Broken Rail Detection System for Communications-Based Train Control
US-2016107664-A1 · Apr 21, 2016 · US
US10689016B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10689016-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715717207-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 27, 2017 |
| Priority date | Nov 21, 2012 |
| Publication date | Jun 23, 2020 |
| Grant date | Jun 23, 2020 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system includes a route examining system on a non-propulsion-generating vehicle at a trailing end of a leading vehicle system. The route examining system examines a route on which the leading vehicle system is moving to determine whether the route is damaged. The system also includes an off-board failsafe controller that communicates with the route examining system. The off-board failsafe controller sends a warning signal to the trailing vehicle system responsive to receiving a notification signal from the route examining system indicating detection of damage to the route. The off-board failsafe controller also sends the warning signal to the trailing vehicle system responsive to losing communication with the route examining system. The warning signal directs the trailing vehicle system to automatically change movement of the trailing vehicle system responsive to the detection of damage to the route and/or the off-board failsafe controller losing communication with the route examining system.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system comprising: a route examining system configured to be disposed on a leading vehicle system and configured to examine a route on which the leading vehicle system is moving by injecting an examination signal into the route at a first location and monitoring electrical characteristics of the route at a second location to determine whether the route is damaged, the route examining system configured to generate an inspection signal based on the examination of the route, the inspection signal indicating a status of a route segment as damaged based on an absence of the examination signal at the second location or not damaged based on a presence of the examination signal at the second location, wherein the inspection signal is not injected into the route; and an off-board failsafe controller configured to communicate with the route examining system, the off-board failsafe controller configured to receive the inspection signal from the route examining system, wherein the off-board failsafe controller is configured to send a warning signal to a trailing vehicle system on the route responsive to the inspection signal indicating the status of the route segment as damaged, wherein the off-board failsafe controller also is configured to send the warning signal to the trailing vehicle system responsive to a lack of receipt of the inspection signal from the route examining system within a designated time period, the lack of receipt of the inspection signal indicating communication loss with the route examining system, and wherein the warning signal directs the trailing vehicle system to automatically change movement of the trailing vehicle system to (i) avoid traveling over the route segment or (ii) travel over the route segment at a reduced speed relative to the trailing vehicle system not receiving the warning signal from the off-board failsafe controller. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the route examining system is disposed on a non-propulsion-generating vehicle at a trailing end of the leading vehicle system, the leading vehicle system formed from at least the non-propulsion-generating vehicle and one or more propulsion-generating vehicles. 3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the route examining system is configured to be disposed onboard the non-propulsion-generating vehicle that is dedicated to inspecting the route without carrying other cargo of the leading vehicle system. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the route examining system is configured to be disposed onboard the leading vehicle system that travels ahead of the trailing vehicle system on the route and that is separate from the trailing vehicle system. 5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the route examining system also is configured to communicate a signal indicative of an absence of damage to the route to the off-board failsafe controller so that the off-board failsafe controller communicates an approval signal to the trailing vehicle system to notify the trailing vehicle system of the absence of detected damage to the route. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the route examining system is configured to control the movement of the trailing vehicle system by directing the trailing vehicle system to automatically slow movement, stop movement, or change which route the trailing vehicle system is traveling on. 7. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a power source configured to be onboard the leading vehicle system and configured to power the route examining system with electric energy. 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the route examining system includes first and second conductive bodies that engage the route, the first conductive body configured to inject an electric current into the route, the second conductive body configured to receive the electric current after being conducted through at least a portion of the route. 9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the route examining system is configured to be disposed onboard an ore cart. 10. The system of claim 1 , wherein, responsive to the lack of receipt of the inspection signal from the route examining system within the designated time period, the off-board failsafe controller is configured to determine that a segment of the route is damaged starting at a location where the route examining system sent a last inspection signal that was successfully received by the off-board failsafe controller, the last inspection signal indicating the status of the route as not damaged, wherein the warning signal sent to the trailing vehicle system identifies the segment of the route. 11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the route examining system is configured to be disposed onboard the leading vehicle system that is formed from one or more vehicles other than rail vehicles. 12. A system comprising: an off-board failsafe controller including a communication unit; and a route examining system configured to be disposed on a leading vehicle system and configured to examine a route segment on which the leading vehicle system is moving by injecting an examination signal into the route segment at a first location and monitoring electrical characteristics of the route segment at a second location to determine whether the route segment is damaged, the route examining system configured to generate inspection signals based on the examination of the route segment and periodically communicate the inspection signals to the off-board failsafe controller during travel of the leading vehicle system along the route segment, wherein the inspection signal is not injected into the route segment, each inspection signal indicating a status of the route segment as damaged based on an absence of the examination signal at the second location or not damaged based on a presence of the examination signal at the second location; wherein the communication unit of the off-board failsafe controller is configured to receive the inspection signals from the route examining system, wherein the off-board failsafe controller is configured to generate and send, via the communication unit, a warning signal to a trailing vehicle system on the route responsive to at least one of the received inspection signals indicating the status of the route segment as damaged, wherein the off-board failsafe controller is configured to generate and send, via the communication unit, the warning signal to the trailing vehicle system responsive to the communication unit failing to receive any of the inspection signals from the route examining system within a designated time period indicating communication loss with the route examining system, and wherein the warning signal directs the trailing vehicle system to automatically change movement of the trailing vehicle system to (i) avoid traveling over the route segment or (ii) travel over the route segment at a reduced speed relative to the trailing vehicle system not receiving the warning signal from the off-board failsafe controller.
Handling position reports or trackside vehicle data · CPC title
Trackside control of safe travel of vehicle or train, e.g. braking curve calculation · CPC title
Radio-based, e.g. using GSM-R · CPC title
Absolute localisation, e.g. providing geodetic coordinates · CPC title
using current passing between devices along the route and devices on the vehicle or train · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.