Dynamic tolerance curves for power monitoring systems
US-2020011908-A1 · Jan 9, 2020 · US
US11961386B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11961386-B2 |
| Application number | US-202217894728-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 24, 2022 |
| Priority date | Feb 24, 2020 |
| Publication date | Apr 16, 2024 |
| Grant date | Apr 16, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer-implemented method for determining an operational state of an industrial plant includes acquiring alarms raised within the plant and adding them to a pool of important alarms, determining whether a physical state of the plant indicated by a first alarm causes a second alarm or meets a predetermined state-dependent condition and, if so, moving the first alarm to a pool of informative alarms; and determining the operational state of the plant and/or a corrective action for improving this operational state based on the alarms in the pool of important alarms.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for determining an operational state of an industrial plant, wherein the industrial plant is configured to execute a given industrial process, the method comprising: acquiring a plurality of alarms raised within the plant, adding the plurality of alarms to a pool of important alarms; determining, based at least in part on a topology of the plant, and/or on the given industrial process, and/or on a physical state of the plant or any part thereof, for at least one first acquired alarm from the plurality of alarms, whether a physical state of the plant or any part thereof indicated by the at least one first acquired alarm has caused a second alarm that has also been acquired, wherein the second alarm represents an escalation of an initial problem indicated by the at least one first acquired alarm that needs fixing more urgently than the initial problem, and when the second alarm is present, moving the at least one first acquired alarm from the pool of important alarms to a pool of informative alarms; and determining the operational state of the plant, and/or a corrective action for improving this operational state, based on the alarms in the pool of important alarms. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining, based at least in part on the topology of the plant, and/or on the given industrial process, in combination with a physical state of the plant or any part thereof, for the at least one first acquired alarm, whether a predetermined state-dependent condition is met, and at times when the pre-determined state-dependent condition is met, moving the at least one first acquired alarm from the pool of important alarms to the pool of informative alarms. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein each alarm in the plurality of alarms is labeled with a priority and wherein the second acquired alarm caused by a state indicated by the at least one first acquired alarm has a higher priority than the at least one first acquired alarm. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of alarms comprises at least: alarms from a first category of service alarms that are raised in response to a service or an operation in the industrial plant being interrupted or being unable to start; and alarms from a second category of process alarms that are raised upon a predetermined condition being met for one or more physically acquired variables of the plant or any part thereof, wherein the first category of service alarms has a higher priority than the second category of process alarms. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the service or operation specifically comprises one or more of: heating or cooling a substance, and/or keeping the temperature of the substance at a desired value; stirring a substance; filling at least one vessel with a desired amount of a substance; discharging a desired amount of a substance from at least one vessel; dosing a desired amount of a second substance into a first substance; intermixing a mixture of two or more substances by mechanical interaction with this mixture; distilling at least one substance from a mixture of two or more substances; transitioning at least one substance; and inertizing at least one substance. 6. The method of claim 4 , wherein at least one process alarm is specifically raised in response to a temperature, a pressure, and/or a mass flow deviating from a nominal value or going beyond an upper or lower threshold value. 7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the determining whether a process alarm has caused a service alarm is based at least in part on a set of rules, wherein each rule specifies that in response to one or more process alarms, a service alarm is to be raised. 8. The method of claim 7 , wherein at least one rule in the set of rules is generated by: determining that a service or operation utilizes at least one resource of the plant; and for at least one process alarm that this resource is able to raise, creating a rule that in response to this process alarm being raised, a service alarm is to be raised. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the process alarm that the resource is able to raise specifically relates to a state variable on which the functioning of the service depends. 10. The method of claim 7 , wherein at least one rule in the set of rules is generated by: determining that a service or operation requires a particular state of the plant or any part thereof; determining, based at least in part on the topology of the plant, and/or on the given industrial process, that the raising of a particular process alarm will cause the plant or any part thereof to switch to a state that is different from said required state; and creating a rule that in response to said process alarm being raised, a service alarm is to be raised. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein it is specifically determined based at least in part on a safety or interlock function in the topology of the plant that the raising of a particular process alarm will cause the plant or any part thereof to switch to a state that is different from said required state. 12. The method of claim 4 , wherein at least one service in the industrial plant specifically is a service provided by a process module of the industrial plant, and process alarms that will trigger a service alarm of this service specifically are process alarms that are raised upon a predetermined condition being met within the same process module. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein at least one process alarm is specifically raised in response to a temperature, a pressure, and/or a mass flow deviating from a nominal value or going beyond an upper or lower threshold value, and wherein at least one rule in the set of rules is generated based at least in part on metadata of a process module interface. 14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the metadata of the process module interface specifically comprises at least one rule in the set of rules. 15. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether a physical state of the plant or any part thereof indicated by the at least one first acquired alarm has caused the second acquired alarm specifically comprises simulating a behavior of the plant in response to the physical state. 16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the simulating specifically includes state changes triggered by a safety or interlock function in a topology of the plant in response to the state indicated by the at least one first acquired alarm. 17. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: rendering representations of the alarms in the pool of important alarms on at least one display device. 18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising: providing, in association with a representation of at least one alarm in the pool of important alarms, at least one hyperlink to another alarm that has been moved to the pool of informative alarms by virtue of having caused the important alarm. 19. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: rendering, on at least one display device, at least one representation of a physical state that has caused the moving of at least one alarm from the pool of important alarms to the pool of informative alarms. 20. The method of claim 19 , further comprising: providing, in association with the representation of the physical state, a hyperlink to at least one alarm that has been moved to the pool of informative alarms by virtue of this state. 21. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: in response to at least one alarm i
Alarms responsive to unspecified undesired or abnormal conditions · CPC title
Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] · CPC title
Status alarms (G08B21/02 takes precedence) · CPC title
Presentation of monitored results, e.g. selection of status reports to be displayed; Filtering information to the user · CPC title
Alarm filtering, level and direct precursor, required action, blocking condition · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.