Bidirectional counter in a flash memory
US-9870316-B2 · Jan 16, 2018 · US
US11086705B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11086705-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916357049-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 18, 2019 |
| Priority date | Mar 18, 2019 |
| Publication date | Aug 10, 2021 |
| Grant date | Aug 10, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer-implemented method, according to one embodiment, includes: performing a first read of one or more pages in a first page region of a first block. In response to determining that the highest RBER experienced during the first read is not in a first predetermined range, a first calibration procedure is performed on the one or more pages. A second read of the one or more pages is performed. In response to determining that the highest RBER experienced during the second read is not in a second predetermined range, a second calibration procedure on the one or more pages is performed, and a third read of the one or more pages is performed. In response to determining that the highest RBER experienced during the third read is not in the second predetermined range, a reliability counter which corresponds to the first page region of the first block is incremented.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: performing a first read of one or more pages in a first page region of a first block of storage space in memory; determining whether a highest raw bit error rate (RBER) experienced during the first read is in a first predetermined range; in response to determining that the highest RBER experienced during the first read is not in the first predetermined range, performing a first calibration procedure on the one or more pages in the first page region of the first block; performing a second read of the one or more pages in the first page region of the first block that were calibrated using the first calibration procedure; determining whether a highest RBER experienced during the second read is in a second predetermined range; in response to determining that the highest RBER experienced during the second read is not in the second predetermined range, performing a second calibration procedure on the one or more pages in the first page region of the first block; performing a third read of the one or more pages in the first page region of the first block that were calibrated using the second calibration procedure; determining whether a highest RBER experienced during the third read is in a third predetermined range; in response to determining that the highest RBER experienced during the third read is not in the second predetermined range, incrementing a reliability counter which corresponds to the first page region of the first block; determining whether the reliability counter which corresponds to the first page region of the first block is in a first predetermined reliability range; and in response to determining that the reliability counter which corresponds to the first page region of the first block is not in a first predetermined reliability range, marking the first page region of the first block as unreliable. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the operations are repeated in an iterative fashion for each page region in each block of storage space in the memory. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising: determining whether an amount of the first block that has been marked as unreliable is in a second predetermined reliability range; and in response to determining that the amount of the first block that has been marked as unreliable is not in the second predetermined reliability range, marking the first block as unreliable. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , comprising: converting the unreliable first block to single level cell mode. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , comprising: retiring the unreliable first block. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein performing the first calibration procedure consumes a smaller amount of time than an amount of time consumed performing the second calibration procedure. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising: performing an inspection procedure for each block of storage space in the memory in an iterative fashion, wherein the inspection procedure includes: identifying a frequency of program/erase (P/E) cycle intervals performed; determining whether the frequency of P/E cycles is in a predetermined range of P/E cycle frequencies; and in response to determining that the frequency of P/E cycles is in the predetermined range of P/E cycle frequencies, decrementing a reliability counter corresponding to each respective page region of the given block. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the memory includes three-dimensional triple-level-cell NAND Flash and/or three-dimensional quad-level-cell NAND Flash. 9. A computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith, the program instructions readable and/or executable by a processor to cause the processor to: perform, by the processor, a first read of one or more pages in a first page region of a first block of storage space in memory; determine, by the processor, whether a highest raw bit error rate (RB ER) experienced during the first read is in a first predetermined range; in response to determining that the highest RBER experienced during the first read is not in the first predetermined range, perform, by the processor, a first calibration procedure on the one or more pages in the first page region of the first block; perform, by the processor, a second read of the one or more pages in the first page region of the first block that were calibrated using the first calibration procedure; determine, by the processor, whether a highest RBER experienced during the second read is in a second predetermined range; in response to determining that the highest RBER experienced during the second read is not in the second predetermined range, perform, by the processor, a second calibration procedure on the one or more pages in the first page region of the first block; perform, by the processor, a third read of the one or more pages in the first page region of the first block that were calibrated using the second calibration procedure; determine, by the processor, whether a highest RBER experienced during the third read is in a third predetermined range; in response to determining that the highest RBER experienced during the third read is not in the third predetermined range, increment, by the processor, a reliability counter which corresponds to the first page region of the first block; determine, by the processor, whether the reliability counter which corresponds to the first page region of the first block is in a first predetermined reliability range; and in response to determining that the reliability counter which corresponds to the first page region of the first block is not in a first predetermined reliability range, mark, by the processor, the first page region of the first block as unreliable. 10. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein the operations are repeated in an iterative fashion for each page region in each block of storage space in the memory. 11. The computer program product of claim 9 , the program instructions readable and/or executable by the processor to cause the processor to: determine, by the processor, whether an amount of the first block that has been marked as unreliable is in a second predetermined reliability range; and in response to determining that the amount of the first block that has been marked as unreliable is not in the second predetermined reliability range, mark, by the processor, the first block as unreliable. 12. The computer program product of claim 11 , the program instructions readable and/or executable by the processor to cause the processor to: convert, by the processor, the unreliable first block to single level cell mode. 13. The computer program product of claim 11 , the program instructions readable and/or executable by the processor to cause the processor to: retire, by the processor, the unreliable first block. 14. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein performing the first calibration procedure consumes a smaller amount of time than an amount of time consumed performing the second calibration procedure. 15. The computer program product of claim 9 , the program instructions readable and/or executable by the processor to cause the processor to: perform, by the processor, an inspection procedure for each block of storage space in the memory in an iterative fashion, wherein the inspection procedure includes: identifying a frequency of program/erase (P/E) cycle intervals performed; deter
for self repair · CPC title
Internal storage of test result, quality data, chip identification, repair information · CPC title
by exceeding a count or rate limit, e.g. word- or bit count limit · CPC title
Management of blocks · CPC title
Sensing or reading circuits; Data output circuits · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.