Intra-run design decision process for circuit synthesis

US9690900B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9690900-B2
Application numberUS-201514837102-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateAug 27, 2015
Priority dateJun 30, 2015
Publication dateJun 27, 2017
Grant dateJun 27, 2017

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A system and method of performing an intra-run decision during synthesis to determine a physical implementation of a system-on-chip (SoC) logic design are described. The method includes executing a stage of the synthesis with two or more scenarios, each scenario representing a unique combination of values of one or more parameters, and determining a quality measure associated with each of the two or more scenarios. The method also includes performing the intra-run decision by eliminating one or more of the two or more scenarios for execution in a subsequent stage of the synthesis based on the quality measure associated with each of the two or more scenarios.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method of performing an intra-run decision during synthesis to determine a physical implementation of a system-on-chip (SoC) logic design, the method comprising: executing, using a processor, a stage of the synthesis with two or more scenarios, each scenario representing a unique combination of values of one or more parameters; determining, using the processor, a quality measure associated with each of the two or more scenarios; and performing the intra-run decision using the processor, by eliminating one or more of the two or more scenarios for execution in a subsequent stage of the synthesis, the eliminating based on the quality measure associated with each of the two or more scenarios. 2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising generating the two or more scenarios based on a forking process that includes adding each new scenario specific to the stage to each previous scenario obtained from a previous stage of the synthesis. 3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the determining the quality measure includes determining a quality of results (QOR) measure. 4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the determining the QOR measure is based on timing, power consumption, and congestion resulting from each of the two or more scenarios. 5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the eliminating the one or more of the two or more scenarios includes eliminating any scenario with the associated quality measure below a threshold. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the eliminating the one or more of the two or more scenarios includes comparing the quality measure associated with each of the two or more scenarios with a baseline. 7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the eliminating the one or more of the two or more scenarios includes eliminating all but a specified number of the two or more scenarios with highest associated quality measures. 8. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising determining a total number of iterations for which to run one of the two or more scenarios based on the quality measure associated with each iteration or a runtime constraint.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Design verification, e.g. functional simulation or model checking · CPC title

  • G06F30/398Primary

    Design verification or optimisation, e.g. using design rule check [DRC], layout versus schematics [LVS] or finite element methods [FEM] (optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes G03F1/36) · CPC title

  • Physics · mapped topic

  • Physics · mapped topic

  • Physics · mapped topic

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9690900B2 cover?
A system and method of performing an intra-run decision during synthesis to determine a physical implementation of a system-on-chip (SoC) logic design are described. The method includes executing a stage of the synthesis with two or more scenarios, each scenario representing a unique combination of values of one or more parameters, and determining a quality measure associated with each of the t…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
IBM
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F30/398. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jun 27 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 3 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).