Reducing overlap through shuffle and keeping relationship balance on mapped RAID system and method

US10782894B1 · US · B1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10782894-B1
Application numberUS-201715664790-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB1
Filing dateJul 31, 2017
Priority dateJul 31, 2017
Publication dateSep 22, 2020
Grant dateSep 22, 2020

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A method, computer program product, and computer system for reducing, by a computing device, overlap in a RAID extent group by moving a first disk extent in an extent pool from a source disk to a target disk in a Mapped RAID group. A neighborhood matrix for the Mapped RAID group may be balanced by moving a second disk extent in the extent pool from the source disk to the target disk in the Mapped RAID group.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: identifying, via a computing device, overlap in a sub RAID extent group, wherein the sub RAID extent group includes at least a first RAID extent group and a second RAID extent group, wherein the overlap occurs when the first RAID extent group and the second RAID extent group both include one or more disk extents from a same disk; reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group by moving a first disk extent in an extent pool from a source disk to a target disk in a Mapped RAID group, wherein reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group results in the first RAID extent group and the second RAID extent group not sharing any disk extents in common; checking if each disk in a disk list in the extent pool has been checked; and balancing a neighborhood matrix for the Mapped RAID group by moving a second disk extent in the extent pool from the source disk to the target disk in the Mapped RAID group, wherein the neighborhood matrix indicates how many times a disk extent from a respective disk is combined with a disk extent from another disk in a RAID extent. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group includes sorting the disk list in the extent pool by free disk extent count. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising updating the neighborhood matrix after at least one of moving the first disk extent from the source disk to the target disk and moving the second disk extent from the source disk to the target disk. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group includes determining that a score for moving the first disk extent from the source disk to the target disk is valid. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 wherein the target disk results in the score for moving the first disk extent being a maximum score in the neighborhood matrix for moving the first disk extent from the source disk to the target disk. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein balancing the neighborhood matrix includes determining that a score for moving the second disk extent from the source disk to the target disk is valid. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 wherein the target disk results in the score for moving the second disk extent being a maximum score in the neighborhood matrix for moving the second disk extent from the source disk to the target disk. 8. A computer program product residing on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having a plurality of instructions stored thereon which, when executed across one or more processors, causes at least a portion of the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: identifying, via a computing device, overlap in a sub RAID extent group, wherein the sub RAID extent group includes at least a first RAID extent group and a second RAID extent group, wherein the overlap occurs when the first RAID extent group and the second RAID extent group both include one or more disk extents from a same disk; reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group by moving a first disk extent in an extent pool from a source disk to a target disk in a Mapped RAID group, wherein reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group results in the first RAID extent group and the second RAID extent group not sharing any disk extents in common; checking if each disk in a disk list in the extent pool has been checked; and balancing a neighborhood matrix for the Mapped RAID group by moving a second disk extent in the extent pool from the source disk to the target disk in the Mapped RAID group, wherein the neighborhood matrix indicates how many times a disk extent from a respective disk is combined with a disk extent from another disk in a RAID extent. 9. The computer program product of claim 8 wherein reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group includes sorting the disk list in the extent pool by free disk extent count. 10. The computer program product of claim 8 wherein the operations further comprise updating the neighborhood matrix after at least one of moving the first disk extent from the source disk to the target disk and moving the second disk extent from the source disk to the target disk. 11. The computer program product of claim 8 wherein reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group includes determining that a score for moving the first disk extent from the source disk to the target disk is valid. 12. The computer program product of claim 11 wherein the target disk results in the score for moving the first disk extent being a maximum score in the neighborhood matrix for moving the first disk extent from the source disk to the target disk. 13. The computer program product of claim 8 wherein balancing the neighborhood matrix includes determining that a score for moving the second disk extent from the source disk to the target disk is valid. 14. The computer program product of claim 13 wherein the target disk results in the score for moving the second disk extent being a maximum score in the neighborhood matrix for moving the second disk extent from the source disk to the target disk. 15. A computing system including one or more processors and one or more memories configured to perform operations comprising: identifying, via a computing device, overlap in a sub RAID extent group, wherein the sub RAID extent group includes at least a first RAID extent group and a second RAID extent group, wherein the overlap occurs when the first RAID extent group and the second RAID extent group both include one or more disk extents from a same disk; reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group by moving a first disk extent in an extent pool from a source disk to a target disk in a Mapped RAID group, wherein reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group results in the first RAID extent group and the second RAID extent group not sharing any disk extents in common; checking if each disk in a disk list in the extent pool has been checked; and balancing a neighborhood matrix for the Mapped RAID group by moving a second disk extent in the extent pool from the source disk to the target disk in the Mapped RAID group, wherein the neighborhood matrix indicates how many times a disk extent from a respective disk is combined with a disk extent from another disk in a RAID extent. 16. The computing system of claim 15 wherein reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group includes sorting the disk list in the extent pool by free disk extent count. 17. The computing system of claim 15 wherein reducing overlap in the sub RAID extent group includes determining that a score for moving the first disk extent from the source disk to the target disk is valid. 18. The computing system of claim 17 wherein the target disk results in the score for moving the first disk extent being a maximum score in the neighborhood matrix for moving the first disk extent from the source disk to the target disk. 19. The computing system of claim 15 wherein balancing the neighborhood matrix includes determining that a score for moving the second disk extent from the source disk to the target disk is valid. 20. The computing system of claim 19 wherein the target disk results in the score for moving the second disk extent being a maximum score in the neighborhood matrix for moving the second disk extent from the source disk to the target disk.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Rebuilding, e.g. when physically replacing a failing disk · CPC title

  • G06F3/0689Primary

    Disk arrays, e.g. RAID, JBOD · CPC title

  • Improving the reliability of storage systems · CPC title

  • Improving I/O performance · CPC title

  • Migration mechanisms · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10782894B1 cover?
A method, computer program product, and computer system for reducing, by a computing device, overlap in a RAID extent group by moving a first disk extent in an extent pool from a source disk to a target disk in a Mapped RAID group. A neighborhood matrix for the Mapped RAID group may be balanced by moving a second disk extent in the extent pool from the source disk to the target disk in the Mapp…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Emc Ip Holding Co Llc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F3/0689. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Sep 22 2020 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).