Configuring signal-processing systems
US-2015332785-A1 · Nov 19, 2015 · US
US9760665B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9760665-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514833069-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 22, 2015 |
| Priority date | Jul 7, 2015 |
| Publication date | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Grant date | Sep 12, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An approach is provided in which an information handling system executes multiple timing constraint sensitivity tests on a circuit model using a first signal arrival time and generates multiple test results. The information handling system compares the multiple test results with a pre-determined probability threshold and, in response to determining that an amount of test failures included in the multiple test results meets a pre-determined failure probability threshold, the information handling system computes a timing constraint sensitivity of the circuit model based upon the first signal arrival time. The information handling system compares the timing constraint sensitivity against a characterized sensitivity generated by a software modeling system and, when the timing constraint sensitivity does not match the characterized sensitivity, one or more of the software modeling system's modeling parameters are adjusted, causing the software modeling system to generate a changed characterized sensitivity of the circuit model.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method implemented by an information handling system that includes a memory and a processor, the method comprising: executing a plurality of first sensitivity tests on a circuit model using a first signal arrival time value, the executing resulting in a plurality of first test results; adjusting the first signal arrival time value to a second signal arrival time value in response to determining that the plurality of first test results do not meet a pre-determined probability threshold; executing a plurality of second sensitivity tests on the circuit model using the second signal arrival time value, the executing resulting in a plurality of second test results; in response to determining that the plurality of second test results meets the pre-determined probability threshold, computing a timing constraint sensitivity utilizing the second signal arrival time value; determining whether the timing constraint sensitivity is within a pre-defined tolerance of a characterized sensitivity of the circuit model, wherein the characterized sensitivity was generated by a software modeling system during library characterization of the circuit model; and adjusting one or more modeling parameters of the software modeling system based upon the determining, wherein the software modeling system generates a changed characterized sensitivity of the circuit model using the adjusted one or more modeling parameters. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of sensitivity tests correspond to a setup test, and wherein the method further comprises: wherein the first signal arrival time value is longer than the second signal arrival time value; and decreasing the first signal arrival time value to the second signal arrival time value in response to determining that the plurality of first test results include an amount of test failures that is greater than the pre-determined probability threshold. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of sensitivity tests correspond to a setup test, and wherein the method further comprises: wherein the first signal arrival time value is shorter than the second signal arrival time value; and increasing the first signal arrival time to the second signal arrival time in response to determining that the plurality of first test results includes an amount of test failures that is less than the pre-determined probability threshold. 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of sensitivity tests correspond to a hold test, and wherein the method further comprises: wherein the first signal arrival time value is shorter than the second signal arrival time value; and increasing the first signal arrival time value to the second signal arrival time value in response to determining that the plurality of first test results include an amount of test failures that is greater than the pre-determined probability threshold. 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of sensitivity tests correspond to a hold test, and wherein the method further comprises: wherein the first signal arrival time value is longer than the second signal arrival time value; and decreasing the first signal arrival time value to the second signal arrival time value in response to determining that the plurality of first test results include an amount of test failures that is less than the pre-determined probability threshold. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of sensitivity tests correspond to a pulse width test, and wherein the method further comprises: wherein the first signal arrival time value is longer than the second signal arrival time value; and decreasing the first signal arrival time value to the second signal arrival time value in response to determining that the plurality of first test results include an amount of test failures that is greater than the pre-determined probability threshold. 7. The method of claim 1 wherein plurality of sensitivity tests correspond to a pulse width test, and wherein the method further comprises: wherein the first signal arrival time value is shorter than the second signal arrival time value; and increasing the first signal arrival time value to the second signal arrival time value in response to determining that the plurality of first test results include an amount of test failures that is less than the pre-determined probability threshold. 8. The method of claim 1 wherein: the information handling system is a circuit model testing system; the plurality of sensitivity tests are simulated on a Monte Carlo simulator that generate one or more actual test failures, the one or more actual test failures included in the plurality of first test results; and the circuit model is a sequential circuit and each of the plurality of sensitivity tests has at least one unique across chip variation (ACV) parameter value. 9. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of the one or more modeling parameters are selected from the group consisting of a technology model setting parameter, a circuit model configuration parameter, a simulation stimulus parameter, and a sensitivity measurement results calculation parameter. 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising: utilizing the changed characterized sensitivity to perform a timing analysis on an integrated circuit that includes the circuit model, wherein the timing analysis produces one or more timing analysis test results.
Timing analysis or timing optimisation · CPC title
Timing analysis · CPC title
Design verification, e.g. using simulation, simulation program with integrated circuit emphasis [SPICE], direct methods or relaxation methods · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.