Generative design pipeline for urban and neighborhood planning
US-12147737-B2 · Nov 19, 2024 · US
US9959371B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9959371-B2 |
| Application number | US-201314428122-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 20, 2013 |
| Priority date | Sep 12, 2012 |
| Publication date | May 1, 2018 |
| Grant date | May 1, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method and system is disclosed for maintaining Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) of a new data center constant or within narrow range around efficient level during ramping up stage of the data center. The method comprises of capturing a plurality of design and operational parameters of the data center, computing an efficient design for the data center at full occupancy, and maintaining the Power Usage Effectiveness constant or within narrow range around efficient level at a current occupancy during a ramp up period of the data center.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A method for efficient configuration of a data center at full occupancy, having an initial empty occupancy level, the method comprising: capturing a plurality of design parameters of a data center at an empty occupancy level; identifying, based on the design parameters, a plurality of partitioned designs for the data center at the empty occupancy level; determining a plurality of rack placements and heat load distribution amongst racks within each of the partitioned designs; mapping cooling infrastructure parameters associated with each of the rack placements and the heat load distribution for at least one partitioned design; analyzing cooling performance for the mapped cooling infrastructure parameters using a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tool; determining Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) using a PUE predictor tool for each of the partitioned designs by integrating an information technology (IT) power predictor to calculate power consumed by an IT equipment upon classifying the IT equipment based on type and manufacturer, a cooling power predictor to calculate power consumed by the cooling infrastructure taking into account of design parameters and operating parameters related to the cooling infrastructure, and a power losses predictor to calculate power consumed in lighting and losses in power distribution by estimating correlation of efficiency and loading level of an equipment, and calculating a total data center power as sum of an IT power calculated from the IT power predictor, a cooling power calculated from the cooling power predictor, and power losses calculated from the power losses predictor; and configuring the data center based on a partitioned design among the partitioned designs having optimum cooling performance and lowest PUE upon determining efficient combination of the rack placement, the heat load distribution and cooling related variables. 2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the design parameters include at least one of parameters associated with the data center having empty occupancy level, cooling infrastructure, a computer room air conditioner (CRAC), plenum and placement of airflow altering components such as baffles or panels. 3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the cooling infrastructure parameters comprise CRAC placement, tile placement, panel placement, and operating parameters of CRAC. 4. The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the operating parameters of CRAC are associated with supply temperature and flow rates of CRAC. 5. A processor implemented method for dynamically maintaining Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) of a data center constant or within a narrow range around an efficient level during a ramp up period, the method comprising: capturing a plurality of design and operational parameters at an occupancy of a data center at a point in time; determining placements of servers based on the design and operational parameters; mapping cooling infrastructure parameters for the placements of servers; analyzing cooling performance for the placements of servers using a CFD tool; determining PUE using a PUE predictor tool for the placements of servers by integrating an information technology (IT) power predictor to calculate power consumed by an IT equipment upon classifying the IT equipment based on type and manufacturer, a cooling power predictor to calculate power consumed by the cooling infrastructure taking into account of design parameters and operating parameters related to the cooling infrastructure, and a power losses predictor to calculate power consumed in lighting and losses in power distribution by estimating correlation of efficiency and loading level of an equipment, and calculating a total data center power as sum of an IT power calculated from the IT power predictor, a cooling power calculated from the cooling power predictor, and power losses calculated from the power losses predictor; and configuring and operating the data center based on a placement of servers among the placements having lowest PUE upon determining efficient combination of a rack placement, a heat load distribution and cooling related variables, and optimum cooling performance. 6. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the design parameters include at least one of cooling infrastructure, a computer room air conditioner (CRAC), racks, heat generating equipment in racks, placement of components such as CRAC, tiles, plenum, racks, or placement of airflow altering components such as baffles or panels; and the operational parameters include at least one of supply temperature and flow rates of CRAC, actual power consumed by racks, or airflow of racks. 7. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the cooling infrastructure parameters include at least one of CRAC placement, tile placement, panel placement, or operating parameters of CRAC. 8. The method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the operating parameters of CRAC include at least one of supply temperature or flow rates of CRAC. 9. A system for efficient configuration of a data center at full occupancy, having an initial empty occupancy level, the system comprising: a memory device that stores a set of instructions; and at least one processor to execute the instructions to: capture a plurality of design parameters of a data center at an empty occupancy level; identify, using the design parameters, a plurality of partitioned designs for the data center at the empty occupancy level; determine a plurality of rack placements and heat load distribution amongst racks within each of the partitioned designs; map cooling infrastructure parameters associated with each of the rack placements and the heat load distribution for at least one partitioned design; analyze cooling performance for the mapped cooling infrastructure parameters using a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tool; determine Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) using a PUE predictor tool for each of the partitioned designs by integrating an information technology (IT) power predictor to calculate power consumed by an IT equipment upon classifying the IT equipment based on type and manufacturer, a cooling power predictor to calculate power consumed by the cooling infrastructure taking into account of design parameters and operating parameters related to the cooling infrastructure, and a power losses predictor to calculate power consumed in lighting and losses in power distribution by estimating correlation of efficiency and loading level of an equipment, and calculating a total data center power as sum of an IT power calculated from the IT power predictor, a cooling power calculated from the cooling power predictor, and power losses calculated from the power losses predictor; and configure the data center based on a partitioned design among the partitioned designs having optimum cooling performance and lowest PUE upon determining efficient combination of the rack placement, the heat load distribution and cooling related variables. 10. The system as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the design parameters include at least one of parameters associated with the data center having empty occupancy level, cooling infrastructure, a computer room air conditioner (CRAC), plenum and placement of airflow altering components such as baffles or panels. 11. The system as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the cooling infrastructure parameters comprise CRAC placement, tile placement, panel placement, and operating parameters of CRAC. 12. The system as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the operating parameters of CRAC are associated with supply temperature and flow rates of CRAC.
Thermal management, e.g. server temperature control · CPC title
Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads · CPC title
Floor-planning or layout, e.g. partitioning or placement · CPC title
Thermal analysis or thermal optimisation · CPC title
Power analysis or power optimisation · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.