Automated root cause analysis for defect detection during fabrication processes of semiconductor structures

US12045969B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-12045969-B2
Application numberUS-202017034640-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateSep 28, 2020
Priority dateOct 1, 2019
Publication dateJul 23, 2024
Grant dateJul 23, 2024

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A method includes obtaining at least one 2-D image dataset of semiconductor structures formed on a wafer including one or more defects during a wafer run of a wafer using a predefined fabrication process. The method also includes determining, based on at least one machine-learning algorithm trained on prior knowledge of the fabrication process and based on the at least one 2-D image dataset, one or more process deviations of the wafer run from the predefined fabrication process as a root cause of the one or more defects. A 3-D image dataset may be determined as a hidden variable.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method, comprising: during a wafer run of a wafer using a predefined fabrication process, obtaining a 2-D image dataset of 3-D semiconductor structures formed on the wafer, the wafer comprising a defect of one of the 3-D semiconductor structures; using a machine-learning algorithm to determine, based on the 2-D image dataset, a probability distribution of multiple 3-D image datasets imaging the defect, the probability distribution assigning probabilities to each of the multiple 3-D image datasets; responsive to the probability distribution of the multiple 3-D image datasets comprising equal probabilities for two or more of the multiple 3-D image datasets due to ambiguity of a projection the 3-D semiconductor structures into an imaging plane of the 2-D image dataset, obtaining a further 2-D image dataset of the 3-D semiconductor structures to reduce the ambiguity, the 2-D image dataset and the further 2-D image dataset depicting the 3-D semiconductor structures using different poses; and based on at least one of the 3-D image datasets, determining a process deviation of the wafer run from the predefined fabrication process as a root cause of the defect of the one of the 3-D semiconductor structures. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine-learning algorithm is trained on the prior knowledge of the predefined fabrication process. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, prior to the wafer run and during a development phase of the predefined fabrication process, using invasive imaging to train the machine-learning algorithm, wherein the invasive imaging yields 3-D image datasets of the semiconductor structures. 4. A device, comprising: control circuitry configured to: during a wafer run of a wafer using a predefined fabrication process, obtain a 2-D image dataset of 3-D semiconductor structures formed on the wafer, the wafer comprising a defect of one of the 3-D semiconductor structures; use a machine-learning algorithm to determine, based on the 2-D image dataset, a probability distribution of multiple 3-D image datasets imaging the defect, the probability distribution assigning probabilities to each of the multiple 3-D image datasets; responsive to the probability distribution of the multiple 3-D image datasets comprising equal probabilities for two or more of the multiple 3-D image datasets due to ambiguity of a projection the 3-D semiconductor structures into an imaging plane of the 2-D image dataset, obtain a further 2-D image dataset of the 3-D semiconductor structures to reduce the ambiguity, the 2-D image dataset and the further 2-D image dataset depicting the 3-D semiconductor structures using different poses; and based on at least one of the 3-D image data sets, determine a process deviation of the wafer run from the predefined fabrication process as a root cause of the defect of the one of the 3-D semiconductor structures. 5. A system, comprising: control circuitry configured to: during a wafer run of a wafer using a predefined fabrication process, obtain a 2-D image dataset of 3-D semiconductor structures formed on the wafer, the wafer comprising a defect of one of the 3-D semiconductor structures; and use a machine-learning algorithm to determine, based on the 2-D image dataset, a probability distribution of multiple 3-D image datasets imaging the defect, the probability distribution assigning probabilities to each of the multiple 3-D image datasets; responsive to the probability distribution of the multiple 3-D image datasets comprising equal probabilities for two or more of the multiple 3-D image datasets due to ambiguity of a projection the 3-D semiconductor structures into an imaging plane of the 2-D image dataset, obtain a further 2-D image dataset of the 3-D semiconductor structures to reduce the ambiguity, the 2-D image dataset and the further 2-D image dataset depicting the 3-D semiconductor structures using different poses; and based on at least one of the 3-D image datasets, determine a process deviation of the wafer run from the predefined fabrication process as a root cause of the defect of the one of the 3-D semiconductor structures; and production equipment configured to implement the predefined fabrication process. 6. The system of claim 5 , further comprising an image source. 7. The system of claim 5 , further comprising at least one microscope selected from the group consisting of an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope. 8. One or more machine-readable hardware storage devices comprising instructions that are executable by one or more processing devices to perform operations comprising the method of claim 1 . 9. A system comprising: one or more processing devices; and one or more machine-readable hardware storage devices comprising instructions that are executable by the one or more processing devices to perform operations comprising the method of claim 1 . 10. The system of claim 5 , further comprising: an image source; and an interface, wherein the image source is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the interface, and the interface is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the control circuitry. 11. The system of claim 5 , further comprising: an optical microscope; and an interface to the interface, wherein the optical microscope is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the interface, and the interface is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the control circuitry. 12. The system of claim 11 , further comprising: a scanning electron microscope; and an interface to the interface, wherein the scanning electron microscope is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the interface, and the interface is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the control circuitry. 13. The system of claim 5 , further comprising: a scanning electron microscope; and an interface to the interface, wherein the scanning electron microscope is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the interface, and the interface is configured to provide the 2-D image dataset to the control circuitry. 14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using an image source to collect the 2-D image dataset. 15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising using production equipment to implement the predefined fabrication process. 16. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using an optical microscope to collect the 2-D image dataset. 17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising using a scanning electron microscope to collect the 2-D image dataset. 18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising using production equipment to implement the predefined fabrication process. 19. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using a scanning electron microscope to collect the 2-D image dataset. 20. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using production equipment to implement the predefined fabrication process.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • comprising acting in response to an ongoing measurement without interruption of processing, e.g. endpoint detection or in-situ thickness measurement · CPC title

  • Training; Learning · CPC title

  • Semiconductor; IC; Wafer · CPC title

  • from scanning electron microscope · CPC title

  • Artificial neural networks [ANN] · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US12045969B2 cover?
A method includes obtaining at least one 2-D image dataset of semiconductor structures formed on a wafer including one or more defects during a wafer run of a wafer using a predefined fabrication process. The method also includes determining, based on at least one machine-learning algorithm trained on prior knowledge of the fabrication process and based on the at least one 2-D image dataset, on…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Zeiss Carl Smt Gmbh
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06T7/0004. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jul 23 2024 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 6 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).