23. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein at least one illumination setting is adjustable with an at least approximately tangential polarization distribution or an at least approximately radial polarization distribution. 24. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein the manipulator elements comprise gray filters. 25. The optical system of claim 1 , wherein at least some of the manipulator elements have a different reflectivity for the light or a different tr
Polarisation control · CPC title
Off-axis setting using a programmable means, e.g. liquid crystal display [LCD], digital micromirror device [DMD] or pupil facets · CPC title
Processing photosensitive materials; Apparatus therefor (G03F7/12 - G03F7/24 take precedence) · CPC title
Exposure; Apparatus therefor (photographic printing apparatus for making copies G03B27/00) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.