Multiaxis sensing using metal organic frameworks
US-9546887-B1 · Jan 17, 2017 · US
US11513100B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11513100-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816479675-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 26, 2018 |
| Priority date | Jan 27, 2017 |
| Publication date | Nov 29, 2022 |
| Grant date | Nov 29, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A gas sensor ( 100,200 ) includes at least one sensor device including a surface acoustic wave (SAW) device ( 110 ) or a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) device ( 210 ), and a layer of metal organic framework (MOF) material ( 120,220 ) disposed on each of the at least one sensor device. The at least one sensor device is structured to sense a change in mass of the MOF material.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A gas sensor comprising: at least one sensor device including a surface acoustic wave (SAW) device; and a layer of metal organic framework (MOF) material disposed on each of the at least one sensor device, wherein the at least one sensor device is structured to sense a change in mass of the MOF material, wherein the at least one sensor device is a plurality of sensor devices arranged in an array, and wherein the plurality of sensor devices includes a first sensor device having a first layer of MOF material disposed thereon and a second sensor device having a second layer of MOF material disposed thereon, wherein the first MOF material and the second MOF material are different. 2. The gas sensor of claim 1 , wherein the metal organic framework includes at least one of IRMOF-1, HKUST-1, NU-125, UiO-66, and ZIF-8. 3. The gas sensor of claim 1 , wherein the sensor device includes the SAW device, and wherein the layer of MOF material has a thickness within a range of about 100-300 nm. 4. The gas sensor of claim 1 , wherein the sensor device incudes the QCM device ( 210 ), and wherein the layer of MOF material ( 220 ) has a thickness within a range of about 100-300 nm. 5. The gas sensor of claim 1 , wherein the first layer of MOF material is composed of HKUST-1 and the second layer of MOF material is composed of UiO-66, and wherein the plurality of sensor devices includes a third sensor device having a third layer of material composed of ZIF-8. 6. The gas sensor of claim 1 , wherein the first layer of MOF material is composed of IRMOF-1, the second layer of MOF material is composed of HKUST-1, and wherein the plurality of sensor devices includes a third sensor device having a third layer of MOF material composed of UiO-66, a fourth sensor device having a fourth layer of MOF material composed of ZIF-8, and a fifth sensor device having a fifth layer of MOF material composed on MgMOF-74. 7. A method of optimizing an array of gas sensors each including a sensor device having a layer of MOF material disposed thereon, wherein the sensor device is structured to sense a change in mass of the MOF material, the method comprising: selecting a plurality of gas mixtures; selecting a plurality of MOF materials; selecting a plurality of array sizes, the array size being the number of gas sensors in the array; generating a set of potential arrays from the plurality of MOF materials and the plurality of array sizes, wherein each of the gas sensors in a selected potential array includes a different type of MOF material; simulating adsorption characteristics of each of the MOF materials for each of the gas mixtures; calculating an effectiveness score for each of the potential arrays; and selecting one or more of the potential arrays based on the calculated effectiveness scores. 8. The method of claim 7 , wherein calculating the effectiveness score for each of the potential arrays comprises: calculating a sensor array gas space (SAGS) score Φ for each of the potential arrays based on the following equation: ϕ W = Σ S ij W where W is a total number of combinations of pairs of gas mixtures selected from the plurality of gas mixtures and where S ij is a pairwise array score based on the following equation: S ij = m ij d ij where d ij is the Euclidean distance between two different gas mixtures, i and j, selected from the plurality of gas mixtures, each with N component gases, specified by their mole fraction, x k , based on the following equation: d ij = ∑ k = 1 N ( x k , i - x k , j ) 2 and m ij is the Euclidean distance between mass changes in an M element MOF array adsorbing either gas mixture i or gas mixture j based on the following equation: m ij =√{square root over (Σ k=1 M ( m k,i −m k,j ) 2 )} 9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising: using the SAGS score as the effectiveness score; selecting the potential array with the highest effectiveness score; and fabricating the selected potential array. 10. The method of claim 7 , wherein the plurality of gas mixtures are selected by selecting a plurality of gas components and varying each of the gas components in concentrations from 0-1 mole fractions in a predetermined step size to generate the plurality of gas mixtures, and wherein calculating the effectiveness score for each of the potential arrays comprises: selecting a subset of the plurality of gas mixtures; simulating adsorption characteristics of each of the MOF materials for each gas mixture in the subset of the plurality of gas mixtures; for each of the MOF materials and each of the subset of the plurality of gas mixtures, calculating a probability distribution of the gas mixture from the subset of the plurality of gas mixtures being selected gas mixtures from the plurality of gas mixtures; for each of the potential arrays, combining the probability distributions for each of the MOF materials in the potential array; and calculating a Kullback-Liebler divergence (KLD) for each gas mixtures in the subset of the plurality of gas mixtures for each of the potential arrays using the following equation: KLD = ∑ i N P i log
Adsorption, desorption, surface mass change, e.g. on biosensors · CPC title
Surface waves, e.g. Rayleigh waves, Love waves · CPC title
one or more transducer arrays · CPC title
Coordination polymers, e.g. metal-organic frameworks [MOF], zeolitic imidazolate frameworks [ZIF] (preparation of metal complexes containing carboxylic acid moieties C07C51/418; MOF's per se C07F) · CPC title
Fluid sensors based on microsensors, e.g. quartz crystal-microbalance [QCM], surface acoustic wave [SAW] devices, tuning forks, cantilevers, flexural plate wave [FPW] devices (microdevices per se B81B) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.