Defect detection and classification based on attributes determined from a standard reference image
US-2015221076-A1 · Aug 6, 2015 · US
US10290092B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10290092-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414279192-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 15, 2014 |
| Priority date | May 15, 2014 |
| Publication date | May 14, 2019 |
| Grant date | May 14, 2019 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system configured to detect defects in an inspection image generated by collecting signals arriving from an article, the system comprising a tangible processor which includes: (i) a distribution acquisition module, configured to acquire a distribution of comparison values, each of the comparison values being indicative of a relationship between a value associated with a pixel of the inspection image and a corresponding reference value; (ii) a fitting module, configured to fit to the distribution an approximation function out of a predefined group of functions; and (iii) a defect detection module, configured to: (a) set a defect detection criterion based on a result of the fitting; and to (b) determine a presence of a defect in the inspection image, based on the defect detection criterion.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for computerized defect detection in an inspection image generated by collecting signals arriving from an article, the method comprising: acquiring a distribution of comparison values, each of the comparison values being indicative of a relationship between a value associated with a pixel of the inspection image and a corresponding reference value; selecting a family of functions, from a plurality of families of functions, based on a noise characteristic of an inspection of the article and a type of defect to be detected; selecting an approximation function from the selected family of functions; fitting, to the distribution, the approximation function that is selected from the family of functions; setting a defect detection criterion based on a result of the fitting; and determining, by a processing device, a presence of a defect in the inspection image based on the defect detection criterion. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the approximation function is a Parabola and the fitting includes selecting one or more Parabola parameters. 3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the fitting includes selecting the approximation function by estimating errors between the distribution of comparison values and the approximation function. 4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein each of the comparison values is indicative of a difference between a color value of a pixel of the inspection image and a color value of a corresponding pixel of a reference image. 5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the fitting gives smaller weight to common comparison values. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the acquiring comprises applying an operator to values of the distribution, wherein for at least half of the values of the distribution, a difference between an output value of the operator and a maximum function is less than 10% of a maximum value of the distribution, wherein the maximum function is based on another output value of a logarithmic function and a constant value. 7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the fitting gives smaller weight to comparison values whose distance from an average comparison value is larger than a standard deviation of the distribution. 8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the fitting gives smaller weight to: (a) common comparison values, and to (b) comparison values whose distance from an average comparison value is larger than a standard deviation of the distribution. 9. A system configured to detect defects in an inspection image generated by collecting signals arriving from an article, the system comprising: a memory; and a processor, operatively coupled with the memory, to: acquire a distribution of comparison values, each of the comparison values being indicative of a relationship between a value associated with a pixel of the inspection image and a corresponding reference value; select a family of functions, from a plurality of families of functions, based on a noise characteristic of an inspection of the article and a type of defect to be detected; select an approximation function from the selected family of functions; fit, to the distribution, the approximation function that is selected from the family of functions; set a defect detection criterion based on a result of the fitting; and determine a presence of a defect in the inspection image based on the defect detection criterion. 10. The system according to claim 9 , wherein the approximation function is a Parabola and the fitting includes selecting one or more Parabola parameters. 11. The system according to claim 9 , wherein the processor is further to select the approximation function by estimating errors between the distribution of comparison values and the approximation function. 12. The system according to claim 9 , wherein each of the comparison values is indicative of a difference between a color value of a pixel of the inspection image and a color value of a corresponding pixel of a reference image. 13. The system according to claim 9 , wherein the processor is further to give smaller weight to common comparison values when fitting the approximation function to the distribution. 14. The system according to claim 9 , wherein the processor is further to apply an operator to values of the distribution, wherein for at least half of the values of the distribution, a difference between an output value of the operator and a maximum function is less than 10% of a maximum value of the distribution, wherein the maximum function is based on another output value of a logarithmic function and a constant value. 15. The system according to claim 9 , wherein the processor is further to give smaller weight to comparison values whose distance from an average comparison value is larger than a standard deviation of the distribution when fitting the approximation function to the distribution. 16. The system according to claim 9 , wherein the processor is further to give smaller weight to: (a) common comparison values, and to (b) comparison values whose distance from an average comparison value is larger than a standard deviation of the distribution, when fitting the approximation function to the distribution. 17. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium having instructions that, when executed by a processing device, cause the processing device to perform operations for defect detection in an inspection image generated by collecting signals arriving from an article, the operations comprising: acquiring a distribution of comparison values, each of the comparison values being indicative of a relationship between a value associated with a pixel of the inspection image and a corresponding reference value; selecting a family of functions, from a plurality of families of functions, based on a noise characteristic of an inspection of the article and a type of defect to be detected; selecting an approximation function from the selected family of functions; fitting, to the distribution, the approximation function that is selected from the family of functions; setting a defect detection criterion based on a result of the fitting; and determining a presence of a defect in the inspection image based on the defect detection criterion. 18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 17 , wherein the approximation function is a Parabola and the fitting includes selecting one or more Parabola parameters. 19. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 17 , wherein the fitting includes selecting the approximation function by estimating errors between the distribution of comparison values and the approximation function. 20. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 17 , wherein the fitting gives smaller weight to common comparison values. 21. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 17 , wherein the acquiring comprises applying an operator to values of the distribution, wherein for at least half of the values of the distribution, a difference between an output value of the operator and a maximum function is less than 10% of a maximum value of the distribution, wherein the maximum function is based on another output value of a logarithmic function and a constant value. 22. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium according to claim 17 , wherein the fitting gives smaller weight to comparison values whose distance fr
Probabilistic image processing · CPC title
Semiconductor; IC; Wafer · CPC title
checking presence/absence · CPC title
Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection · CPC title
using a design-rule based approach · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.