Assessing accuracy of a machine learning model
US-2019311287-A1 · Oct 10, 2019 · US
US10949252B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10949252-B1 |
| Application number | US-201815895747-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Feb 13, 2018 |
| Priority date | Feb 13, 2018 |
| Publication date | Mar 16, 2021 |
| Grant date | Mar 16, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Techniques for benchmarking a machine learning model/algorithm are described. For example, in some instances a method includes generating an execution plan for benchmarking of at least one task corresponding to a machine learning model based on an identified machine learning model, identified training data, and at least one objective for the benchmarking job; receiving execution statistics about the execution of the task as a part of the benchmarking job according to the execution plan; and updating the execution plan based at least in part on the received execution statistics of the task.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving a request to generate an execution plan for a benchmarking job of at least one training or inference task for an identified machine learning model, the request including at least one objective for the benchmarking job; generating the execution plan for benchmarking job the at least one training or inference task, the execution plan corresponding to a machine learning model based on the identified machine learning model, identified training data, and the at least one objective for the benchmarking job; providing the generated execution plan to a monitor service that is to receive statistics about an execution of the execution plan; receiving execution statistics about the execution of the at least one training or inference task performed by the machine learning model as a part of the benchmarking job according to the execution plan from the monitor service; and updating the execution plan based at least in part on the received execution statistics about the execution of the at least one training or inference task. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: triggering execution of the execution plan by the monitor service. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the generating of the execution plan is further based on at least one of hardware available to a user requesting the benchmarking job, available jobs to batch with the task, previous execution of the task to be run as a job, and previous execution of similar jobs. 4. A computer-implemented method comprising: generating an execution plan for a benchmarking job of at least one training or inference task corresponding to a machine learning model based on an identified machine learning model, identified training data, and at least one objective for the benchmarking job; receiving execution statistics about the execution of the at least one training or inference task performed by the machine learning model as a part of the benchmarking job according to the execution plan; and updating the execution plan based at least in part on the received execution statistics of the at least one training or inference task. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising: triggering execution of the execution plan by a monitor service. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the generating of the execution plan is further based on at least one of hardware available to a user requesting the benchmarking job, available jobs to batch with the task, previous execution of the task to be run as a job, and previous execution of similar jobs. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the generating of the execution plan includes simulating the training of a model of the task to determine what hardware is capable of executing the task and meet the objective. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the generating of the execution plan includes executing the training of a model of the task to determine what hardware is capable of executing the task and meet the objective. 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the execution of the task as a part of the benchmarking job according to the execution plan occurs in a virtual machine. 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the execution of the task as a part of the benchmarking job according to the execution plan occurs in a container. 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the objective is at least one of: a shortest possible time to complete the task, a minimum hardware usage possible to complete the task, and accuracy of the machine learning model. 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the generated execution plan is a batch that includes other jobs to be executed on the same hardware. 13. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising: generating metrics about the execution of the task based on the received execution statistics. 14. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising: generating an alarm when the execution of the task exceeds a threshold metric. 15. A system comprising: execution resources to implement a benchmarking job according to an execution plan; and a benchmarking service implemented by a second one or more electronic devices, the benchmarking service including instructions that upon execution cause the benchmarking service to: generate an execution plan for a benchmarking job of at least one training or inference task corresponding to a machine learning model based on an identified machine learning model, identified training data, and at least one objective for the benchmarking job; receive execution statistics about the execution of the at least one training or inference task performed by the machine learning model as a part of the benchmarking job according to the execution plan; and update the execution plan based at least in part on the received execution statistics of the at least one training or inference task. 16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions upon execution further cause the benchmarking service to: trigger execution of the execution plan on the execution resources. 17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the generation of the execution plan is further based on at least one of hardware available to a user requesting the benchmarking job, available jobs to batch with the task, previous execution of the task to be run as a job, and previous execution of similar jobs. 18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the generation of the execution plan includes executing the training of a model of the task to determine what hardware is capable of executing the task and meet the objective. 19. The system of claim 15 , wherein the execution of the task as a part of the benchmarking job according to the execution plan occurs in a virtual machine. 20. The system of claim 15 , wherein the execution of the task as a part of the benchmarking job according to the execution plan occurs in a container.
Machine learning · CPC title
Performance evaluation by modeling · CPC title
Performance evaluation by statistical analysis · CPC title
Benchmarking · CPC title
Scheduling strategies for dispatcher, e.g. round robin, multi-level priority queues · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.