Method For Testing The Functional Soundness Of A Particle Sensor
US-2019323408-A1 · Oct 24, 2019 · US
US10774723B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10774723-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816020539-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 27, 2018 |
| Priority date | Jul 6, 2017 |
| Publication date | Sep 15, 2020 |
| Grant date | Sep 15, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In a method and a device for diagnosing a differential pressure sensor of a particle filter of an internal combustion engine, where the differential pressure sensor is connected via a first pressure line to an exhaust-gas system upstream from the particle filter and via a second pressure line to the exhaust-gas system downstream from the particle filter and upstream from a rear muffler, a diagnosis of the first or second pressure lines is performed by evaluating a comparison of a differential pressure signal from a differential pressure sensor with modeled pressure values.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for diagnosing connections, to an exhaust-gas system, of a differential-pressure sensor of a particle filter of an internal combustion system, the differential-pressure sensor being connected (a) via a first pressure line to the exhaust-gas system upstream from the particle filter, and (b) via a second pressure line to the exhaust-gas system downstream from the particle filter and upstream from at least one rear muffler, comprising the following steps: ascertaining a measured pressure drop over the particle filter from a differential pressure signal from the differential-pressure sensor; forming a first cross-correlation of the measured pressure drop and a modeled pressure drop over the particle filter, the modeled pressure drop over the particle filter being ascertained using a first stored characteristics map; comparing the first cross-correlation to a modeled pressure drop over the rear muffler, the modeled pressure drop over the rear muffler being ascertained using a second stored characteristics map; and determining a fault of the first or second pressure line based on the comparing. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the following step: forming a second cross-correlation of the measured pressure drop, the modeled pressure drop over the particle filter, and the modeled pressure drop over the rear muffler; wherein the comparison includes comparing the second cross-correlation to the first cross-correlation, and wherein the determining of the fault of the first or second pressure line includes determining a fault of the second pressure line in response to a standard deviation of the first cross-correlation exceeding a standard deviation of the second cross-correlation. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the determining of the fault of the first or second pressure line includes evaluating a magnitude of the first and second cross-correlations, evaluating an abrupt change in the magnitude of the first and the second cross-correlations in a direction of an increase, and determining, based on the abrupt change, the fault of the second pressure line. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the following step: forming a second cross-correlation of the measured pressure drop over the particle filter and the modeled pressure drop over the rear muffler; wherein the comparison includes comparing the second cross-correlation to the first cross-correlation, and wherein the determining of the fault of the first or second pressure line includes determining a fault of the first pressure line responsive to a standard deviation of the first cross-correlation exceeding a standard deviation of the second cross-correlation. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the determining of the fault of the first or second pressure line includes evaluating an algebraic sign of the first or second cross-correlations, and determining the fault of the first pressure line responsive to a change in the evaluated algebraic sign. 6. A device for diagnosing connections, to an exhaust-gas system, of a differential pressure sensor of a particle filter of an internal combustion engine, the differential pressure sensor being connected (a) via a first pressure line to the exhaust-gas system upstream from the particle filter, and (b) via a second pressure line to an exhaust-gas system downstream from the particle filter and upstream from a rear muffler, the device comprising: a processor, wherein the processor is configured to: obtain a differential pressure signal from a pressure sensor; ascertain a measured pressure drop over the particle filter from the obtained differential pressure signal; form a first cross-correlation of the measured pressure drop and a modeled pressure drop over the particle filter, the modeled pressure drop over the particle filter being ascertained using a first stored characteristics map; compare the first correlation to a modeled pressure drop over the rear muffler, the modeled pressure drop over the rear muffler being ascertained using a second stored characteristics map; and determine a fault of the first or second pressure line based on the comparing. 7. The device of claim 6 , wherein the processor is further configured to: form a second cross-correlation of the measured pressure drop, the modeled pressure drop over the particle filter, and the modeled pressure drop over the rear muffler; wherein the comparison includes comparing the second cross-correlation to the first cross-correlation, and wherein the determination of the fault of the first or second pressure line includes determining a fault of the second pressure line in response to a standard deviation of the first cross-correlation exceeding a standard deviation of the second cross-correlation. 8. The device of claim 7 , wherein the determination of the fault of the first or second pressure line includes the processor evaluating a magnitude of the first and second cross-correlations, evaluating an abrupt change in the magnitude of the first and the second cross-correlations in a direction of an increase, and determining, based on the abrupt change, the fault of the second pressure line. 9. The device of claim 6 , wherein the processor is further configured to: form a second cross-correlation of the measured pressure drop over the particle filter and the modeled pressure drop over the rear muffler; wherein the comparison includes the processor comparing the second cross-correlation to the first cross-correlation, and wherein the determination of the fault of the first or second pressure line includes determining a fault of the first pressure line responsive to a standard deviation of the first cross-correlation exceeding a standard deviation of the second cross-correlation. 10. The device of claim 9 , wherein the determination of the fault of the first or second pressure line includes the processor evaluating an algebraic sign of the first or second cross-correlations, and determining the fault of the first pressure line responsive to a change in the evaluated algebraic sign.
Engine management systems · CPC title
the means being a pressure sensor · CPC title
Filtering activity of particulate filters · CPC title
using integration or an accumulated value within an elapsed period · CPC title
Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.