Reducing spontaneous emission in circuit quantum electrodynamics by a combined readout and filter technique
US-2016329896-A1 · Nov 10, 2016 · US
US9793913B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9793913-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715437043-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 20, 2017 |
| Priority date | Dec 17, 2015 |
| Publication date | Oct 17, 2017 |
| Grant date | Oct 17, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A probabilistic digitizer for extracting information from a Josephson comparator is disclosed. The digitizer uses statistical methods to aggregate over a set of comparator readouts, effectively increasing the sensitivity of the comparator even when an input signal falls within the comparator's gray zone. Among other uses, such a digitizer may be used to discriminate between states of a qubit.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: receiving a plurality of sample sets, with each sample set including N sequential samples; for each given sample set of the plurality of sample sets: estimating a probability p(j) of an output pulse being produced from a Josephson comparator based on the N sequential samples of the given sample set, and estimating an analog input current Ix(j) corresponding to the given sample set based on an inverse function of p(j) for the given sample set using a probability curve Prob(I x ); and extracting a signal from output of the Josephson comparator based, at least in part upon the analog input current I x (j) values respectively corresponding to the sample sets. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the inverse function is expressed by the following equation: I x (j)=Prob −1 (p(j)). 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: performing empirical calibration tests to determine the probability curve Prob(I x ). 4. The method of claim 1 further comprising: computing probability curve Prob(I x ) based on: (i) empirical or theoretical properties of the Josephson comparator, and (ii) operating conditions of the Josephson comparator. 5. The method of claim 1 wherein, for each given sample set, N is approximately equal to an fclk value for the given sample set divided by an fsig value for the given sample set. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein sampling is done at a higher frequency than the input signal rate/frequency. 7. A computer program product comprising: a machine readable storage device; and computer code stored on the machine readable storage device, with the computer code including instructions for causing a processor(s) set to perform operations including the following: receiving a plurality of sample sets, with each sample set including N sequential samples, for each given sample set of the plurality of sample sets: estimating a probability p(j) of an output pulse being produced from a Josephson comparator based on the N sequential samples of the given sample set, and estimating an analog input current I x (j) corresponding to the given sample set based on an inverse function of p(j) for the given sample set using a probability curve Prob(I x ); and extracting a signal from output of the Josephson comparator based, at least in part upon the analog input current I x (j) values respectively corresponding to the sample sets. 8. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein the inverse function is expressed by the following equation: I x (j)=Prob −1 (p(j)). 9. The computer program product of claim 7 further comprising: performing empirical calibration tests to determine the probability curve Prob(I x ). 10. The computer program product of claim 7 further comprising: computing probability curve Prob(I x ) based on: (i) empirical or theoretical properties of the Josephson comparator, and (ii) operating conditions of the Josephson comparator. 11. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein, for each given sample set, N is approximately equal to an fclk value for the given sample set divided by an fsig value for the given sample set. 12. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein sampling is done at a higher frequency than the input signal rate/frequency. 13. A computer system comprising: a processor(s) set; a machine readable storage device; and computer code stored on the machine readable storage device, with the computer code including instructions for causing the processor(s) set to perform operations including the following: receiving a plurality of sample sets, with each sample set including N sequential samples, for each given sample set of the plurality of sample sets: estimating a probability p(j) of an output pulse being produced from a Josephson comparator based on the N sequential samples of the given sample set, and estimating an analog input current I x (j) corresponding to the given sample set based on an inverse function of p(j) for the given sample set using a probability curve Prob(I x ); and extracting a signal from output of the Josephson comparator based, at least in part upon the analog input current I x (j) values respectively corresponding to the sample sets. 14. The computer system of claim 13 wherein the inverse function is expressed by the following equation: I x (j)=Prob −1 (p(j)). 15. The computer system of claim 13 further comprising: performing empirical calibration tests to determine the probability curve Prob(I x ). 16. The computer system of claim 13 further comprising: computing probability curve Prob(I x ) based on: (i) empirical or theoretical properties of the Josephson comparator, and (ii) operating conditions of the Josephson comparator. 17. The computer system of claim 13 wherein, for each given sample set, N is approximately equal to an fclk value for the given sample set divided by an fsig value for the given sample set. 18. The computer system of claim 13 wherein sampling is done at a higher frequency than the input signal rate/frequency.
Details of sampling arrangements or methods · CPC title
Sample-and-hold arrangements (G11C27/04 takes precedence) · CPC title
Measuring or testing · CPC title
Calibration · CPC title
of noise {(H03M1/0617 takes precedence)} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.