Automated alert management
US-9219639-B2 · Dec 22, 2015 · US
US9836377B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9836377-B1 |
| Application number | US-201314030473-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Sep 18, 2013 |
| Priority date | Sep 18, 2013 |
| Publication date | Dec 5, 2017 |
| Grant date | Dec 5, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method includes receiving respective statistics for a plurality of infrastructure implementations. Each infrastructure implementation includes a respective organization and a respective deployment architecture. The method also includes determining a selected infrastructure implementation of the plurality of infrastructure implementations. The method further includes determining, using a processor, first particular implementations comparable to the selected infrastructure implementations from the plurality of infrastructure implementations, based on characteristics of the respective organization of the selected infrastructure implementation. The method additionally includes determining comparison metrics. The determining comparison metrics includes anonymizing the respective organization of each of the first particular implementations, and aggregating the respective statistics of each of the anonymized first particular implementations into comparison statistics. The comparison metrics include the comparison statistics, each respective deployment architecture of each of the first particular implementations, and the selected infrastructure implementation.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method, comprising: determining, by an infrastructure management process, a configuration of hosted applications in a deployment architecture for a selected infrastructure implementation that is provided for a particular organization associated with a particular industry; determining, by the infrastructure management process, first particular implementations comparable to the selected infrastructure implementation based on whether each implementation hosts the same applications as the configuration of hosted applications for the selected infrastructure implementation; determining, by the infrastructure management process, second particular implementations provided for organizations that are associated with the particular industry, wherein the first and second particular implementations are selected from a plurality of infrastructure implementations deployed for respective organizations in a cloud environment; anonymizing, by the infrastructure management process, the respective organization for each of the first and second particular implementations; aggregating, by the infrastructure management process, performance statistics for each of the anonymized first and second particular implementations for comparison with the selected infrastructure implementation, wherein the performance statistics describe resource utilization of each first and second particular implementation while deployed; determining, by the infrastructure management process, a performance deficiency for the selected infrastructure implementation by comparing (1) performance statistics for the selected infrastructure implementation, (2) the aggregated performance statistics for the first particular implementations, and (3) the aggregated performance statistics for the second particular implementations, and performing, by the infrastructure management process, at least one resource management action to address the performance deficiency based on the performance deficiency. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the respective organizations of the first particular implementations is associated with one of a plurality of industries; and wherein the characteristics of the respective organization of the selected infrastructure implementation comprise the respective associated industry. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective statistics for the plurality of infrastructure implementations comprise: performance statistics; and reliability statistics. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining a ranking of the selected infrastructure implementation based on a comparison of the respective statistics of each of the first particular implementations and the selected infrastructure implementation statistics. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective statistics for the plurality of infrastructure implementations comprise energy consumption statistics. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining first particular implementations comparable to the selected infrastructure implementation further comprises: determining a market segment associated with the respective organization for the selected infrastructure implementation; and determining comparable infrastructure implementations based on the market segment, wherein the first particular implementations include the comparable infrastructure implementations. 7. A computer configured to access a storage device, the computer comprising: a processor; and a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium storing computer-readable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the computer to perform: determining, by an infrastructure management process, a configuration of hosted applications in a deployment architecture for a selected infrastructure implementation that is provided for a particular organization associated with a particular industry; determining, by the infrastructure management process, first particular implementations comparable to the selected infrastructure implementation based on whether each implementation hosts the same applications as the configuration of hosted applications for the selected infrastructure implementation; determining, by the infrastructure management process, second particular implementations provided for organizations that are associated with the particular industry, wherein the first and second particular implementations are selected from a plurality of infrastructure implementations deployed for respective organizations in a cloud environment; anonymizing, by the infrastructure management process, the respective organization for each of the first and second particular implementations; aggregating, by the infrastructure management process, performance statistics for each of the anonymized first and second particular implementations for comparison with the selected infrastructure implementation, wherein the performance statistics describe resource utilization of each first and second particular implementation while deployed; determining, by the infrastructure management process, a performance deficiency for the selected infrastructure implementation by comparing (1) performance statistics for the selected infrastructure implementation, (2) the aggregated performance statistics for the first particular implementations, and (3) the aggregated performance statistics for the second particular implementations, and performing, by the infrastructure management process, at least one resource management action to address the performance deficiency based on the performance deficiency. 8. The computer of claim 7 , wherein each of the respective organizations of the first particular implementations is associated with one of a plurality of industries; and wherein the characteristics of the respective organization of the selected infrastructure implementation comprise the respective associated industry. 9. The computer of claim 7 , wherein the respective statistics for the plurality of infrastructure implementations comprise: performance statistics; and reliability statistics. 10. The computer of claim 7 , wherein the computer-readable instructions further cause the computer to perform: determining a ranking of the selected infrastructure implementation based on a comparison of the respective statistics of each of the first particular implementations and the selected infrastructure implementation statistics. 11. The computer of claim 7 , wherein the respective statistics for the plurality of infrastructure implementations comprise energy consumption statistics. 12. The computer of claim 7 , wherein determining first particular implementations comparable to the selected infrastructure implementation further comprises: determining a market segment associated with the respective organization for the selected infrastructure implementation; and determining comparable infrastructure implementations based on the market segment, wherein the first particular implementations include the comparable infrastructure implementations. 13. A computer program product, comprising: a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program code embodied therewith, the computer-readable program code being operable, when executed, to: determine, by an infrastructure management process, a configuration of hosted applications in a deployment architecture for a selected infrastructure implementation that is provided for a particular organization associated with a particular industry; determine, by the infrastructure management process, first particular implementations comparable to the selected infrastructure implementation based on
Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data · CPC title
for systems · CPC title
for performance assessment · CPC title
Market surveys; Market polls · CPC title
Market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.