Method, system and device for error detection in OFDM wireless communication networks without full forward error correction decoding

US10003435B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-10003435-B2
Application numberUS-201615361160-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateNov 25, 2016
Priority dateNov 25, 2015
Publication dateJun 19, 2018
Grant dateJun 19, 2018

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A system, method and device for error detection/estimation in OFDM communications systems is proposed. The disclosed mechanism allows an efficient error prediction in a received packet, without having to perform full FEC decoding of the packet that could impair the overall latency of the system due to the time spent in a complete FEC decoding of the packet. In order to do that, it generates a decision variable with the aim to check whether a received packet has errors or not, after performing only partial FEC decoding of the packet, without either resorting to the use of error-detection codes.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A method for detecting errors in an information packet ( 13 ) received by an OFDM receiver ( 14 ) in an Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing, OFDM, system, where the information packet is encoded using a Forward Error Correction, FEC, technique, said FEC technique involves at the receiver an iterative decoding process, the method characterized by comprising the following steps performed at the receiver ( 14 ): a) performing a number of iterations, N iter , of the Forward Error Correction decoding technique on the received packet of length N FEC bits, where N iter is lower than the minimum number of iterations required for full FEC decoding at the intended signal to noise and interference ratio, SINR; b) obtaining a posteriori log-likelihood ratio, LLR, value for each decoded bit after N iter FEC decoding iterations; c) obtaining the block error probability for the block of decoded bits after N iter iterations, BLEP 0 Niter , and the probability density function of said block error probability, from said a posteriori LLR values; d) estimating a block error rate that would correspond to the received packet under full FEC decoding, based on post-detection Signal to Interference and Noise Ratios, SINR, of the received bits; e) obtaining a decision variable value for block error decisions, Z, as a function of the obtained block error probability BLEP 0 Niter and the probability density function of said block error probability; and f) determining whether the received packet has errors or not, by comparing said decision variable with a first threshold. 2. A method according to claim 1 , where the LLR values for the decoded bits after N iter FEC decoding iterations are defined as: L ⁢ ⁢ L ⁢ ⁢ R n Niter ≡ ln ⁢ p ⁡ ( x n = + 1 ❘ y ) p ⁡ ( x n = - 1 ❘ y ) , n = 0 , … ⁢ , N - 1 , where LLR n Niter denotes the a-posteriori log-likelihood ratio of the received n-th bit after N iter iterations, y denotes the decoded signal after N iter iterations, x n is the corresponding n-th transmitted bit, and N is defined by the expression N=r·N FEC , where r is the FEC encoding rate. 3. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the block error probability after N iter iterations, BLEP 0 Niter , is obtained by the expression: B ⁢ ⁢ L ⁢ ⁢ E ⁢ ⁢ P 0 Niter = 1 - ∏ n = 0 N - 1 ⁢ ⁢ ( 1 1 + e -  L ⁢ ⁢ L ⁢ ⁢ R n Niter  ) , where LLR n Niter is the log-likelihood ratio of the received n-th bit after N iter iterations, and N is defined by the expression N=r·N FEC , where r is the FEC encoding rate. 4. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the probability density function of said block error probability after N iter iterations, BLEP Niter , is calculated as a function of the probability density function of the LLR values, LLR n Niter , by using the following transformation: ln ⁡ ( 1 - B ⁢

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Parsing or analysis of headers · CPC title

  • Turbo codes and decoding · CPC title

  • Frame classification, e.g. bad, good or erased (frame indication per se H04L1/0082) · CPC title

  • Iterative decoding, including iteration between signal detection and decoding operation · CPC title

  • with judging correct decoding · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US10003435B2 cover?
A system, method and device for error detection/estimation in OFDM communications systems is proposed. The disclosed mechanism allows an efficient error prediction in a received packet, without having to perform full FEC decoding of the packet that could impair the overall latency of the system due to the time spent in a complete FEC decoding of the packet. In order to do that, it generates a d…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Telefonica Sa
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification H03M13/2948. Mapped technology areas include Electricity.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jun 19 2018 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).