Chemical mechanical polishing method
US-2015375361-A1 · Dec 31, 2015 · US
US2016176012A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016176012-A1 |
| Application number | US-201414576841-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Dec 19, 2014 |
| Priority date | Dec 19, 2014 |
| Publication date | Jun 23, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The invention provides a polishing pad suitable for planarizing at least one of semiconductor, optical and magnetic substrates. The polishing pad is a cast polyurethane polymeric matrix formed from an isocyanate-terminated molecule and a curative agent. The cast polyurethane polymeric matrix contains 4.2 to 7.5 weight percent fluid-filled microspheres in the isocyanate-terminated molecule. The fluid-filled-microspheres is polymeric and has an average diameter of 10 to 80 μm and the polishing pad having a conditioner sensitivity (CS) of 0 to 2.6.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A polishing pad suitable for planarizing at least one of semiconductor, optical and magnetic substrates, the polishing pad comprising a cast polyurethane polymeric matrix formed from an isocyanate-terminated molecule and a curative agent, the cast polyurethane polymeric matrix containing 4.2 to 7.5 weight percent fluid-filled microspheres in the isocyanate-terminated molecule, the fluid-filled-microspheres being polymeric and having an average diameter of 10 to 80 μm, the polishing pad having a conditioner sensitivity (CS) of 0 to 2.6 with CS defined as follows: CS = RR 75 % In - situ Conditioning - RR 50 % In - situ Conditioning RR 50 % In - situ Conditioning where CS is defined as blanket TEOS removal rate difference at 75% in-situ conditioning (RR 75% In-situ Conditioning ) and blanket TEOS removal rate at 50% in-situ conditioning (RR 50% In-situ Conditioning ) divided by the blanket TEOS removal rate at 50% partial in-situ conditioning using a fumed silica slurry having a 0.1 μm average particle size at a 12.5 wt % concentration with a pH of 10.5 and a diamond conditioner with a 150 μm average particle size, a 400 μm pitch and a 100 μm protrusion at a conditioner downforce of 9 lbs (or 4.08 Kg). 2 . The polishing pad of claim 1 wherein the curative contains 4,4′-methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline) (MbOCA). 3 . The polishing pad of claim 1 the curative contains a blend of 4,4′-methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline) (MbOCA) and a multifunctional polyol. 4 . The polishing pad of claim 1 wherein the polishing pad has a density of 0.5 to 0.75 g/cm 3 . 5 . The polishing pad of claim 1 wherein the fluid-filled-microspheres have an average diameter of 20 to 60 μm. 6 . A polishing pad suitable for planarizing at least one of semiconductor, optical and magnetic substrates, the polishing pad comprising a cast polyurethane polymeric matrix formed from a urethane prepolymer of H 12 MDI/TDI with polytetramethylene ether glycol (PTMEG) having an unreacted NCO of 8.95 to 9.25 wt % and a curative agent, the cast polyurethane polymeric matrix containing 4.2 to 7.5 weight percent fluid-filled microspheres in the urethane prepolymer, the fluid-filled-microspheres being polymeric and having an average diameter of 10 to 80 μm, the polishing pad having a conditioner sensitivity (CS) of 0 to 2.6 with CS defined as follows: CS = RR 75 % In - situ Conditioning - RR 50 % In - situ Conditioning RR 50 % In - situ Conditioning where CS is defined as blanket TEOS removal rate difference at 75% in-situ conditioning (RR 75% In-situ Conditioning ) and blanket TEOS removal rate at 50% in-situ conditioning (RR 50% In-situ Conditioning ) divided by the blanket TEOS removal rate at 50% partial in-situ conditioning using a fumed silica slurry having a 0.1 μm average particle size at a 12.5 wt % concentration with a pH of 10.5 and a diamond conditioner with a 150 μm average particle size, a 400 μm pitch and a 100 μm protrusion at a conditioner downforce of 9 lbs (or 4.08 Kg). 7 . The polishing pad of claim 6 wherein the curative contains 4,4′-methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline) (MbOCA). 8 . The polishing pad of claim 6 the curative contains a blend of 4,4′-methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline) (MbOCA) and a multifunctional polyol. 9 . The polishing pad of claim 6 wherein the polishing pad has
involving a dielectric removal step · CPC title
containing two or more cycloaliphatic rings · CPC title
containing oxyethylene end groups · CPC title
characterised by the composition or properties of the pad materials · CPC title
Polyethers containing oxyalkylene groups having four carbon atoms in the alkylene group · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.