Over-the-air testing of millimeter wave antenna arrays
US-11515950-B2 · Nov 29, 2022 · US
US12235305B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12235305-B2 |
| Application number | US-202318311329-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 3, 2023 |
| Priority date | May 3, 2023 |
| Publication date | Feb 25, 2025 |
| Grant date | Feb 25, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system and method for testing an antenna-under-test (AUT). A multi-probe antenna array receiver is moved to a plurality of positions within a scan area. At each position, each probe antenna element of the receiver receives a near-field (NF) over-the-air (OTA) signal from the AUT. An alignment procedure is performed to align reception locations for signals received by different ones of the plurality of probe antenna elements. Correction factors are determined that characterize amplitude and phase discrepancies between the probe antenna elements of the receiver. The correction factors are applied to the received signals, and the corrected signals are combined at each reception location to obtain average signals. A far-field (FF) transmission pattern for the AUT is determined based on a discrete Fourier transform of the average signals and stored in a non-transitory computer readable memory medium.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for testing an antenna-under-test (AUT), the method comprising: at each respective position, j, of a plurality of positions within a scan area: receiving, by a respective probe antenna element of a plurality of probe antenna elements of a receiver, a respective near-field (NF) over-the-air (OTA) signal from the AUT as an electric field vector, {right arrow over (E)}(i,j), wherein i denotes the respective probe antenna element and j denotes the respective position; performing an alignment procedure to align reception locations for signals received by different ones of the plurality of probe antenna elements; determining a plurality of respective correction factors that characterize amplitude and phase discrepancies between a first reference probe antenna element of the plurality of probe antenna elements and respective second probe antenna elements of the plurality of probe antenna elements; applying the plurality of respective correction factors to the NF OTA signals received by the respective second probe antenna elements to obtain respective corrected signals; for each respective reception location within the scan area, combining the corrected signals received at the respective reception location to obtain a respective average signal; determining a far-field (FF) transmission pattern for the AUT based at least in part on the average signals; and storing the FF transmission pattern in a non-transitory computer readable memory medium. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein performing the alignment procedure comprises: at each respective position, j, of the plurality of positions: receiving, by each respective probe antenna element of the plurality of probe antenna elements, a respective NF OTA calibration signal from a calibration antenna as an electric field vector, {right arrow over (E)} c (i,j), wherein i denotes the respective probe antenna element and j denotes the respective position; identifying a reference reception location where the reference probe antenna element received a first calibration signal; identifying respective second reception locations where respective second probe antenna elements received respective second calibration signals that correspond to the first calibration signal; and aligning the reception locations based on differences between the reference reception location and the respective second reception locations. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the first and second calibration signals comprise: largest amplitude NF OTA calibration signals received by the reference probe antenna element and the second probe antenna elements, respectively; or centers of concentric iso-phase curves within the scan area for scan maps of the reference probe antenna element and the second probe antenna elements, respectively. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the plurality of respective correction factors comprises: identifying a reference signal received by the reference probe antenna element at a reference reception location; identifying respective second signals received by the second probe antenna elements at the reference reception location; and determining the respective correction factors based at least in part on respective differences between a reference amplitude and phase of the reference signal and respective amplitudes and phases of the respective second signals. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein identifying the reference signal comprises identifying that the reference signal comprises a highest signal-to-noise ratio of all NF OTA signals received by the reference antenna. 6. The method of claim 4 , wherein determining the respective correction factors based at least in part on the respective differences between the reference amplitude and phase of the reference signal and respective amplitudes and phases of the respective second signals comprises: determining a reference average of the reference amplitude and phase and a first plurality of amplitudes and phases of NF OTA signals received by the reference probe antenna element in a first region surrounding the reference reception location; for each of the second probe antenna elements, determining a respective second average of the respective amplitude and phase of the respective second signal and a respective second plurality of amplitudes and phases of signals received by the respective second probe antenna element in the first region; and determining the respective correction factors based on respective differences between the reference average and the respective second averages. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the receiver comprises a probe antenna system (PAS). 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein combining the corrected signals received at the respective reception locations to obtain the respective average signals comprises performing a weighted average of the corrected signals, wherein the weighted average is weighted based at least in part on a signal-to-noise ratio of the corrected signals. 9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: at each respective position, j, of the plurality of positions: receiving, by each respective probe antenna element of the plurality of probe antenna elements, a respective OTA calibration signal from a calibration antenna as an electric field vector, {right arrow over (E)} c (i,j), wherein i denotes the respective probe antenna elements and j denotes the respective position, wherein the respective OTA calibration signals comprise omnidirectional OTA signals; performing probe compensation, wherein performing probe compensation comprises, for each respective probe antenna element of the plurality of probe antenna elements: correcting for amplitude and phase discrepancies for signals received by the respective probe antenna element at different reception locations. 10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining a modal probe compensation spectrum, comprising: determining a first modal representation of a spatial map of the respective average signals; determining a second modal representation of a spatial map of a plurality of calibration signals, wherein the second modal representation is obtained via far-field measurements; and determining the modal probe compensation spectrum based at least in part on a difference between the first and second modal representations; and applying the modal probe compensation spectrum to the average signals to obtain probe-compensated average signals, wherein determining the FF transmission pattern for the AUT based at least in part on the average signals comprises performing a discrete Fourier transform on the probe-compensated average signals. 11. A system for testing an antenna-under-test (AUT), the system comprising: a non-transitory computer-readable memory medium; a processor coupled to the memory medium; a receiver comprising an array of a plurality of probe antenna elements, wherein the system is configured to: at each respective position, j, of a plurality of positions within a scan area: receive, by each respective probe antenna element of the plurality of probe antenna elements, a respective near-field (NF) over-the-air (OTA) signal from the AUT as an electric field vector, {right arrow over (E)}(i,j), wherein i denotes the respective probe antenna element and j denotes the respective position; perform an alignment procedure to align reception locations for signals received by different ones of the plurality of probe antenna elements; determine a plurality of respective correction factors that characterize amplitude and phase discrepancies between a first reference probe antenna element of the plurality of
Complete apparatus or systems; circuits, e.g. receivers or amplifiers (G01R29/0878, G01R29/0892 take precedence; dosimeters, warning devices G01R29/0857) · CPC title
Radiation diagrams of antennas · CPC title
Details related to signal analysis or treatment; presenting results, e.g. displays; measuring specific signal features other than field strength, e.g. polarisation, field modes, phase, envelope, maximum value · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.