Neuronal cell cultures as compute substrates
US-2024386258-A1 · Nov 21, 2024 · US
US2016203262A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016203262-A1 |
| Application number | US-201414913925-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Aug 21, 2014 |
| Priority date | Aug 23, 2013 |
| Publication date | Jul 14, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present invention relates to a system and method for calculating a quality index of a differentiated cell. To calculate the quality index, the present invention measures a differentiated cell by at least one metric, calculates a strictly standardized mean difference between the differentiated cell and a targeted cell, and calculates a mean squared error versus the target cell to define a value that represents the total difference between the differentiated cell and targeted cell based on the at least one measured metric.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A method for calculating a quality index of a differentiated cell, comprising: measuring a differentiated cell by at least one metric; calculating a normalized residue between the differentiated cell and a targeted cell; and calculating a mean squared error (MSE) versus the target cell to define a value that represents the total difference between the differentiated cell and targeted cell based on the at least one measured metric. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one metric is selected from the group consisting of genetic information, electrophysiological information, structural information, and contractile information. 3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the at least one metric comprises genetic information, electrophysiological information, structural information, and contractile information. 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the normalized residue is a strictly standardized mean difference (β). 5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein β is calculated according to the formula: β = μ 1 - μ 2 σ 1 2 + σ 2 2 where μ represents mean and σ represents standard deviation. 6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein MSE is calculated according to the formula: MSE = 1 n ∑ i = 1 n β i 2 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the differentiated cell is derived from a potent cell. 8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the potent cell is a stem cell. 9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the differentiated cell is a myocyte. 10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the at least one metric is a sarcomere packing density. 11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein information pertaining to the targeted cell is a predetermined value related to the at least one metric. 12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a lower MSE value is indicative of greater similarity between the differentiated cell and the targeted cell. 13 . A system for calculating a quality index of a differentiated cell, comprising a software platform run on a computing device that calculates a normalized residue between a differentiated cell and a targeted cell, and calculates a mean squared error (MSE) versus the target cell to define a value that represents the total difference between the differentiated cell and targeted cell based on at least one measured metric of the differentiated cell. 14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the normalized residue is a strictly standardized mean difference (β). 15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein β is calculated according to the formula: β = μ 1 - μ 2 σ 1 2 + σ 2 2 where μ represents mean and σ represents standard deviation. 16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein MSE is calculated according to the formula: MSE = 1 n ∑ i = 1 n β i 2 17 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one metric is selected from the group consisting of genetic information, electrophysiological information, structural information, and contractile information. 18 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the at least one metric comprises genetic information, electrophysiological information, structural information, and contractile information. 19 . The system of claim 13 , wherein a lower MSE value is indicative of greater similarity between the differentiated cell and the targeted cell. 20 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the differentiated cell is derived from a potent cell. 21 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the potent cell is a stem cell. 22 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the differentiated cell is a myocyte. 23 . The system of claim 21 , wherein the at least one metric is a sarcomere packing density.
for testing the pathological state of an organism · CPC title
involving human or animal cells (immunoassay G01N33/56966; immunoassays of protozoa G01N33/56905; protozoa in screening assays C12Q1/025) · CPC title
ICT specially adapted for biostatistics; ICT specially adapted for bioinformatics-related machine learning or data mining, e.g. knowledge discovery or pattern finding · CPC title
Stem cells · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.