Metrology data correction using image quality metric

US12189307B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-12189307-B2
Application numberUS-201917268863-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateAug 14, 2019
Priority dateAug 17, 2018
Publication dateJan 7, 2025
Grant dateJan 7, 2025

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A method for correcting metrology data of a patterning process. The method includes obtaining (i) metrology data of a substrate subjected to the patterning process and (ii) a quality metric (e.g., a focus index) that quantifies a quality of the metrology data of the substrate; establishing a correlation between the quality metric and the metrology data; and determining a correction to the metrology data based on the correlation between the quality metric and the metrology data.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method for correcting metrology data of a patterning process, the method comprising: obtaining (i) metrology data of a substrate subjected to the patterning process and (ii) an image quality metric that quantifies how well a metrology tool has been able to produce an image from which the metrology data is measured or otherwise obtained; establishing, via a hardware computing system, a correlation between the image quality metric and the metrology data; and determining, via the computing system, a correction to the metrology data based on the correlation between the image quality metric and the metrology data. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the correction comprises determining a corrected value of the metrology data based on a correction model. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the corrected value is determined based on a slope of the correlation between the image quality metric and the metrology data, and a difference between a maximum value of the image quality metric across the substrate and a value of the image quality metric at a point of interest on the substrate. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the image quality metric is a focus index of an image of the substrate captured via the metrology tool. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the focus index is determined based on a local phase coherence map that reveals a phase relationship, in a vicinity of a feature location on the substrate, between neighbouring wavelet coefficients in a scale-space. 6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the focus index is determined based on a sample selected from the image that has a relatively higher gradient compared to other locations on the image. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the sample is an area of the image that has a relatively high gradient compared to remaining areas of the image. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the image quality metric is independent of variations in a dose used in the patterning process. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the metrology data comprises an image of a printed substrate, or a parameter of the patterning process. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the metrology data comprises a parameter of the patterning process and the parameter of the patterning process is a critical dimension, an edge placement error, or an overlay. 11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating a map of a parameter of the patterning process based on the correction applied to the metrology data. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the map is a dose map, a focus map, a critical dimension (CD) map, an overlay map, or an edge placement error map. 13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the metrology data is a scanning electron microscope image, or an e-beam image. 14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising training a correction model based on the correlation between the image quality metric and the metrology data, wherein the correction model is configured to determine real-time corrections to metrology data collected during the patterning process. 15. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions therein, the instructions, when executed by a computer system, configured to cause the computer system to at least: obtain (i) metrology data of a substrate subjected to a patterning process and (ii) an image quality metric that quantifies how well a metrology tool has been able to produce an image from which the metrology data is measured or otherwise obtained; establish a correlation between the image quality metric and the metrology data; and determine a correction to the metrology data based on the correlation between the image quality metric and the metrology data. 16. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the computer system to determine the correction are further configured to cause the computer system to determine the correction based on a slope of the correlation between the image quality metric and the metrology data, and a difference between a maximum value of the image quality metric across the substrate and a value of the image quality metric at a point of interest on the substrate. 17. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the image quality metric is a focus index of an image of the substrate captured via the metrology tool. 18. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the image quality metric is independent of variations in a dose used in the patterning process. 19. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to generate a map of a parameter of the patterning process based on the correction applied to the metrology data. 20. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to train a correction model based on the correlation between the image quality metric and the metrology data, wherein the correction model is configured to determine real-time corrections to metrology data collected during the patterning process.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Generating training patterns; Bootstrap methods, e.g. bagging or boosting · CPC title

  • with scanning beams {(H01J37/268, H01J37/292, H01J37/2955 take precedence)} · CPC title

  • Image quality inspection · CPC title

  • Semiconductor; IC; Wafer · CPC title

  • Training; Learning · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US12189307B2 cover?
A method for correcting metrology data of a patterning process. The method includes obtaining (i) metrology data of a substrate subjected to the patterning process and (ii) a quality metric (e.g., a focus index) that quantifies a quality of the metrology data of the substrate; establishing a correlation between the quality metric and the metrology data; and determining a correction to the metro…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Asml Netherlands Bv
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G03F7/70633. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jan 07 2025 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).