Microfluidic Device For Real-Time Clinical Monitoring And Quantitative Assessment Of Whole Blood Coagulation
US-2017100714-A1 · Apr 13, 2017 · US
US9892225B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9892225-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615088581-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 1, 2016 |
| Priority date | Apr 1, 2016 |
| Publication date | Feb 13, 2018 |
| Grant date | Feb 13, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Described herein is a method of designing micro-fluidic devices. A target cost function based on device design parameters is chosen. The performance of one or more design candidates is run in a simulation model. A design candidate with a cost function closest to the target cost function is chosen and modified in an optimization routine to provide a modified design candidate having modified device design parameters. The cost function for the modified initial design candidate is computed, and when the modified design candidate has a computed cost function that meets the target cost function, optimized device design parameters of an optimized device design are obtained. Additional optimization iterations may be performed as needed to arrive at an optimized device design. A micro-fluidic device based on the optimized device design is manufactured.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method of fabricating micro-fluidic devices, comprising: determining a target cost function based on one or more of task, particles, system features, and design type as device design parameters; simulating the performance of one or more chosen design candidates in a selected simulation model and identifying a design candidate with a cost function closest to the target cost function as a best initial design candidate; on the best initial design candidate, running an optimization routine to modify design parameters of the best initial design candidate to provide a modified design candidate having design parameters differing from the design parameters of the best initial design candidate, and computing a cost function for the modified initial design candidate; in a hardware processor, returning optimized device design parameters of an optimized device design derived from a modified design candidate having a computed cost function that meets the target cost function; repeating, if necessary, the optimization routine on the modified design candidate until the computed cost function for the modified design candidate meets the determined target cost function; and fabricating an optimized micro-fluidic device using the modified design candidate and the optimized device design parameters. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the target cost function is further defined in relation to one or more variables that include computed particle positions at selected device locations and maximum lateral particle displacement at selected device locations. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising choosing first design candidates from one or more preexisting design candidates representing previously manufactured micro-fluidic devices that have design parameters similar to the parameters on which the target cost function is based. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the running of an optimization routine comprises selecting a preexisting optimization algorithm, fragmenting the parameters of the best initial design candidate into variables to be adjusted for optimization, determining the cost function for the modified design candidate and checking an intermediate solution that is obtained against design constraints, determining if the computed cost function for the modified design candidate meets the determined target cost function; and, when repeating the optimization routine on the modified design candidate, further modifying the variables for optimization until the computed cost function for the modified design candidate meets the determined target cost function. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the constraints are one or more of particle trajectory, geometric limitations of the device, geometric limitations of an electrode, limitations imposed by device materials, and robustness of a design specification. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the running of an optimization routine comprises modifying a best initial design candidate that represents the design of a previously fabricated micro-fluidic device by modifying design parameters of the previously fabricated micro-fluidic device to provide a modified design candidate having an electrode configuration that differs from the electrode configuration of the previously fabricated micro-fluidic device. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising entering the optimized device design parameters of an optimized device design into a database of design candidates to be used as a chosen design candidate in a subsequent designing of a micro-fluidic device. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the parameters relating to particles are one or more of particle size, particle mass, particle material, and particle morphology; the parameters relating to task are one or more of sorting particles, separating particles, trapping particles, and concentrating particles; the parameters relating to system are one or more of channel material, channel geometry, channel dimensions, device geometry, properties of fluid transported in the device, electrode voltages, electrode geometry, electrode dimensions, frequency of electrical signals, and device operating temperature; the parameters relating to design type are one or more of polygonal design layout type and pixel design layout type. 9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying one or more of the chosen design candidates, the best initial design candidate, the modified design candidate and the optimized device design on an image display device of an interactive workstation in which a user may input information pertaining to the method. 10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying one or more of the first design candidates, the best initial design candidate, the modified design candidate and the optimized device design as images comprised of pixels on a display device, and wherein device design changes are imaged on the display device through pixel manipulation. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the optimized device design parameters of an optimized device design include an optimized configuration of electrode voltage and operating conditions that are incorporated in the micro-fluidic device of the optimized device design. 12. A system for fabricating micro-fluidic devices, comprising: one or more processors including memory; a cost function calculator for determining a target cost function value based on selected input information relating to device design parameters including one or more of task, particles, system and design layout and for determining cost function values for design candidates; a design candidate selector that, based upon the defined system parameters, selects one or more micro-fluidic device designs as design candidates based on a comparison between the design parameters of the one or more micro-fluidic device designs and present device design parameters, or which accepts a user-input design candidate; a simulation model operator that runs simulation models on one or more design candidates and identifies a best initial design candidate based on computed cost function; an optimization routine operator that modifies the best initial design candidate and optimizes said best initial design candidate by performing an optimization routine including: modifying design parameters of the best initial design candidate to provide a modified design candidate having parameters that differ from the parameters of the best initial design candidate, running a simulation model on the modified design candidate, checking a cost function of the modified design candidate against the target cost function, forwarding optimized design parameters of an optimized device design as system output when the computed cost function of the modified design candidate meets the target cost function value; and performing further optimization routines when the cost function of the modified design candidate does not meet the target cost function value; and a fabricator configured to fabricate an optimized micro-fluidic device using the modified design candidate and the optimized device design parameters. 13. The system of claim 12 , further comprising an interactive user interface for displaying device design progress of one or more of the design candidates, the best initial design candidate, the modified design candidate and the optimized device design and for receiving user input of design-related commands during device design. 14. The system of claim 12 , further comprising a micro-fluidic device fabricator and a controller that receives the system output of an optimized device design and controls the fabrication of optimized mic
Constraint-based CAD · CPC title
using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM] · CPC title
Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability · CPC title
Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title
Circuit design at the physical level (physical level design for reconfigurable circuits G06F30/347) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.