Integrated camera mounting and image window cleaning device
US-2015353057-A1 · Dec 10, 2015 · US
US9874512B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9874512-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414466516-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 22, 2014 |
| Priority date | Feb 25, 2013 |
| Publication date | Jan 23, 2018 |
| Grant date | Jan 23, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer-implemented method for determining an optimized purge gas flow in a semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus, comprising receiving a permissible contaminant mole fraction, a contaminant outgassing flow rate associated with a contaminant, a contaminant mass diffusivity, an outgassing surface length, a pressure, a temperature, a channel height, and a molecular weight of a purge gas, calculating a flow factor based on the permissible contaminant mole fraction, the contaminant outgassing flow rate, the channel height, and the outgassing surface length, comparing the flow factor to a predefined maximum flow factor value, calculating a minimum purge gas velocity and a purge gas mass flow rate from the flow factor, the contaminant mass diffusivity, the pressure, the temperature, and the molecular weight of the purge gas, and introducing the purge gas into the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus with the minimum purge gas velocity and the purge gas flow rate.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for determining an optimized purge gas flow in a semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus, comprising: accepting, using a processor, a first input identifying a position of at least one input port for a semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus; or identifying, using a processor, a position of at least one input port for a semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus; accepting, using the processor, a second input identifying a position of at least one output port for the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus; or identifying, using the processor, a position of at least one output port for a semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus; identifying, using the processor: at least one desorption surface in the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus; a desorption rate associated with the at least one desorption surface; and, a contaminant released from the at least one desorption surface; identifying, using the processor, at least one purge gas flow path, through the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus for a purge gas; calculating, using the processor and the respective identifications of the at least one desorption surface, the desorption rate, and the released contaminant, at least one minimum velocity and flow rate for a flow of purge gas, from the position of the at least one input port across the at least one desorption surface to the position of the at least one output port, sufficient to transport the released contaminant from a vicinity of the at least one desorption surface to the at least one output port; introducing the purge gas into the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus through the at least one input port with the at least one minimum velocity and gas flow rate; and, transporting the released contaminant from the vicinity of the at least one desorption surface to the at least one output port. 2. The method recited in claim 1 , further comprising: identifying, using the processor, a set of channel dimensions within the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus. 3. The method recited in claim 2 , further comprising: calculating, using the processor and the set of channel dimensions, the at least one minimum velocity and flow rate. 4. The method recited in claim 1 , further comprising: determining, using the processor and the respective identifications of the at least one desorption surface, the desorption rate, and the released contaminant, at least one optimal input port position; and, introducing the purge gas at the at least one optimal input port. 5. The method recited in claim 1 , further comprising: determining, using the processor and the respective identifications of the at least one desorption surface, the desorption rate, and the released contaminant, at least one optimal output port position; and, transporting the released contaminant from the vicinity of the at least one desorption surface to the at least one optimal output port. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the purge gas is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and helium. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the contaminant is selected from the group consisting of water and hydrocarbon gasses. 8. A system for determining an optimized purge gas flow in a semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus, comprising: a processor arranged to: accept a first input identifying a position of at least one input port for a semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus; or identifying, using a processor, a position of at least one input port for a semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus; accept a second input identifying a position of at least one output port for the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus; or identifying, using the processor, a position of at least one output port for a semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus; identify: at least one desorption surface in the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus; a desorption rate associated with the at least one desorption surface; and, a contaminant released from the at least one desorption surface; identify at least one purge gas flow path, through the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus for a purge gas; calculate using, the respective identifications of the at least one desorption surface, the desorption rate and the released contaminant, at least one minimum velocity and flow rate for a flow of purge gas, from the position of the at least one input port across the at least one desorption surface to the position of the at least one output port, sufficient to transport the released contaminant from a vicinity of the at least one desorption surface to the at least one output port; actuate the at least one input port to introduce the purge gas into the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus with the at least one minimum velocity and gas flow rate; and, actuate the at least one output port to receive the purge gas flow and the released contaminant from the vicinity of the at least one desorption surface. 9. The system recited in claim 8 , wherein the processor is arranged to identify a set of channel dimensions within the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus. 10. The system recited in claim 9 , wherein the processor is arranged to calculate the at least one minimum velocity and flow rate using the set of channel dimension. 11. The system recited in claim 8 , wherein the processor is arrange to: determine at least one optimal input port position using the respective identifications of the at least one desorption surface, the desorption rate, and the released contaminant; and, actuate the at least one input port to introduce the purge gas. 12. The system recited in claim 8 , wherein the processor is arrange to: determine, using the respective identifications of the at least one desorption surface, the desorption rate, and the released contaminant, at least one optimal output port position; and, actuate the at least one optimal output port to remove the purge gas and the released contaminant from the semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus. 13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the purge gas is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, helium, and mixed gas containing hydrogen and helium. 14. The system of claim 8 , wherein the contaminant is selected from the group consisting of water, hydrocarbon gasses, acids, bases, inorganics, metal ions, metal hydrides, and silicon containing compounds including siloxanes. 15. A method for determining an optimized purge gas flow in a semi-conductor inspection metrology or lithography apparatus, comprising: receiving, using a processor, respective inputs in the nature of a permissible contaminant mole fraction, an expected contaminant outgassing flow rate associated with a contaminant, a mass diffusivity of the contaminant, an outgassing surface length, a permissible pressure, a permissible temperature, a channel height, and a molecular weight of a purge gas; calculating, using the processor, a flow factor based on the permissible contaminant mole fraction, the expected contaminant outgassing flow rate, the channel height, and the outgassing surface length; comparing, using the processor, the flow factor to a predefined maximum flow factor value; calculating, using the processor, a minimum
Preventing contamination of the components of the optical system or obstruction of the light path · CPC title
Gas blown · CPC title
Purge, e.g. exchanging fluid or gas to remove pollutants · CPC title
Semiconductor wafers (manufacturing processes per se of semiconductor devices implementing a measuring step H10P74/20) · CPC title
Modelling or simulating from physical phenomena up to complete wafer processes or whole workflow in wafer productions · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.