Multi level multileaf collimator leaf tip shape effects and penumbra optimization
US-2015273239-A1 · Oct 1, 2015 · US
US9966160B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9966160-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615359503-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 22, 2016 |
| Priority date | Nov 24, 2015 |
| Publication date | May 8, 2018 |
| Grant date | May 8, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A collimating system for collimating a radiation beam having a first multileaf collimator and a second multileaf collimator configured such that the radiation beam will pass through the first multileaf collimator before passing through the second multileaf collimator, and pass through the second multileaf collimator before hitting its target. The leaves of the first multileaf collimator and the leaves of the second multileaf collimator may be configured to move independently of one another.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A collimating system for collimating a radiation beam from a radiation source, the beam being directed at a target, comprising: a first multileaf collimator having a plurality of leaves; a second multileaf collimator having a plurality of leaves and configured such that the radiation beam will pass through the first multileaf collimator before passing through the second multileaf collimator, and pass through the second multileaf collimator before hitting the target; wherein the leaves of the first multileaf collimator and the leaves of the second multileaf collimator are configured to move independently of one another; and wherein at least one of the first multileaf collimator and the second multileaf collimator is double focused. 2. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the first multileaf collimator and the second multileaf collimator are both double focused. 3. The collimating system of claim 2 wherein the first multileaf collimator and the second multileaf collimator are configured to be slightly defocused to decrease radiation leakage through interleaf gaps. 4. The collimating system of claim 3 wherein the first multileaf collimator and the second multileaf collimator are configured to be defocused by approximately 1 centimeter. 5. The collimating system of claim 2 wherein the first multileaf collimator has a focus point and the second multileaf collimator has a focus point and the focus point of the first multileaf collimator is different from the focus point of the second multileaf collimator. 6. The collimating system of claim 5 wherein the differing focus points of the first multileaf collimator and the second multileaf collimator improve the match of penumbra between the first multileaf collimator and the second multileaf collimator. 7. The collimating system of claim 5 wherein the focus point of the first multileaf collimator is at the effective source point and the focus point of the second multileaf collimator is moved off of the effective source point. 8. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the first multileaf collimator and second multileaf collimator are further configured to collimate a beam thinner than the widths of the leaves of the first and second multileaf collimators. 9. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the leaves of the first multileaf collimator have approximately the same width as the leaves of the second multileaf collimator. 10. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the leaves of the first multileaf collimator are immediately adjacent to one another and the leaves of the second multileaf collimator are immediately adjacent to one another. 11. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein gaps between adjacent leaves in the first multileaf collimator and gaps between adjacent leaves in the second multileaf collimator are minimized to reduce radiation leakage. 12. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the leaves of both the first multileaf collimator and the second multileaf collimator are approximately 4 mm wide. 13. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the leaves of the first multileaf collimator and the leaves of the second multileaf collimator are offset by approximately 50% of their width. 14. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the thickness of the leaves of the first multileaf collimator and the thickness of the leaves of the second multileaf collimator are approximately the same. 15. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the thickness of the leaves of the first multileaf collimator and the thickness of the leaves of the second multileaf collimator are each sufficient to fully attenuate the radiation beam for medical radiation therapy. 16. The collimating system of claim 15 wherein the thickness of the leaves of both the first multileaf collimator and the second multileaf collimator are approximately 5.5 cm. 17. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the mating surfaces of the leaves are straight edged. 18. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the mating surfaces of the leaves are machined to provide a tongue and groove interface. 19. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the mating surfaces of the leaves are machined to provide a step interface. 20. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein leaves of the first and second multileaf collimators comprise leaf assemblies utilizing a frame separate from an attenuating material. 21. The collimating system of claim 20 wherein the frame is made from a stainless steel alloy and the attenuating material is a tungsten alloy. 22. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the first multileaf collimator has two banks and each bank includes 34 leaves and wherein the second multileaf collimator has two banks and each bank includes 35 leaves. 23. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the edge of the collimating system closest to the target is less than 60 cm from a radiation isocenter. 24. The collimating system of claim 1 wherein the system does not include collimator jaws.
varying the contour of the field, e.g. multileaf collimators · CPC title
Beam delivery systems · CPC title
using a multi-leaf collimator, e.g. for intensity modulated radiation therapy or IMRT · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.