Technology to generalize safe driving experiences for automated vehicle behavior prediction
US-11702105-B2 · Jul 18, 2023 · US
US11975725B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11975725-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117165801-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 2, 2021 |
| Priority date | Feb 2, 2021 |
| Publication date | May 7, 2024 |
| Grant date | May 7, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer implemented method for determining optimal values for operational parameters for a model predictive controller for controlling a vehicle, can receive from a data store or a graphical user interface, ranges for one or more external parameters. The computer implemented method can determine optimum values for external parameters of the vehicle by simulating a vehicle operation across the ranges of the one or more operational parameters by solving a vehicle control problem and determining an output of the vehicle control problem based on a result for the simulated vehicle operation. A vehicle can include a processing component configured to adjust a control input for an actuator of the vehicle according to a control algorithm and based on the optimum values of the vehicle parameter as determined by the computer implemented method.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer implemented method for determining optimal operational parameters for a model predictive controller for controlling a vehicle, the method comprising: receiving, at a hardware processor, from a data store or a graphical user interface, a range of values for one or more operational parameters, the one or more operational parameters comprising one or more external parameters; and determining, by a trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit, optimum values for the one or more operational parameters amongst the range of values of the one or more operational parameters, wherein the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit is trained by: simulating, by a vehicle control circuit, a vehicle operation across the range of values of the one or more operational parameters by solving a vehicle control problem; determining, by the machine learning vehicle performance circuit, an output of the vehicle control problem, the output based on a result for the simulated vehicle operation; and updating the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit based on the output. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more external parameters are selected from a group consisting of: a friction coefficient between at least one tire and a road, a gravitational constant, a road surface roughness, an external humidity, a wind vector, and an external temperature. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operational parameters further comprise at least one or more vehicle parameter. 4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the one or more vehicle parameter is selected from a group consisting of a distance a from a center of gravity (CG) to a front axle of the vehicle, a distance b from the center of gravity (CG) to a rear axle of the vehicle, a distance L from the center of the front axle to the center of the rear axle of the vehicle, a tire distance from the CG to the rear axle of the vehicle, a vehicle speed V x , a vehicle yaw rate r, vehicle sideslip angle β, front steering angle δ, front and rear lateral tire forces F yf and F yr , a vehicle mass m, a yaw inertia I zz , a height h of the vehicle's CG, a wheel radius R, a cornering stiffness C, a front axle cornering stiffness C af , or a rear axle cornering stiffness C ar . 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determined optimum values of the one or more operational parameters are for parameters which are not directly measurable by a vehicle outside of simulation, and wherein the vehicle operation is simulated across a range of one or more parameters which are parameters which are directly measurable by a vehicle. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the vehicle operation comprises at least one of a path tracking, corridor keeping, stabilization, or collision avoidance maneuver, and optimum values for the one or more operational parameters correspond to the values of the parameters which were determined by the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit to allow for the vehicle to at least one of: (i) track the path in the path tracking maneuver, (ii) remain within the corridor in the corridor keeping maneuver, (iii) stabilize the vehicle in the stabilization maneuver, or (iv) maneuver to avoid vehicle collision in the collision avoidance maneuver. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating a training set of optimum one or more operational parameters, wherein the training set of optimum one or more operational parameters is configured to be used as an initial parameter set for a model predictive controller operating on a vehicle. 8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the vehicle operation comprises at least one of a path tracking, corridor keeping, stabilization, or collision avoidance maneuver, and wherein the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit is trained by: simulating, by the vehicle control circuit, the vehicle operation across a full range of the one or more operational parameters by solving a model predictive control problem for at least one of the path tracking, corridor keeping, stabilization, or collision avoidance maneuver; and determining the optimum value for one of the parameter based on outcome of the path tracking, corridor keeping, stabilization, or collision avoidance maneuver during simulation. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operational parameters comprises a first external parameter and one or more other parameters; and determining by a trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit, optimum values for the one or more operational parameters further comprises: determining by the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit, a value for the first external parameter based on the one or more other parameters. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operational parameters further comprise at least one controls parameter. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the vehicle control problem comprises the model predictive controller, and wherein the one or more controls parameters comprise one or more of a gain Q on a vehicle state, a gain R on an input to the model predictive controller, or a gain W on a slack to the vehicle state. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the operational parameters further comprise a vehicle parameter, and the gain Q on the vehicle state, the gain R on the input, or the gain W on the slack, are gains based on the one or more vehicle parameters. 13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the vehicle operation comprises at least one of a path tracking, corridor keeping, stabilization, or collision avoidance maneuver, and optimum values for the one or more operational parameters correspond to the values of the controls parameters which were determined by the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit to allow for the vehicle to at least one of: (i) track the path in the path tracking maneuver, (ii) remain within the corridor in the corridor keeping maneuver, (iii) stabilize the vehicle in a stabilization maneuver, or (iv) maneuver the vehicle to avoid vehicle collision in the collision avoidance maneuver. 14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the vehicle control problem comprises a model predictive control problem which controls a control input for an actuator of the vehicle based on: a current vehicle state; predicted boundaries for values of the one or more operational parameters; and a future vehicle state determined based on the predicted boundaries for values of the one or more operational parameters. 15. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining, by the trained machine learning vehicle performance circuit, an optimum value for an external parameter of the one or more external parameters amongst a range of values of the external parameter; and simulating, by the vehicle control circuit, the vehicle operation across the range of values of the one or more external parameters by solving a vehicle control problem. 16. A vehicle, comprising: a processing component configured to adjust a control input for an actuator of the vehicle according to a control algorithm; and a data store coupled to the processing component, wherein the data store contains a value for an external parameter for execution of the control algorithm; wherein the processing component is configured to adjust the control input based on the value for the external parameter; wherein the value for the external parameter was received by the processing component by a vehicle simulation system; and wherein the vehicle simulation system generated the value for the ex
Predicting future conditions · CPC title
Control of vehicle driving stability · CPC title
Taking automatic action to avoid collision, e.g. braking and steering · CPC title
Path keeping {(cruise control for automatically following a preceding vehicle B60W30/165)} · CPC title
Road friction coefficient · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.