Semiconductor fabrication process parameter determination using a generative adversarial network
US-2021303757-A1 · Sep 30, 2021 · US
US12450520B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12450520-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117641214-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 1, 2021 |
| Priority date | Mar 1, 2021 |
| Publication date | Oct 21, 2025 |
| Grant date | Oct 21, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
For a machine learning model that receives control parameters of a semiconductor processing device and outputs shape parameters that express a processed shape of a semiconductor sample processed by the semiconductor processing device, an experiment point obtaining learning data is recommended. A contribution of each control parameter to the prediction of the machine learning model is evaluated from feature quantity data that is a value of a control parameter of the learning data used for learning of the machine learning model, and the experiment point is recommended based on a stability evaluation and an uncertainty evaluation of the prediction by the machine learning model in a space defined by the control parameters selected based on the contribution as axes.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. An experiment point recommendation device that recommends an experiment point that is a combination of values of control parameters set in a semiconductor processing device for an experiment to obtain learning data of a machine learning model that receives control parameters of the semiconductor processing device and outputs shape parameters that express a processed shape of a semiconductor sample processed by the semiconductor processing device, the experiment point recommendation device comprising: a storage device that stores a contribution calculation program, a stability calculation program, an uncertainty calculation program, and an experiment point recommendation program; and a processor that executes the programs read from the storage device, wherein the processor executes the contribution calculation program to evaluate the contribution of each control parameter to the prediction of the machine learning model from feature quantity data that is the value of the control parameter of the learning data used for learning of the machine learning model, the processor executes the stability calculation program to evaluate the stability of prediction by the machine learning model in a first space defined by control parameters selected based on the contribution as axes based on whether or not a change of the value of the selected control parameters causes an abnormal change in the prediction of the machine learning model, the processor executes the uncertainty calculation program to evaluate the uncertainty of prediction by the machine learning model in a second space defined by the selected control parameters as axes based on a distribution of the feature quantity data in the second space, and the processor executes the experiment point recommendation program to recommend an experiment point based on the contribution evaluation, the stability evaluation, and the uncertainty evaluation of the selected control parameters to the prediction of the machine learning model. 2. The experiment point recommendation device according to claim 1 , wherein in the second space, a contribution conversion value of the control parameter is used as a unit of the value of the selected control parameter as the axis, and the contribution conversion value is calculated as a value obtained by assigning the value of the shape parameter predicted by the machine learning model based on the contribution evaluation of the control parameter. 3. The experiment point recommendation device according to claim 2 , wherein in the first space, the unit of the control parameter is used as the unit of the value of the selected control parameter as the axis, and the processor executes the experiment point recommendation program to convert the stability evaluation of the prediction by the machine learning model in the first space into the stability evaluation of the prediction by the machine learning model in the second space, and displays an important area based on the contribution evaluation, the stable area based on the stability evaluation, and the uncertain area based on the uncertainty evaluation in the second space. 4. The experiment point recommendation device according to claim 3 , wherein the uncertain area is an area included in a range of the uncertainty evaluation specified by the user. 5. The experiment point recommendation device according to claim 3 , wherein the second space in which the important area, the stable area, and the uncertain area are displayed is displayed on a user terminal, and the processor executes the experiment point recommendation program to identify a point specified in the second space displayed on the user terminal by the user as an experiment point. 6. The experiment point recommendation device according to claim 2 , wherein in the first space, the unit of the control parameter is used for the unit of the value of the selected control parameter as the axis, and the processor executes the experiment point recommendation program to convert the stability evaluation of the prediction by the machine learning model in the first space into the stability evaluation of the prediction by the machine learning model in the second space, obtain an integrated score based on the value of the stability evaluation and the value of uncertainty in the second space, and specify an experiment point based on the integrated score. 7. An experiment point recommendation method that recommends an experiment point that is a combination of values of control parameters set in a semiconductor processing device for an experiment to obtain learning data of a machine learning model that receives control parameters of the semiconductor processing device and outputs shape parameters that express a processed shape of a semiconductor sample processed by the semiconductor processing device, the method comprising: a first step of evaluating the contribution of each control parameter to the prediction of the machine learning model from feature quantity data that is the value of the control parameter of the learning data used for learning of the machine learning model; a second step of evaluating the stability of prediction by the machine learning model in a first space defined by control parameters selected based on the contribution as axes based on whether or not a change of the value of the selected control parameters causes an abnormal change in the prediction of the machine learning model; a third step of evaluating the uncertainty of prediction by the machine learning model in a second space defined by the selected control parameters as axes based on a distribution of the feature quantity data in the second space; and a fourth step of recommending an experiment point based on the contribution evaluation, the stability evaluation, and the uncertainty evaluation of the selected control parameters to the prediction of the machine learning model. 8. The experiment point recommendation method according to claim 7 , wherein in the second space, a contribution conversion value of the control parameter is used as a unit of the value of the selected control parameter as the axis, and the contribution conversion value is calculated as a value obtained by assigning the value of the shape parameter predicted by the machine learning model based on the contribution evaluation of the control parameter. 9. The experiment point recommendation method according to claim 8 , wherein in the first space, the unit of the control parameter is used as the unit of the value of the selected control parameter as the axis, and in the fourth step, the stability evaluation of the prediction by the machine learning model in the first space is converted into the stability evaluation of the prediction by the machine learning model in the second space, and an important area based on the contribution evaluation, a stable area based on the stability evaluation, and an uncertain area based on the uncertainty evaluation are displayed in the second space. 10. The experiment point recommendation method according to claim 9 , wherein the uncertain area is an area included in a range of the uncertainty evaluation specified by the user. 11. The experiment point recommendation method according to claim 9 , wherein the second space in which the important area, the stable area, and the uncertain area are displayed is displayed on a user terminal, and in the fourth step, a point specified in the second space displayed on the user terminal by the user is identified as an experiment point. 12. The experiment point recommendation method according to claim 8 , wherein in the first space, the unit of the
Testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment of wafers, substrates or devices · CPC title
Generic processes or apparatus for manufacture or treatments not covered by the other groups of this subclass · CPC title
Explanation of inference; Explainable artificial intelligence [XAI]; Interpretable artificial intelligence · CPC title
Machine learning · CPC title
characterised by multiple measurements, corrections, marking or sorting processes · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.