Fast freeform source and mask co-optimization method

US11042687B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-11042687-B2
Application numberUS-202016821048-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateMar 17, 2020
Priority dateNov 21, 2008
Publication dateJun 22, 2021
Grant dateJun 22, 2021

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

The present disclosure relates to lithographic apparatuses and processes, and more particularly to tools for optimizing illumination sources and masks for use in lithographic apparatuses and processes. According to certain aspects, the present disclosure significantly speeds up the convergence of the optimization by allowing direct computation of gradient of the cost function. According to other aspects, the present disclosure allows for simultaneous optimization of both source and mask, thereby significantly speeding the overall convergence. According to still further aspects, the present disclosure allows for free-form optimization, without the constraints required by conventional optimization techniques.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method, the method comprising: obtaining respective initial descriptions of an illumination and a patterning device pattern for a lithographic process, wherein the patterning device pattern is to be imaged onto a substrate by the lithographic process using the illumination and wherein the initial description of the illumination is represented as a plurality of radiation intensity pixels and the initial description of the patterning device pattern is represented as a plurality of pattern pixels; and iteratively adjusting, by a hardware computer system, gray scale values of the plurality of radiation intensity pixels and values of the plurality of pattern pixels, until a performance metric of the lithographic process is suitably configured with respect to both the illumination and the patterning device pattern. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjusting allows a fully flexible set of illumination points so that the illumination can have a free form. 3. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions therein, the instructions, upon execution by a computer system, configured to cause the computer system to at least: obtain respective initial descriptions of an illumination and a patterning device pattern for a lithographic process, wherein the patterning device pattern is to be imaged onto a substrate by the lithographic process using the illumination and wherein the illumination is represented as a plurality of radiation intensity pixels and the patterning device pattern is represented as a plurality of pattern pixels; and iteratively adjust gray scale values of the plurality of radiation intensity pixels and values of the plurality of pattern pixels, until a performance metric of the lithographic process is suitably configured with respect to both the illumination and the patterning device pattern. 4. The computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the computer system to adjust gray scale values allow a fully flexible set of illumination points so that the illumination can have a free form. 5. The computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to modify the description of the illumination from a grayscale illumination to a modified illumination constrained by a manufacturability factor. 6. The computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to modify the description of the patterning device pattern from a grayscale pattern to a modified pattern constrained by a manufacturability factor. 7. The computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the computer system to adjust gray scale values are further configured to cause the computer system to evaluate a cost function, wherein the cost function comprises a function of both the illumination and the patterning device pattern. 8. The computer-readable medium of claim 7 , wherein the cost function is formulated in terms of one of the following: worst case edge placement error (EPE) over a given process window, EPE least square function, EPE least p-norm function, inverse normalized image log slope (NILS) p-norm function, contour integral image slope, edge image value least square, edge image p-norm, or image log slope (ILS) p-norm. 9. The computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the computer system to adjust gray scale values are further configured to cause the computer system to iteratively adjust gray scale values of the plurality of pattern pixels. 10. The computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the computer system to adjust gray scale values are further configured to cause the computer system to use a gradient of the performance metric of the lithographic process with respect to the illumination and the patterning device pattern. 11. The computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the performance metric of the lithographic process is suitably configured when the gradient of the performance metric of the lithographic process with respect to both the illumination and the patterning device pattern is essentially zero. 12. The computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the performance metric of the lithographic process comprises one or more selected from: an edge placement error (EPE), an image log slope, an inverse image log slope, and/or a contour integral of an image log slope. 13. The computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to accelerate the iterative adjusting by performing a first co-optimization without constraints followed by performing a second co-optimization with constraints. 14. A non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions therein, the instructions, upon execution by a computer system, configured to cause the computer system to receive descriptions of an illumination and a patterning device pattern, the patterning device pattern to be imaged by a lithographic process using the illumination; until the illumination and patterning device pattern are suitably configured for a performance metric of the lithographic process, selectively repeat: evaluation of a cost function that is a function of both the illumination and the patterning device pattern the cost function, calculate a derivative of the cost function with respect to the illumination and a derivative of the cost function with respect to the patterning device pattern, and reconfigure the illumination and patterning device pattern descriptions based on both the calculated derivatives. 15. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the illumination and patterning device pattern are suitably configured when a gradient based on the calculated derivatives has a value of essentially zero. 16. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to characterize the illumination as independent free form illumination points. 17. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the illumination is represented as a plurality of radiation intensity pixels having gray scale values. 18. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the patterning device pattern is represented as a plurality of pattern pixels having gray scale value. 19. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the computer system to reconfigure the patterning device pattern description are further configured to cause the computer system to: use optical proximity correction; place sub-resolution assist features; and re-characterize the reconfigured patterning device pattern description. 20. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the cost function is formulated in terms of worst case edge placement error over a given process window.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Modelling or simulating from physical phenomena up to complete wafer processes or whole workflow in wafer productions · CPC title

  • Projection system adjustments, e.g. adjustments during exposure or alignment during assembly of projection system · CPC title

  • Illumination system adjustment, e.g. adjustments during exposure or alignment during assembly of illumination system · CPC title

  • G03F1/36Primary

    Masks having proximity correction features; Preparation thereof, e.g. optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes · CPC title

  • Use of illumination settings tailored to particular mask patterns (details of setting means G03F7/70091) · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US11042687B2 cover?
The present disclosure relates to lithographic apparatuses and processes, and more particularly to tools for optimizing illumination sources and masks for use in lithographic apparatuses and processes. According to certain aspects, the present disclosure significantly speeds up the convergence of the optimization by allowing direct computation of gradient of the cost function. According to othe…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Asml Netherlands Bv
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G03F1/36. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jun 22 2021 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 3 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).