Quality control method for optometric measurements

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2016353985-A1
Application number	US-201415034301-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Oct 17, 2014
Priority date	Nov 8, 2013
Publication date	Dec 8, 2016
Grant date	—

Abstract

A quality control method for optometric measurements includes the following steps: (a) recording, via computer, a first record ( 14 ) that includes at least one first value of a first identifier ( 12 ), enabling identification of a glasses wearer ( 1 ), and at least one other value of another identifier ( 13 ) enabling identification of an optometric apparatus ( 15 ) on a first optometric measuring site ( 10 ); (b) carrying out at least one optometric measurement ( 16 ) of the wearer; (c) sending, to a second site ( 20 ), a digital measurement data set ( 18 ) including the optometric measurement result from step (b), the digital data set being linked, via computer, to the first record; and (d) digitally processing the optometric measurement result from the first record ( 14 ) on the basis of a digital data reference system ( 45 ) and the values of the respective identifiers of the glasses wearer and the optometric apparatus of the first record.

First claim

1 . A method for controlling the quality of optometric measurements for determining the optical-mechanical properties and the quality of a corrective spectacle lens suitable for a spectacle wearer, the controlling method comprising the following steps:
(a) computationally recording a first recording comprising at least one first value of a first identifier allowing a spectacle wearer to be identified and at least one other value of another identifier allowing an optometric apparatus at a first optometric measurement site to be identified; (b) carrying out, by means of the optometric apparatus of the first site, at least one optometric measurement comprising at least one measurement of an ocular refraction parameter of the spectacle wearer and/or a measurement of horizontal and vertical positions of the pupil of the eye of this wearer relative to a frame intended to accommodate the corrective lens, the wearer being identified in the first recording; (c) transmitting to a second site a numerical measurement dataset comprising the optometric measurement result of step (b), the numerical dataset being computationally associated with the first recording; and (d) digitally processing the optometric measurement result computationally associated with the first recording depending on numerical reference data and/or the values of the respective identifiers of the spectacle wearer and the optometric apparatus of the first recording.

2 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein step (d) comprises a step of calibrating said optometric measurement result.

3 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein step (d) comprises the following step:
(d1) assigning at least one evaluation criterion to the optometric measurement result, the evaluation criterion depending on the values of the first recording.

4 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein step (d) comprises the following step:
(d2) assigning at least one given evaluation criterion to a cluster associated with a plurality of optometric apparatuses and/or a plurality of optometric measurement sites.

5 . The method as claimed in claim 3 , furthermore comprising a step of transmitting the at least one evaluation criterion to the first optometric measurement site and/or to the optometric apparatus or respectively to said plurality of optometric apparatuses and/or to said plurality of optometric measurement sites.

6 . The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein step (d) includes a step of recording the evaluation criterion in a database.

7 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the first recording is recorded in a database at the end of step (a), the numerical measurement dataset is recorded in the same database at the end of step (b) and the result of the digital processing is recorded in the same database at the end of step (d).

8 . The method as claimed in claim 6 wherein step (c) of transmitting the numerical measurement dataset includes a step of recording a digital signature in the first recording of the database.

9 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , furthermore comprising a step of calculating a deviation between the optometric measurement result and the numerical reference data and a step of transmitting this deviation to the first optometric measurement site and/or to the optometric apparatus.

10 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the numerical reference data comprise at least one evaluation criterion representative of the respect of a pre-established measurement protocol, of the reproducibility of the optometric apparatus, of the qualifications of a technician operating the optometric apparatus, of the type of optometric apparatus and/or of the complexity of the optometric measurements.

11 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , furthermore comprising at least one other execution, this other execution being associated with the same first identifier value corresponding to the same spectacle wearer.

12 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , comprising a step of certifying the first and/or second site depending on a digital signature assigned to the first and/or second site, respectively.

13 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , furthermore comprising the following steps:
(e) determining a numerical visual-correction prescription dataset of a new corrective lens depending on the numerical dataset of the signed measurements; (f) having the numerical visual-correction prescription dataset digitally signed and validated by a professional qualified to prescribe the refraction powers of a new corrective lens; (g) transmitting to a third site the numerical prescription dataset associated with the first identifier of the wearer and with a signature attached to the qualified professional; and (h) certifying the signature transmitted in the preceding step and transmitting the result of this certification to the third site.

14 . The method as claimed in claim 13 , furthermore comprising the following step:
(i) generating at the third site a digital corrective-lens order dataset triggering the manufacture of this eyeglass.

15 . The method as claimed in claim 14 , furthermore comprising the following step:
(j) selecting the optical design or the category of the optical design or adapting the calculation of the design depending on the signature attached to the qualified professional.

16 . The method as claimed in claim 15 , furthermore comprising the following steps:
(k) computationally recording an image file of a pre-existing visual-correction prescription of the wearer associated with the first identifier of the wearer; (l) transmitting to the second site a numerical measurement dataset comprising the result of the measurement of step (b) and the image file of a pre-existing prescription, which are associated with the first identifier of the wearer and with a signature attached to the first site or to the optometric apparatus; and (m) determining by processing of the image file of a pre-existing prescription the numerical visual-correction prescription dataset comprising the three refraction powers of the new corrective lens.

17 . The method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein step (c) of transmitting the numerical measurement dataset includes a step of recording a digital signature in the first recording of the database.

18 . The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein step (d) comprises the following step:
(d2) assigning at least one given evaluation criterion to a cluster associated with a plurality of optometric apparatuses and/or a plurality of optometric measurement sites.

19 . The method as claimed in claim 18 , wherein step (d) includes a step of recording the evaluation criterion in a database.

20 . The method as claimed in claim 19 , wherein the first recording is recorded in a database at the end of step (a), the numerical measurement dataset is recorded in the same database at the end of step (b) and the result of the digital processing is recorded in the same database at the end of step (d).

Assignees

• Essilor Int

Inventors

• Haddadi Ahmed
• Berthezene Marie-Anne
• Poulain Isabelle
• Petignaud Cecile
• Levraud Loic
• Gayat Sebastien
• Divo Fabien
• Rousseau Benjamin

Classifications

• A61B5/0022

  Monitoring a patient using a global network, e.g. telephone networks, internet · CPC title

• G02C13/005 Primary

  Measuring geometric parameters required to locate ophtalmic lenses in spectacles frames (apparatus for testing or instruments for examining the eyes per se A61B3/00; machines or devices and accessories for grinding the edges of lenses using spectacles as a template B24B9/144) · CPC title

• A61B3/0025 Primary

  characterised by electronic signal processing, e.g. eye models · CPC title

• A61B3/103

  for determining refraction, e.g. refractometers, skiascopes · CPC title

• G16H10/60

  for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records · CPC title