Vehicle control based on a dynamically configured sideslip limit
US-12358509-B2 · Jul 15, 2025 · US
US12515639B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12515639-B2 |
| Application number | US-202118287496-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 26, 2021 |
| Priority date | Apr 26, 2021 |
| Publication date | Jan 6, 2026 |
| Grant date | Jan 6, 2026 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer-implemented method performed in a vehicle control unit for controlling motion of a heavy-duty vehicle, the method comprising obtaining a vehicle motion request, wherein the vehicle motion request is indicative of a target curvature creq and a target acceleration areq, determining a motion support device (MSD) control allocation (Ti/λi/ωi/δi) based on the vehicle motion request, determining a dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit (λlim/ωlim) based on the vehicle motion request and separately from the MSD control allocation, where the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit increases with a decreasing target curvature, and controlling the motion of the heavy-duty vehicle based on the MSD control allocation constrained by the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1 . A computer-implemented method performed in a vehicle control unit for controlling motion of a heavy-duty vehicle, the method comprising: obtaining a vehicle motion request, wherein the vehicle motion request is indicative of a target curvature and a target acceleration; determining a motion support device (MSD) control allocation based on the vehicle motion request; determining a dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit based on the vehicle motion request and separately from the MSD control allocation, where the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit increases with a decreasing target curvature, and where the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit is determined by minimizing local Hamiltonian functions at one or more wheels; and controlling the motion of the heavy-duty vehicle based on the MSD control allocation constrained by the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit. 2 . The method of claim 1 , comprising obtaining the vehicle motion request from a driver input and/or from an autonomous or semi-autonomous traffic situation management (TSM) function. 3 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining the MSD control allocation based on a B-matrix control allocation method. 4 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining the MSD control allocation at least partly as a target wheel torque. 5 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining the MSD control allocation at least partly as a target wheel slip or wheel speed relative to ground. 6 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining the MSD control allocation at least partly as a target steering angle. 7 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit based on a current wheel slip angle and on a required lateral force, where the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit decreases if the current wheel slip angle increases. 8 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining a dynamic steering angle limit in addition to the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit. 9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each minimization of local Hamiltonian functions at one or more wheels comprises a linear search of a tire force curve. 10 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit based on a stability condition involving a maximum acceptable yaw moment of the vehicle. 11 . A computer program product comprising program code for performing, when executed by a computer, the steps of claim 1 . 12 . A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising a computer program comprising program code, which when executed by a computer, performs the steps of claim 1 . 13 . A control unit, comprising: processing circuitry; an interface coupled to the processing circuitry; and a memory coupled to the processing circuitry, wherein the memory comprises machine readable computer program instructions that, when executed by the processing circuitry, causes the control unit to perform operations of: obtaining a vehicle motion request, wherein the vehicle motion request is indicative of a target curvature and a target acceleration; determining a motion support device (MSD) control allocation based on the vehicle motion request; determining a dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit based on the vehicle motion request and separately from the MSD control allocation, where the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit increases with a decreasing target curvature, and where the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit is determined by minimizing local Hamiltonian functions at one or more wheels; and controlling the motion of the heavy-duty vehicle based on the MSD control allocation constrained by the dynamic longitudinal wheel slip limit. 14 . A heavy-duty vehicle comprising the control unit of claim 13 .
Wheel torque · CPC title
Wheel slip · CPC title
Heavy duty trucks · CPC title
Cornering · CPC title
Curve braking control, e.g. turn control within ABS control algorithm · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.