Generating secured recommendations for business intelligence enterprise systems

US9977815B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9977815-B2
Application numberUS-201414579786-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateDec 22, 2014
Priority dateDec 22, 2014
Publication dateMay 22, 2018
Grant dateMay 22, 2018

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

In one embodiment a computer-implemented method for recommending documents to a user, the method comprises determining, by a computer, audit logs entries that are associated with members of a group that includes the user as a member, each audit log entry is associated with a file that a member of the group has accessed; analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries; and generating, by the computer, a recommendation of at least one file for the user based on the analyzing of the associated audit log entries.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for recommending documents to a user, the method comprising: determining, by a computer, audit logs entries that are associated with members of a group that includes the user as a member, each audit log entry is associated with a file stored in a database that a member of the group has accessed during a create event, during a view event, or during a search event, the database further comprising a recommendation table including a timestamp field, an event field, and a rank field; analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries; analyzing, by the computer, a scheduled time of refreshing of data from the database, the analyzing comprising referencing a value of the event field of the recommendation table, the file comprising a report previously accessed by the members of the group; and generating, by the computer, a recommendation of the file for the user in an order according to a rank based on the analyzing of the associated audit log entries, a count of the value, and the scheduled time updating the timestamp field, wherein the value of the search event is greater than the value of the view event, and the value of the view event is greater than the value of the create event, and wherein the timestamp field is used to determine preference in rank between recommendations having a same count after consideration of the view event. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the audit log entries include search information of the members of the group. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein generating, by the computer, the recommendation further includes generating the recommendation to the user of the group based on search information of other members of the group. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries further includes determining files having a highest number of views by members of the group. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries further includes determining times that files are viewed by members of the group, wherein generating, by the computer, the recommendation includes generating the recommendation based on a number of times that files are viewed by members of the group. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries includes determining times that files are used by the user, wherein generating, by the computer, the recommendation further includes generating the recommendation based on a number of times that files are used by the user. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries includes determining a date of creation of files by members of the group, wherein generating, by the computer, the recommendation further includes generating the recommendation based on the date of creation by members of the group. 8. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium embodying a computer program for performing a method, the method comprising: determining, by a computer, audit logs entries that are associated with members of a group that includes the user as a member, each audit log entry is associated with a file stored in a database that a member of the group has accessed during a create event, during a view event, or during a search event, the database further comprising a recommendation table including a timestamp field, an event field, and a rank field; analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries; analyzing, by the computer, a scheduled time of refreshing of data from the database, the analyzing comprising referencing a value of the event field of the recommendation table, the file comprising a report previously accessed by the members of the group; and generating, by the computer, a recommendation of the file for the user in an order according to rank based on the analyzing of the associated audit log entries, a count of the value, and the scheduled time updating the timestamp field, wherein the value of the search event is greater than the value of the view event, and the value of the view event is greater than the value of the create event, and wherein the timestamp field is used to determine a preference in rank between recommendations having a same count after consideration of the view event. 9. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8 wherein the audit log entries include search information of the members of the group. 10. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 9 wherein generating, by the computer, the recommendation further includes generating the recommendation to the user of the group based on search information of other members of the group. 11. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8 wherein analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries includes determining files having a highest number of views by members of the group. 12. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8 wherein analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries includes determining times that files are viewed by members of the group, wherein generating, by the computer, the recommendation further includes generating the recommendation based on a number of times that files are viewed by members of the group. 13. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8 wherein analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries includes determining times that files are used by the user, wherein generating, by the computer, the recommendation further includes generating the recommendation based on a number of times that files are used by the user. 14. A computer system comprising: one or more processors; a software program, executable on the computer system, the software program configured to: determine audit logs entries that are associated with members of a group that includes the user as a member, each audit log entry is associated with a file stored in a database that a member of the group has accessed during a create event, during a view event, or during a search event, the database further comprising a recommendation table including a timestamp field, an event field, and a rank field; analyze the associated audit log entries; analyze a scheduled time of refreshing of data from the database, the file comprising a report previously accessed by the members of the group the analyzing comprising referencing a value of the event field of the recommendation table; and generate a recommendation of the file for the user in an order according to a rank based on the analyzing of the associated audit log entries, a count of the value, and the scheduled time updating the timestamp field, wherein the value of the search event is greater than the value of the view event, and the value of the view event is greater than the value of the create event, and wherein the timestamp field is used to determine a preference in rank between recommendations having a same count after consideration of the view event. 15. The computer system of claim 14 wherein the audit log entries include search information of the members of the group. 16. The computer system of claim 15 wherein the software program is further configured to generate the recommendation to the user of the group based on search information of other members of the group. 17. The computer system of claim 14 wher

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Physics · mapped topic

  • Administration; Management · CPC title

  • Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals · CPC title

  • G06F16/24Primary

    Querying · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9977815B2 cover?
In one embodiment a computer-implemented method for recommending documents to a user, the method comprises determining, by a computer, audit logs entries that are associated with members of a group that includes the user as a member, each audit log entry is associated with a file that a member of the group has accessed; analyzing, by the computer, the associated audit log entries; and generatin…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Chandran Lakshmy, S Praveen, Kunal Parsewar, and 2 more
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F17/30386. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue May 22 2018 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 6 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).