Non-model predictive control to model predictive control transitions
US-2015275786-A1 · Oct 1, 2015 · US
US10119481B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10119481-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715465647-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 22, 2017 |
| Priority date | Mar 22, 2017 |
| Publication date | Nov 6, 2018 |
| Grant date | Nov 6, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A propulsion system, control system, and method are provided for optimizing fuel economy, which use model predictive control systems to generate a plurality of sets of possible command values and determine a cost for each set of possible command values of based on a first predetermined weighting value, a second predetermined weighting value, a plurality of predicted values, and a plurality of requested values. The set of possible command values having the lowest cost is determined and defined as a set of selected command values. Arbitration is performed including at least one of the following: A) determining at least one requested value based on arbitrating between a driver requested value and an intervention requested value; and B) determining a desired command value by arbitrating between a selected command value of the set of selected command values and a command intervention value.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for controlling a propulsion system of a motor vehicle, the method comprising: generating a plurality of sets of possible command values; determining a cost for each set of possible command values of the plurality of sets of possible command values based on a first predetermined weighting value, a second predetermined weighting value, a plurality of predicted values, and a plurality of requested values; determining which set of possible command values of the plurality of sets of possible command values has a lowest cost; and selecting the set of possible command values that has the lowest cost to define a set of selected command values; performing an arbitration step comprising at least one of the following arbitration procedures A and B: A) determining at least one requested value of the plurality of requested values based on arbitrating between a driver requested value and an intervention requested value; and B) determining a desired command value by arbitrating between a selected command value of the set of selected command values and a command intervention value; and controlling a vehicle parameter based on the desired command value. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein performing the arbitration step comprises performing both of the arbitrations procedures A and B. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein: the plurality of sets of possible command values includes a plurality of commanded engine output torque values; the set of selected command values includes a selected engine output torque value; and the command intervention value includes an engine torque intervention value. 4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising: generating a plurality of predicted actual axle torque values and a plurality of predicted actual fuel consumption rate values based on the plurality of sets of possible command values, the plurality of sets of possible command values including a plurality of possible commanded transmission ratio values; and determining the cost for each set of possible command values further based on a predicted actual axle torque value of the plurality of predicted axle torque values and a predicted actual fuel consumption rate value of the plurality of predicted actual fuel consumption rate values, the plurality of requested values including a driver axle torque requested, an engine output torque requested, a transmission ratio requested, and a fuel consumption rate requested. 5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising determining the plurality of predicted actual axle torque values and the plurality of predicted actual fuel consumption rate values with the following set of equations: x k + 1 = { A * x k + B * [ Te_c _arb Rat_c k ] + v } + K KF * ( [ Te_m k FR_m k Rat_m k Ta_m k ] - [ Te_a k FR_a k Rat_a k Ta_a k ] ) [ Ta_a k + 1
using a predictive controller · CPC title
by applying a torque limit · CPC title
characterised by the function converting demand to actuation, e.g. a map indicating relations between an accelerator pedal position and throttle valve opening or target engine torque · CPC title
for smoothing gear shifts · CPC title
Estimation of the output torque · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.