Automatic compilation method and framework for generating a layout of integrated memory-compute circuit
US-2024403527-A1 · Dec 5, 2024 · US
US10311186B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10311186-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615096551-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 12, 2016 |
| Priority date | Apr 12, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jun 4, 2019 |
| Grant date | Jun 4, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methodologies and a device for assessing integrated circuit and pattern for yield risk based on 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns are provided. Embodiments include generating, with a processor, a 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns; obtaining critical dimensions of distances between layers or within a layer of the 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns; comparing the set of critical dimensions with predefined minimum dimensions; and yield scoring each of the semiconductor patterns of the 3D simulation based on the comparing step.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: generating, with a processor, a three dimensional (3D) simulation of semiconductor patterns; obtaining a set of critical dimensions of distances between layers or within a layer of the 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns; comparing the set of critical dimensions with predefined minimum dimensions; yield scoring, with non-linear models, each of the semiconductor patterns of the 3D simulation based on the comparing step; generating an integrated circuit (IC) model based on the yield scoring each of the semiconductor patterns of the 3D simulation, the IC yield model including optimized parameters from design and process improvements, wherein the 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns represents an actual process outcome on a wafer. 2. The method according to claim 1 , comprising: normalizing an overall yield score to a volume of the 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns and translating into a risk factor. 3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the risk factor is a direct measure of a yield probability of the IC model. 4. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: creating a two dimensional (2D) pattern risk assessment derived from the IC model for yield forecasting. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: identifying an at risk pattern prior to processing the IC model. 6. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising: substituting the at risk pattern with an acceptable pattern, wherein the acceptable pattern has a lower risk factor than the at risk pattern. 7. The method according to claim 1 , comprising: obtaining critical dimensions by obtaining a distance between adjacent conductors. 8. The method according to claim 1 , comprising: obtaining critical dimensions by obtaining a distance between a tapered via and an adjacent metal line corner, wherein a minimum distance vector is angled in 3D space. 9. A device comprising: a three dimensional (3D) simulator that generates a 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns; a processor configured to: obtain a set of critical dimensions of distances between layers or within a layer of the 3D model of semiconductor patterns; compare the set of critical dimensions with predefined minimum dimensions; and yield score, with non-linear models, each of the semiconductor patterns of the 3D simulation based on the comparing step, wherein the 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns represents an actual process outcome on a wafer, yield score each of the semiconductor patterns of the 3D simulation to generate an integrated circuit (IC) model, and wherein the IC yield model includes optimized parameters from design and process improvements. 10. The device according to claim 9 , wherein an overall yield score is normalized to a volume of the 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns and translated into a risk factor. 11. The device according to claim 10 , wherein the risk factor is a direct measure of a yield probability of the IC model. 12. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the processor is further configured to: create a two dimensional (2D) pattern risk assessment derived from the IC model for yield forecasting. 13. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the processor is further configured to: identify an at risk pattern prior to processing the IC model; and substitute the at risk pattern with an acceptable pattern, wherein the acceptable pattern has a lower risk factor than the at risk pattern. 14. A method comprising: generating, with a processor, a three dimensional (3D) simulation of semiconductor patterns representing an actual process outcome on a wafer; obtaining a set of critical dimensions of distances between layers or within a layer of the 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns; comparing the set of critical dimensions with predefined minimum dimensions; yield scoring each of the semiconductor patterns of the 3D simulation based on the comparing step to generate an integrated circuit (IC) model; normalizing an overall yield score to a volume of the 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns and translating it into a risk factor; identifying an at risk pattern prior to processing the IC model; and substituting the at risk pattern with an acceptable pattern, wherein the acceptable pattern has a lower risk factor than the at risk pattern, wherein the risk factor is a direct measure of a yield probability of the IC model, and wherein the 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns represents the actual process outcome on the wafer.
Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability · CPC title
Design verification, e.g. using simulation, simulation program with integrated circuit emphasis [SPICE], direct methods or relaxation methods · CPC title
Design verification or optimisation, e.g. using design rule check [DRC], layout versus schematics [LVS] or finite element methods [FEM] (optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes G03F1/36) · CPC title
Cross-Sectional Technologies · mapped topic
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.