Inspection system
US-2024369495-A1 · Nov 7, 2024 · US
US9664628B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9664628-B2 |
| Application number | US-201113302895-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 22, 2011 |
| Priority date | Nov 23, 2010 |
| Publication date | May 30, 2017 |
| Grant date | May 30, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In order to inspect a board, a measurement area is set on a board, and reference data and measurement data of the measurement area are acquired. Then, a conversion condition is established for the measurement area, and a conversion relation is acquired according to a distortion degree between reference data and measurement data. Thereafter, validity of the conversion relation is verified by using at least one of verifying that a comparison feature object satisfies the conversion relation, verifying that a verification feature object selected from feature objects satisfies the conversion relation and verifying that a pad formed on the board satisfies the conversion relation. Then, the conversion condition is confirmed, and an inspection area for inspecting a measurement target is set according to the confirmed conversion condition. Thus, an inspection area may be correctly set so that distortion is compensated for.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. An inspection method comprising: setting, by a central processing unit, a measurement area on a board, the measurement area including a comparison feature object and a verification feature object; acquiring, by the central processing unit, reference data and measurement data of the measurement area; establishing, by the central processing unit, a conversion condition for the measurement area; acquiring, by the central processing unit, a conversion relation by comparing reference data and measurement data corresponding to the comparison feature object, wherein the conversion relation includes a distortion between the reference data and the measurement data corresponding to the comparison feature object; applying, by the central processing unit, the conversion relation with respect to reference data and measurement data corresponding to the verification feature object to obtain an error; verifying, by the central processing unit, validity of the conversion relation by determining whether the error exceeds a predetermined tolerance range; confirming, by the central processing unit, the conversion condition when the validity of the conversion relation is verified and the error does not exceed the predetermined tolerance range; and setting, by the central processing unit, an inspection area by compensating the distortion according to the confirmed conversion condition; inspecting, by the central processing unit, the board based on the inspection area to correctly judge whether the board is good or bad. 2. The inspection method of claim 1 , further comprising verifying, by a central processing unit, validity of the acquired conversion relation by using at least one of a first verification method of verifying that the verification feature object selected from feature objects except for the comparison feature object satisfies the conversion relation, and a second verification method of verifying that a pad corresponding to an inspection target formed on the board satisfies the conversion relation, and verifying validity of the conversion relation is performed in order of the first verification method and the second verification method. 3. The inspection method of claim 1 , in case that the conversion relation is not valid as a result of verification of the validity of the conversion relation, further comprising: changing the conversion condition; and repeating acquiring the conversion relation, confirming the conversion condition, and setting the inspection area. 4. The inspection method of claim 1 , wherein the conversion condition further includes at least one of a coordinate conversion model and an illumination setting of an illumination device. 5. The inspection method of claim 1 , wherein in case that the conversion relation is not valid as a result of verification of the validity of the conversion relation, further comprising repeating acquiring the conversion relation, confirming the conversion condition, and setting the inspection area, by using a conversion condition of an adjacent measurement area adjacent to the measurement area. 6. The inspection method of claim 1 , wherein the set measurement area is plural, and the conversion condition is established for each measurement area. 7. The inspection method of claim 1 , wherein the comparison feature object and the verification feature object are defined as a feature block by a block unit.
Patterns showing highly reflecting parts, e.g. metallic elements · CPC title
for PCB's · CPC title
Inspecting patterns on the surface of objects {(contactless testing of electronic circuits G01R31/308; testing currency G07D; manufacturing processes per se of semiconductor devices implementing a measuring step H10P74/20)} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.