Neural Network Models For Real-Time Optimization of Drilling Parameters During Drilling Operations
US-2021148213-A1 · May 20, 2021 · US
US12559128B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12559128-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117165770-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 2, 2021 |
| Priority date | Feb 2, 2021 |
| Publication date | Feb 24, 2026 |
| Grant date | Feb 24, 2026 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer implemented method for determining optimal values for operational parameters for a model predictive controller for controlling a vehicle can receive from a data store or a graphical user interface, ranges for one or more operational parameters. The computer implemented method can determine optimum values for vehicle parameters of the vehicle of one or more other parameters by simulating a vehicle operation across the ranges of the one or more operational parameters by solving a vehicle control problem and determining an output of the vehicle control problem based on a result for the simulated vehicle operation. A vehicle can include a processing component configured to adjust a control input for an actuator of the vehicle according to a control algorithm and based on the optimum values of a parameter as determined by the computer implemented method.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A computer implemented method for determining optimal operational parameters for a model predictive controller for controlling a vehicle, the method comprising: receiving, at a hardware processor, from a data store or a graphical user interface, a range of one or more operational parameters; determining by a trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit, an optimum value for a vehicle parameter, wherein the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit is trained by: simulating, by a vehicle control circuit, a vehicle operation across the range of the one or more operational parameters by solving a model predictive control problem, wherein the vehicle operation comprises stabilizing the vehicle in a stabilization maneuver, wherein the range of the one or more operational parameters stabilizes the vehicle during the simulation within a minimum value and a maximum value of the range, and wherein the minimum and maximum values of the range are boundaries of operational constraints of the vehicle; determining, by the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit, an output of the model predictive control problem, the output based on a result for the simulated vehicle operation; and updating the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit based on the output by updating training data with the optimum value for the vehicle parameter; and controlling, by the hardware processor, operation of an actuator of the vehicle based on an adjusted control input obtained based on the optimum value for the vehicle parameter. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operational parameters comprise the vehicle parameter. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the vehicle parameter comprises one or more of: a distance a from the center of gravity (CG) to a front axle of the vehicle, a distance b from the center of gravity (CG) to a rear axle of the vehicle, a distance L from the center of the front axle to the center of the rear axle of the vehicle, a tire distance from the CG to the rear axle of the vehicle, a vehicle speed V x , a vehicle yaw rate r, a vehicle sideslip angle β, a front steering angle δ, front and rear lateral tire forces F yf and F yr , a vehicle mass m, a yaw inertia I zz a height h of the vehicle's CG, a wheel radius R, a cornering stiffness C, a front axle cornering stiffness C af , or a rear axle cornering stiffness C ar . 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operational parameters comprise at least one external parameter; the at least one external parameter selected from a group consisting of: a friction coefficient between at least one tire and a road, a gravitational constant, a road surface roughness, an external humidity, a wind vector, and an external temperature. 5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the at least one external parameter is measurable by a vehicle outside of simulation and wherein the optimum value is determined by the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit for other parameters. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the vehicle operation further comprises at least one of a corridor keeping or collision avoidance maneuver, and the optimum value for the vehicle parameter corresponds to a value of the vehicle parameter which was determined by the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit to allow for the vehicle to at least one of keep within the corridor in the corridor keeping maneuver, or maneuver to avoid vehicle collision in the collision avoidance maneuver. 7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating a training set of optimum values for one or more operational parameters based on the optimum value for the vehicle parameter, wherein the training set of optimum one or more operational parameters is configured to be used as an initial parameter set for a model predictive controller operating on a vehicle. 8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the vehicle operation comprises at least one of a corridor keeping or collision avoidance maneuver, and wherein the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit is trained by: simulating, by the vehicle control circuit, the vehicle operation across a full range of the one or more operational parameters by solving the model predictive control problem for at least one of the corridor keeping or collision avoidance maneuver; and determining the optimum value for a first parameter based on an outcome of the corridor keeping or collision avoidance maneuver during simulation. 9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises: determining by the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit, the optimum value for vehicle parameter based on the one or more operational parameters. 10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operational parameters further comprise one or more controls parameters. 11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the one or more controls parameters further comprise one or more of a gain Q on a vehicle state, a gain R on an input to the model predictive controller, or a gain W on a slack to the vehicle state. 12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the gain Q on the vehicle state, the gain R on the input, or the gain W on the slack, are gains based on the vehicle parameter. 13 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the operational parameters comprise: the vehicle parameter selected from a group consisting of: a distance a from the center of gravity (CG) to a front axle of the vehicle, a distance b from the center of gravity (CG) to a rear axle of the vehicle, a distance L from the center of the front axle to the center of the rear axle of the vehicle, a tire distance from the CG to the rear axle of the vehicle, a vehicle speed V x , a vehicle yaw rate r, a vehicle sideslip angle β, a front steering angle δ, front and rear lateral tire forces F yf and F yr , a vehicle mass m, a yaw inertia I zz , a height h of the vehicle's CG, a wheel radius R, a cornering stiffness C, a front axle cornering stiffness C af , a rear axle cornering stiffness C ar ; and a controls parameter comprising a gain for the model predictive controller. 14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the operational parameters further comprise an external parameter selected from a group consisting of: a friction coefficient between at least one tire and a road, a gravitational constant, a road surface roughness, an external humidity, a wind vector, and an external temperature. 15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the minimum and maximum values of the range are determined using a vehicle envelope comprising the operational constraints. 16 . A vehicle, comprising: a processing component configured to adjust a control input for an actuator of the vehicle according to a control algorithm comprising a model predictive control problem which controls the control input based on a current vehicle state, predicted boundaries for values of operational parameters, and based on a future vehicle state determined based on the predicted boundaries of values for one or more operational parameters; a data store coupled to the processing component, wherein the data store comprises a value for a vehicle parameter for execution of the control algorithm; wherein the processing component is configured to adjust the control input based on the value for the vehicle parameter; wherein the value for the vehicle parameter was received by the processing component by a vehicle simulation system; and wherein the
Generating training patterns; Bootstrap methods, e.g. bagging or boosting · CPC title
Active safety systems} predicting or avoiding probable or impending collision {or attempting to minimise its consequences · CPC title
Machine learning · CPC title
Control of vehicle driving stability · CPC title
using classification, e.g. of video objects · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.