Criticality analysis augmented process window qualification sampling

US10503078B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10503078-B2
Application numberUS-201815903841-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateFeb 23, 2018
Priority dateSep 1, 2017
Publication dateDec 10, 2019
Grant dateDec 10, 2019

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Techniques are provided that can select defects based on criticality of design pattern as well as defect attributes for process window qualification (PWQ). Defects are sorted into categories based on process conditions and similarity of design. Shape based grouping can be performed on the random defects. Highest design based grouping scores can be assigned to the bins, which are then sorted. Particular defects can be selected from the bins. These defects may be reviewed.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: sorting, using a processor, defects from a plurality of design based grouping bins into a plurality of categories based on a plurality of process conditions; sorting, using the processor, the defects based on similarity of design into a plurality of bins, wherein each of the bins includes at least one of the design based grouping bins; selecting, using the processor, a random defect from the defects in each of the design based grouping bins; performing, using the processor, shape based grouping on each of the random defects; for each of the bins, selecting, using the processor, one of the design based grouping bins with a score on an end of a range of scores after the shape based grouping, wherein the score is a highest score or a lowest score; assigning, using the processor, the respective score that was selected to each of the bins; sorting, using the processor, the bins in order by the respective scores; and selecting, using the processor, one of the defects with a highest defect attribute value from each of the bins for each of the plurality of process conditions. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising performing a review of a wafer using a scanning electron microscope after selecting the defects with the highest defect attribute value. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: re-ordering, using the processor, the defects, the bins, and the design based grouping bins; and repeating assigning the respective score, sorting of the bins in order starting with the score, and selecting one of the defects with the highest defect attribute value. 4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising performing a review of a wafer using a scanning electron microscope after selecting the defects with the highest defect attribute value. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of categories includes four of the categories. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of process conditions include focus and exposure. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein sorting the defects based on similarity of the design uses a bin merge algorithm. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein prior to sorting the defects from the plurality of design based grouping bins the method further comprises: grouping, using the processor, the defects into the design based grouping bins; consolidating, using the processor, the design based grouping bins into the bins; grouping, using the processor, the bins based on the plurality of process conditions; and determining, using the processor, dies that indicate an inflection in defect count. 9. A system comprising: a processor in electronic communication with an electronic data storage unit and a wafer inspection tool, wherein the processor is configured to: sort defects from a plurality of design based grouping bins into a plurality of categories based on a plurality of process conditions; sort the defects based on similarity of design into a plurality of bins, wherein each of the bins includes at least one of the design based grouping bins; select a random defect from the defects in each of the design based grouping bins; perform shape based grouping on each of the random defects; for each of the bins, select one of the design based grouping bins with a score on an end of a range of scores after the shape based grouping, wherein the score is a highest score or a lowest score; assign the respective score that was selected to each of the bins; sort the bins in order by the respective scores; and select one of the defects with a highest defect attribute value from each of the bins for each of the plurality of process conditions. 10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the wafer inspection tool is a scanning electron microscope. 11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the processor is further configured to: re-order the defects, the bins, and the design based grouping bins; and repeat assigning the respective score, sorting of the bins in order starting with the score, and selecting one of the defects with the highest defect attribute value. 12. The system of claim 9 , wherein prior to sorting the defects from the plurality of design based grouping bins the processor is further configured to: group the defects into the design based grouping bins; consolidate the design based grouping bins into the bins; group the bins based on the plurality of process conditions; and determine dies that indicate an inflection in defect count. 13. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, comprising one or more programs for executing the following steps on one or more computing devices: sorting defects from a plurality of design based grouping bins into a plurality of categories based on a plurality of process conditions; sorting the defects based on similarity of design into a plurality of bins using a bin merge algorithm, wherein each of the bins includes at least one of the design based grouping bins; selecting a random defect from the defects in each of the design based grouping bins; performing shape based grouping on each of the random defects; for each of the bins, selecting one of the design based grouping bins with a score on an end of a range of scores after the shape based grouping, wherein the score is a highest score or a lowest score; assigning the respective score that was selected to each of the bins; sorting the bins in order by the respective scores; and selecting one of the defects with a highest defect attribute value from each of the bins for each of the plurality of process conditions. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the steps further include: re-ordering the defects, the bins, and the design based grouping bins; and repeating assigning the respective score, sorting of the bins in order starting with the score, and selecting one of the defects with the highest defect attribute value. 15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the plurality of categories includes four of the categories. 16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the plurality of process conditions include focus and exposure. 17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein sorting the defects based on similarity of the design uses a bin merge algorithm. 18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein prior to sorting the defects from the plurality of design based grouping bins the steps further include: grouping the defects into the design based grouping bins; consolidating the design based grouping bins into the bins; grouping the bins based on the plurality of process conditions; and determining dies that indicate an inflection in defect count.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Structural properties, e.g. testing or measuring thicknesses, line widths, warpage, bond strengths or physical defects · CPC title

  • using a comparative method · CPC title

  • Inspecting · CPC title

  • G03F7/7065Primary

    Defects, e.g. optical inspection of patterned layer for defects · CPC title

  • Aerial image, i.e. measuring the image of the patterned exposure light at the image plane of the projection system · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10503078B2 cover?
Techniques are provided that can select defects based on criticality of design pattern as well as defect attributes for process window qualification (PWQ). Defects are sorted into categories based on process conditions and similarity of design. Shape based grouping can be performed on the random defects. Highest design based grouping scores can be assigned to the bins, which are then sorted. Pa…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Kla Tencor Corp
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G03F7/7065. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Dec 10 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 3 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).