Dynamic tolerance curves for power monitoring systems

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2020011908-A1
Application number	US-201816137603-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Sep 21, 2018
Priority date	Jul 6, 2018
Publication date	Jan 9, 2020
Grant date	—

Abstract

A method for managing power quality events in an electrical system includes processing electrical measurement data captured by an intelligent electronic device (IED) to identify at least one power quality event associated with one or more loads monitored by the IED. The IED and the loads are installed at respective locations in the electrical system. The method also includes determining an impact of the at least one identified power quality event on one or more of the loads, and using the at least one identified power quality event and the determined impact to generate a tolerance curve associated with the one or more of the loads. The tolerance curve characterizes a tolerance level of the loads to certain power quality events. The loads can include one or more loads “downstream” from the IED in the electrical system and/or one or more loads “upstream” from IED in the electrical system.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1 . A method for managing power quality events in an electrical system, the method comprising:
processing electrical measurement data from voltage and/or current signals captured by an intelligent electronic device (IED) to identify at least one power quality event associated with one or more loads monitored by the IED, wherein the IED and the loads are installed at respective locations in the electrical system; determining an impact of the at least one identified power quality event on one or more of the loads; and using the at least one identified power quality event and the determined impact of the at least one identified power quality event to generate or update a tolerance curve associated with the one or more of the loads, wherein the tolerance curve characterizes a tolerance level of the loads to certain power quality events.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein using the at least one identified power quality event and the determined impact of the at least one identified power quality event to generate or update a tolerance curve associated with the one or more of the loads, comprises:
for a first power quality event of the at least one identified power quality event that is identified at a first time, using the first power quality event and the determined impact of the first power quality event to generate a tolerance curve associated with the one or more of the loads; and for a next power quality event of the at least one identified power quality event that is identified at a next, later time than the first time, using the next power quality event and the determined impact of the next power quality event to update the tolerance curve.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the loads monitored by the IED comprise a plurality of loads, and wherein determining an impact of the at least one identified power quality event on one or more of the loads comprises: determining an impact of the at least one identified power quality event on the plurality of loads, wherein at least one of the plurality of loads is positioned at a location that is downstream relative to the IED in the electrical system.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the at least one of the plurality of loads that is downstream relative to the IED is positioned closer to a terminus of the electrical system than the IED.

5 . The method of claim 3 , wherein at least one of the plurality of loads is positioned at a location that is upstream relative to the IED in the electrical system.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the at least one of the plurality of loads that is upstream relative to the IED is closer to an input of the electrical system than the IED.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the input of the electrical system is coupled to a power source.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein processing electrical measurement data from voltage and/or current signals captured by the IED to identify the at least one power quality event comprises: processing electrical measurement data on the IED to identify the at least one power quality event.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the at least one power quality event comprises:
identifying at least one of: (a) a power quality event type of the at least one power quality event, (b) a magnitude of the at least one power quality event, (c) a location of the at least one power quality event in the electrical system, and (d) a duration of the at least one power quality event.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the identified power quality event type includes one of a voltage sag, a voltage swell, a voltage transient, an instantaneous interruption, a momentary interruption, a temporary interruption, and a long-duration root-mean-square (rms) variation.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the electrical measurement data is continuously or semi-continuously processed and the tolerance curve is dynamically updated in response to detected power quality events.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the impact of the at least one identified power quality event comprises:
measuring one or more first parameters associated with the loads at a first time; measuring one or more second parameters associated with the loads at a second time; comparing the first parameters to the second parameters to determine the impact of the at least one identified power quality event on the loads.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the first parameters are substantially the same as the second parameters.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the first and second parameters include energy-related parameters.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the energy-related parameters include at least one of voltage, current, energy, real power, apparent power, reactive power, harmonic power, individual phase currents, three-phase currents, phase voltages, and line voltages.

16 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the first time corresponds to a time prior to the at least one identified power quality event.

17 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the second time corresponds to a time during the at least one identified power quality event.

18 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the second time corresponds to a time after the at least one identified power quality event.

19 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the impact of the at least one identified power quality event comprises:
determining a time for the loads to recover from the at least one identified power quality event.

20 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the impact of the at least one identified power quality event comprises:
determining a magnitude and a duration of the at least one identified power quality event.

21 . The method of claim 1 , wherein using the at least one identified power quality event and the determined impact of the at least one identified power quality event to generate a tolerance curve associated with the one or more of the loads, comprises:
providing an indication of the at least one identified power quality event in the tolerance curve, wherein the at least one identified power quality event is characterized as either an impactful power quality event or a non-impactful power quality event based on the determined impact of the at least one power quality event.

22 . The method of claim 1 , wherein using the at least one identified power quality event and the determined impact of the at least one identified power quality event to generate a tolerance curve associated with the one or more of the loads, comprises:
generating a tolerance curve for each of the loads monitored by the IED.

23 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
dynamically customizing the tolerance curve so that it reflects voltage event tolerance characteristics at the IED's location in the electrical system, wherein the at least one identified power quality event includes a voltage event.

24 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: displaying the tolerance curve in at least one of a graphical user interface (GUI) of a control system used for controlling one or more parameters associated with the electrical system, and a GUI of the IED.

25 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining an impact of the at least one identified power quality event on the electrical system, and updating the tolerance curve to indicate the determined impact of the at least one ide

Assignees

• Schneider Electric Usa Inc

Inventors

• Bickel Jon A

Classifications

• H02J3/00 Primary

  Circuit arrangements for AC mains or AC distribution networks · CPC title

• H02H1/0061

  concerning transmission of signals (transmission of measured quantities or switching orders; sectionalised protection involving signal transmission between at least two stations H02H7/261; comparison of the voltage or current values at two spaced portions of a single system H02H3/28; transferring the output of a sensing member to another variable G01D5/00; electrical measuring arrangements using modulation of electromagnetic waves, e.g. light beams G01R15/24, G01R15/26) · CPC title

• H02J2103/30

  Simulating, planning, modelling, reliability check or computer assisted design [CAD] of electric power networks · CPC title

• H02J13/36

  specially adapted for protection systems · CPC title

• H02J13/12

  Monitoring network conditions, e.g. electrical magnitudes or operational status · CPC title