Dynamic object relevance determination
US-12128887-B1 · Oct 29, 2024 · US
US12461532B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12461532-B2 |
| Application number | US-202318118696-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 7, 2023 |
| Priority date | Mar 7, 2022 |
| Publication date | Nov 4, 2025 |
| Grant date | Nov 4, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods, systems, and apparatus for predicting future trajectories of agents in an environment. In one aspect, a system comprises one or more computers configured to receive a data set comprising multiple training examples. The training examples include scene data comprising respective agent data for multiple agents and a ground truth trajectory for a target agent that represents ground truth motion of the target agent after a corresponding time point. The one or more computers obtain data identifying one or more of the multiple agents as non-causal agents for each training example. A non-causal agent is an agent whose states do not cause the ground truth trajectory for the target agent to change. The one or more computers generate a respective modified training example from each of the multiple training examples.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1 . A method performed by one or more computers, the method comprising: receiving a training example identifying (i) respective agent data for each of a plurality of agents in a scene of an environment at a corresponding time point, the plurality of agents comprising a target agent and a set of other agents, and (ii) a ground truth trajectory for the target agent that represents ground truth motion of the target agent after the corresponding time point; obtaining data identifying, as non-causal agents, one or more of the set of other agents identified in the training example; and generating a modified training example by modifying the respective agent data for one or more of the other agents that were identified as non-causal agents, the generating comprising: removing the respective agent data for a set of non-causal agents, wherein a number of non-causal agents in the set is based on a number of causal agents in the scene. 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: training a behavior prediction neural network on training data that includes the modified training example. 3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: processing modified scene data comprising the modified agent data in the modified training example using a trained behavior prediction neural network to generate a behavior prediction output for the target agent in the modified training example; determining one or more robustness measures for the trained behavior prediction neural network based on (i) the behavior prediction output for the target agent in the modified training example and (ii) the ground truth trajectory for the target agent in the training example. 4 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising: processing scene data in the corresponding training example using the trained behavior prediction neural network to generate a behavior prediction output for the target agent in the training example; and determining one or more sensitivity measures for the trained behavior prediction neural network based on (i) the behavior prediction output for the target agent in the modified training example generated by processing the modified training example and (ii) the behavior prediction output for the target agent in the modified training example generated by processing the training example. 5 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising: determining whether to deploy the trained behavior prediction neural network on-board an autonomous vehicle based at least on the one or more sensitivity measures for the trained behavior prediction neural network. 6 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising: determining whether to deploy the trained behavior prediction neural network on-board an autonomous vehicle based at least on the one or more robustness measures for the trained behavior prediction neural network. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining data identifying, as non-causal agents, one or more of the set of other agents in the scene for the training example comprises: obtaining inputs from one or more users labeling agents in the scene as causal or non-causal agents. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining data identifying, as non-causal agents, one or more of the set of other agents in the scene for the training example comprises: determining that one or more stationary agents in the scene are non-causal agents. 9 . A method performed by one or more computers, the method comprising: receiving a training example identifying (i) respective agent data for each of a plurality of agents in a scene of an environment at a corresponding time point, the plurality of agents comprising a target agent and a set of other agents, and (ii) a ground truth trajectory for the target agent that represents ground truth motion of the target agent after the corresponding time point; obtaining data identifying, as non-causal agents, one or more of the set of other agents identified in the training example; and generating a modified training example by modifying the respective agent data for one or more of the other agents that were identified as non-causal agents, the generating comprising: applying perturbations to the respective agent data of one or more of the identified non-causal agents by sampling from a particular distribution for the identified non-causal agent. 10 . The method of claim 9 , further comprising: training a behavior prediction neural network on training data that includes the modified training example. 11 . The method of claim 9 , further comprising: processing modified scene data comprising the respective modified agent data in the modified training example using a trained behavior prediction neural network to generate a behavior prediction output for the target agent in the modified training example; and determining one or more robustness measures for the trained behavior prediction neural network based on (i) the behavior prediction output for the target agent in the modified training example and (ii) the ground truth trajectory for the target agent in the training example. 12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising: processing scene data in the corresponding training example using the trained behavior prediction neural network to generate a behavior prediction output for the target agent in the training example; and determining one or more sensitivity measures for the trained behavior prediction neural network based on, for each modified training example, (i) the behavior prediction output for the target agent in the modified training example generated by processing the modified training example and (ii) the behavior prediction output for the target agent in the modified training example generated by processing the training example. 13 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising: determining whether to deploy the trained behavior prediction neural network on-board an autonomous vehicle based at least on the one or more sensitivity measures for the trained behavior prediction neural network. 14 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising: determining whether to deploy the trained behavior prediction neural network on-board an autonomous vehicle based at least on the one or more robustness measures for the trained behavior prediction neural network. 15 . The method of claim 9 , wherein obtaining data identifying, as non-causal agents, one or more of the set of other agents in the scene for the training example comprises: obtaining inputs from one or more users labeling agents in the scene as causal or non-causal agents. 16 . The method of claim 9 , wherein obtaining data identifying, as non-causal agents, one or more of the set of other agents in the scene for the training example comprises: determining that one or more stationary agents in the scene are non-causal agents. 17 . A system comprising: one or more computers; and one or more storage devices storing instructions that when executed by one or more computers cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising: receiving a training example identifying (i) respective agent data for each of a plurality of agents in a scene of an environment at a corresponding time point, the plurality of agents comprising a target agent and a set of other agents, and (ii) a ground truth trajectory for the target agent that represents ground truth motion of the target agent after the corresponding time point; obtaining data identifying, as non-causal agents, one or more of the set of other agents identified in the training
using trajectory prediction for other traffic participants · CPC title
of traffic, e.g. cars on the road, trains or boats · CPC title
using neural networks · CPC title
Generating sets of training patterns; Bootstrap methods, e.g. bagging or boosting · CPC title
Recognition of moving objects or obstacles, e.g. vehicles or pedestrians; Recognition of traffic objects, e.g. traffic signs, traffic lights or roads · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.