Driving support device
US-2017072853-A1 · Mar 16, 2017 · US
US12012123B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12012123-B2 |
| Application number | US-202218072939-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 1, 2022 |
| Priority date | Dec 1, 2021 |
| Publication date | Jun 18, 2024 |
| Grant date | Jun 18, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system for impact-based operation of an autonomous agent (equivalently referred to herein as an ego agent and autonomous vehicle) includes and/or interfaces with a computing subsystem (equivalently referred to herein as a computer and/or set of computers). A method for impact-based operation of an autonomous agent includes: receiving a set of inputs; predicting a set of future scenarios; and determining a set of metrics based on the set of future scenarios. Additionally or alternatively, the method can include operating the autonomous agent based on the set of metrics and/or any other processes.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A method for impact-based operation of an autonomous vehicle, the method comprising: collecting data from a set of sensors associated with the autonomous vehicle; detecting a set of environmental objects in an environment of the autonomous vehicle based on the data; performing a set of forward simulations comprising representations of the set of environmental objects, the set of forward simulations comprising: a 1 st subset of simulations, comprising multiple simulations, wherein in the 1 st subset of simulations, a representation of the autonomous vehicle is present; a 2 nd subset of simulations, comprising multiple simulations, wherein the multiple simulations of the 2 nd subset differ in an estimated intent assigned to the set of environmental objects represented in the multiple simulations, wherein in each of the 2 nd subset of simulations, the representation of the autonomous vehicle is absent; determining an impact score of the ego vehicle on the environment, comprising: calculating a 1 st set of metric values based on the 1 st subset of simulations; calculating a 2 nd set of second metric values based on the 2 nd subset of simulations; comparing the 1 st set of metric values with the 2 nd set of metric values; and determining the impact score based on the comparison; operating the ego vehicle based on the impact score. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the 1 st set of metric values with the 2 nd set of metric values comprises calculating a difference between the 1 st set of metric values and the 2 nd set of metric values, wherein the difference represents a quantified impedance of progress of the environmental objects as caused by the autonomous vehicle. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein each of the 1 st and 2 nd sets of metric values is determined based on a derivative of velocity of the environmental objects in the set of forward simulations. 4. The method of claim 2 , wherein each of the 1 st and 2 nd sets of metric values is determined based on a distance traveled by the environmental objects in the set of forward simulations. 5. The method of claim 2 , further comprising applying a scaling factor to the difference based on a set of features associated with the set of environmental objects. 6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the set of features comprises at least one of: a determination an environmental object of the set of environmental objects does not have a right-of-way privilege in a scenario present in the set of forward simulations; a determination that the environmental object is arranged behind the autonomous vehicle; and a determination that the environmental vehicle is located above a predetermined distance threshold from the autonomous vehicle. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the scaling factor decreases the value of the difference. 8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a set of multiple impact scores, wherein the set of multiple impact scores comprises the impact score, wherein operating the autonomous vehicle based on the impact score comprises selecting a policy from a set of multiple policy options for the autonomous vehicle based on the set of multiple impact scores. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the policy is further selected based on a reward score associated with the autonomous vehicle, wherein the reward score represents the progress of the autonomous vehicle relative to an autonomous vehicle goal. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the autonomous vehicle goal comprises a distance to a destination of the autonomous vehicle. 11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the autonomous vehicle goal comprises an amount of work exerted by the autonomous vehicle to reach a destination associated with the autonomous vehicle. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the environmental objects comprise a set of vehicles and a set of pedestrians located in a field-of-view of the set of sensors. 13. A system for impact-based operation of an autonomous vehicle, the system comprising: a data collection subsystem comprising a set of sensors; a computing subsystem comprising a memory and a processor in communication with the data collection subsystem, wherein the computing subsystem: collects data from the data collection subsystem; processes the data to detect a set of environmental objects in an environment on the autonomous vehicle; a simulator that performs a set of forward simulations, the set of forward simulations comprising: a 1 st subset of simulations, comprising multiple simulations, wherein in the 1 st subset of simulations, a representation of the autonomous vehicle is present; a 2 nd subset of simulations, comprising multiple simulations, wherein the multiple simulations of the 2 nd subset differ in an estimated intent assigned to the set of environmental objects represented in the multiple simulations, wherein in each of the 2 nd subset of simulations, the representation of the autonomous vehicle is absent; a controller configured to maneuver the autonomous vehicle based on a set of instructions received from the computing subsystem, wherein the computing subsystem: determines the set of instructions based on an impact of the autonomous vehicle on the set of environmental objects, wherein determining the impact comprises: calculating a 1 st set of metric values based on the 1 st subset of simulations; calculating a 2 nd set of second metric values based on the 2 nd subset of simulations; comparing the 1 st set of metric values with the 2 nd set of metric values; and determining the impact based on the comparison. 14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the simulator is part of the computing subsystem. 15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the computing subsystem is located onboard the autonomous vehicle. 16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the simulator performs the set of forward simulations throughout a trip of the autonomous vehicle. 17. The system of claim 16 , wherein simulations of the set of forward simulations are performed according to a predetermined frequency. 18. The system of claim 13 , wherein comparing the 1 st set of metric values with the 2 nd set of metric values comprises calculating a difference between the 1 st set of metric values and the 2 nd set of metric values, wherein the difference represents a quantified impedance of progress of the environmental objects as caused by the autonomous vehicle. 19. The system of claim 18 , wherein each of the 1 st and 2 nd sets of metric values is determined based on a derivative of velocity of the environmental objects in the set of forward simulations. 20. The system of claim 18 , wherein each of the 1 st and 2 nd sets of metric values is determined based on a distance traveled by the environmental objects in the set of forward simulations.
Handing over between on-board automatic and on-board manual control · CPC title
only part of driving tasks shifted to occupants · CPC title
Handover processes (Handing over between remote control and on-board control or handing over between remote control arrangements G05D1/227) · CPC title
Predicting future conditions · CPC title
Mathematical models, e.g. for simulation · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.