Optimised energy efficiency hydrothermal carbonization method and device
US-10538447-B2 · Jan 21, 2020 · US
US10689282B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10689282-B2 |
| Application number | US-201616345811-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 27, 2016 |
| Priority date | Oct 27, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jun 23, 2020 |
| Grant date | Jun 23, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
This disclosure provides a process based on hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) treatment for co-processing of high-water-content wastewater sludge and other lignocellulosic biomass for co-production of biogas and bio-crude oil. The mixture of waste activated sludge and lignocellulosic biomass such as birchwood sawdust/cornstalk/MSW was converted under HTL conditions in presence of KOH as the homogeneous catalyst. The operating conditions including reaction temperature, reaction time and solids concentration were optimized based on the response surface methodology for the maximum bio-crude oil production. The highest bio-crude oil yield of around 34 wt % was obtained by co-feeding waste activated sludge with lignocellulosic biomass at an optimum temperature of 310° C., reaction time of 10 min, and solids concentration of 10 wt %. The two by-products from this process (bio-char and water-soluble products) can be used to produce energy as well. Water-soluble products were used to produce biogas through Bio-methane Potential Test (BMP) and were found to produce around 800 mL bio-methane cumulatively in 30 days per 0.816 g of total organic carbon (TOC) or 2.09 g of chemical oxygen demand (COD) of water-soluble products.
Opening claim text (preview).
Therefore what is claimed is: 1. A process of coproduction of biogas and bio-crude oil, comprising: a) mixing wastewater sludge with waste lignocellulosic biomass to form a mixture with an overall solid content in a range from about 5 to about 25 wt %; b) subjecting the mixture to hydrothermal liquefaction in a reactor at held at a temperature in a range from about 200 to about 350° C. under pressure in a range from about 50 to about 150 bars and in the presence of a catalyst to give a reaction product; c) removing and collecting solid bio-char from the reaction product in the reactor, removing and collecting bio-oil from the reaction product in the reactor, and removing and collecting aqueous products from the reaction product in the reactor; and d) anaerobically digesting the aqueous products to produce and collecting biogas produced from the anaerobically digested aqueous products. 2. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the mixture of wastewater sludge and waste biomass has a solid content in a range from about 8 to about 20 wt %. 3. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the solid content of the mixture of wastewater sludge and waste biomass is about 10 wt %. 4. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the temperature is maintained in a range from about 280 to about 330° C. 5. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the pressure is maintained in a range from about 100 to about 150 bars. 6. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the catalyst is any one or combination of KOH, K 2 CO 3 , NaOH, Na 2 CO 3 , Colemanite, FeSO 4 , Ca(OH) 2 , hydrotalcite (HT), and MgO. 7. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the catalyst is any one or combination of KOH, K 2 CO 3 , NaOH and Na 2 CO 3 . 8. The process according to claim 1 performed in a continuous reactor system. 9. The process according to claim 1 performed in a batch reactor system. 10. The process according to claim 2 , wherein the temperature is maintained in a range from about 280 to about 330° C. 11. The process according to claim 2 , wherein the pressure is maintained in a range from about 100 to about 150 bars. 12. The process according to claim 2 , wherein the catalyst is any one or combination of KOH, K 2 CO 3 , NaOH, Na 2 CO 3 , Colemanite, FeSO 4 , Ca(OH) 2 , hydrotalcite (HT), and MgO. 13. The process according to claim 2 , performed in a continuous reactor system. 14. The process according to claim 2 , performed in a batch reactor system. 15. The process according to claim 3 , wherein the temperature is maintained in a range from about 280 to about 330° C. 16. The process according to claim 3 , wherein the pressure is maintained in a range from about 100 to about 150 bars. 17. The process according to claim 3 , wherein the catalyst is any one or combination of KOH, K 2 CO 3 , NaOH, Na 2 CO 3 , Colemanite, FeSO 4 , Ca(OH) 2 , hydrotalcite (HT), and MgO. 18. The process according to claim 3 , performed in a continuous reactor system. 19. The process according to claim 3 , performed in a batch reactor system. 20. The process according to claim 4 , wherein the pressure is maintained in a range from about 100 to about 150 bars.
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.