Automated inspection system
US-2024420305-A1 · Dec 19, 2024 · US
US2019079022A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2019079022-A1 |
| Application number | US-201715703937-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Sep 13, 2017 |
| Priority date | Sep 13, 2017 |
| Publication date | Mar 14, 2019 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Examination system, method and computer-readable medium, the method comprising: processing by a processor using a first recipe at least one image comprised in images and metadata generated by an inspection tool and stored, to detect a first location set of first potential defects and attributes thereof; selecting and imaging part of the first location set with a review tool to obtain an image set; obtaining classification results of said first potential defects and determining a further recipe based thereon; processing the image using the further recipe for detecting a further location set of further defects; selecting part of the further location set; imaging the part with the review tool to obtain a further image set, and obtaining further classification results; and repeating determining the further recipe, processing the image, selecting and imaging part of the further location set, and obtaining further classification results, until a stopping criteria is met.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . An examination system comprising: a defect detection system comprising a processing and memory circuitry (PMC) and configured to receive inspection data comprising at least one inspection image informative of potential defects of an object; and a review tool configured to review at least part of the potential defects, wherein the PMC is configured to: upon accommodation in a memory the received inspection data, process the at least one image using a first recipe to detect a first set of locations of first potential defects and attributes thereof; select at least part of the first set of locations and image the selected at least part of the first set of locations with a review tool to obtain a first set of review images; based on the first set of review images, obtain first classification results informative of classification of at least part of the first potential defects corresponding to the selected at least part of the first set of locations; determine a further recipe using the first classification results; process the at least one image using the further recipe to detect a further set of locations of further potential defects and attributes thereof; select at least part of the further set of locations and image the selected at least part of the further set of locations with a review tool to obtain a further set of review images; based on the further set of review images, obtain further classification results informative of classification of at least part of the further potential defects corresponding to the selected at least part of the further set of locations; and repeat determining a next further recipe, processing the at least one image to detect a next further set of locations of a next further potential defects and attributes thereof, selecting at least part of the next further set of locations, imaging the at least part of the next further set of locations, and obtaining next further classification results, until an examination stopping criteria is met. 2 . The examination system of claim 1 , wherein detecting the further set of locations comprises: segmenting the at least one image into segments in accordance with noise levels within each of the segments; determining a grade for elements within the segments, the grade indicative of a chance of each element to contain a defect; and detecting the further potential defects from elements within the segments in accordance with a threshold. 3 . The examination system of claim 1 , wherein an inspection tool providing the inspection data and the review tool are one examination tool operated at different modes. 4 . The examination system of claim 1 , wherein the PMC is a part of an inspection tool providing the inspection data. 5 . The examination system of claim 1 , wherein the PMC is a part of the review tool. 6 . The examination system of claim 1 , wherein the PMC is separate from the inspection tool and from the inspection tool. 7 . A method of examining an object using a processor operatively connected to a memory, the method comprising: processing, by the processor, using a first recipe at least one image to detect a first set of locations of first potential defects and attributes thereof, the at least one image comprised in inspection data generated by an inspection tool and stored in the memory; selecting, by the processor, at least part of the first set of locations and imaging by a review tool the selected at least part of the first set of locations with a review tool to obtain a first set of review images; based on the first set of review images, obtaining, by the processor, first classification results informative of classification of at least part of the first potential defects corresponding to the selected at least part of the first set of locations; determining, by the processor, a further recipe using the first classification results; processing, by the processor, the at least one image using the further recipe to detect a further set of locations of further potential defects and attributes thereof; selecting, by the processor, at least part of the further set of locations and imaging by the review tool the selected at least part of the further set of locations with a review tool to obtain a further set of review images; based on the further set of review images, obtaining, by the processor, further classification results informative of classification of at least part of the further potential defects corresponding to the selected at least part of the further set of locations; and repeating, by the processor, determining a next further recipe, processing the at least one image to detect a next further set of locations of a next further potential defects and attributes thereof, selecting at least part of the next further set of locations, imaging the at least part of the next further set of locations, and obtaining next further classification results, until an examination stopping criteria is met. 8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein detecting the further set of locations comprises: segmenting the at least one image into segments in accordance with noise levels within each of the segments; determining a grade for elements within the segments, the grade indicative of a chance of each element to contain a defect; and detecting the further potential defects from elements within the segments in accordance with a threshold. 9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein at least one element is selected from the group consisting of: a pixel; a group of pixels; a feature and a geometrical area. 10 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the further set of locations does not include a location from a previous set of locations. 11 . The method of claim 7 , further comprising repeating selecting at least part of the further set of locations and obtaining further classification results, until a selection stopping criteria is met. 12 . The method of claim 11 wherein the selection stopping criteria is selected from the group consisting of: all further set of locations have been reviewed; and a representative selection from the further set of locations has been reviewed. 13 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the examination stopping criteria is selected from the group consisting of: time allotted for examination is over; a number of review operations has reached a threshold; a number of true defects determined has reached a predetermined threshold; and a number of true defects determined on a previous one or more collections has decreased below a predetermined threshold. 14 . The method of claim 7 , wherein classification is into a true defect or a non-defect. 15 . The method of claim 7 , wherein classification is into a severe defect, a non-severe defect, a nuisance, or a false alarm. 16 . The method of claim 7 , wherein obtaining the further recipe uses classification results obtained with any previous recipe. 17 . A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform a method of examination of a semiconductor specimen, the method comprising: processing, by the processor, using a first recipe at least one image to detect a first set of locations of first potential defects and attributes thereof, the at least one image comprised in inspection data generated by an inspection tool and stored in the memory; selecting, by the processor, at least part of the first set of locations and imaging by a review tool the selected at least part of the first set of locations with a review tool to obtain a first set of review
Visual inspection (measuring projectors G01B9/08) · CPC title
Semiconductor wafers (manufacturing processes per se of semiconductor devices implementing a measuring step H10P74/20) · CPC title
using sequentially two or more inspection runs, e.g. coarse and fine, or detecting then analysing · CPC title
using a design-rule based approach · CPC title
Semiconductor; IC; Wafer · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.