System for linking diverse data systems
US-2016314202-A1 · Oct 27, 2016 · US
US9959324B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9959324-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514669096-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 26, 2015 |
| Priority date | Mar 26, 2015 |
| Publication date | May 1, 2018 |
| Grant date | May 1, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method to search for at least one relationship pattern in a plurality of runtime artifacts is provided. The method may include detecting at least one data manipulation statement in the plurality of runtime artifacts. The method may also include extracting at least one relationship clause from the detected at least one data manipulation statement. The method may further include parsing the extracted at least one relationship clause. The method may include generating at least one normalized syntax tree based on the parsed at least one relationship clause. The method may also include performing a classification and a snippet discovery on the generated at least one normalized syntax tree.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method to search for at least one relationship pattern in a plurality of runtime artifacts, the method comprising: detecting at least one data manipulation statement in the plurality of artifacts; extracting at least one relationship clause from the detected at least one data manipulation statement; parsing the extracted at least one relationship clause; generating at least one normalized syntax tree based on the parsed at least one relationship clause; and performing a classification and a snippet discovery on the generated at least one normalized syntax tree. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: clustering a plurality of common relationship clauses according to a plurality of linkages that link a plurality of data sources together; and storing the plurality of common relationship clauses and the plurality of linkages. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the plurality of common relationship clauses and the plurality of linkages are stored according to at least one of a class, a cluster or a syntax tree. 4. The method of claim 2 , further comprising: proposing a list comprising the clustered common relationship clauses to a user for validation; and providing a search capability to retrieve at least one probable relationship between at least one of a plurality of data elements, a plurality of business terms, and a plurality of data elements and a plurality of business terms. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of runtime artifacts is associated with a data source comprising at least one of an ETL, a database view, a database SQL procedure, a batch file, a plurality of reporting tool metadata, a metadata server, a program, and a script. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein performing a classification comprises classifying a plurality of common relationship clauses according to at least one of a uni-directional classification, a bi-directional classification, and a mapping classification. 7. The method of claim 2 , wherein the clustering the plurality of common relationship clauses is performed using a plurality of analytic algorithms. 8. A computer system to search for at least one relationship pattern in a plurality of runtime artifacts, the computer system comprising: one or more processors, one or more computer-readable memories, one or more computer-readable tangible storage devices, and program instructions stored on at least one of the one or more storage devices for execution by at least one of the one or more processors via at least one of the one or more memories, wherein the computer system is capable of performing a method comprising: detecting at least one data manipulation statement in the plurality of runtime artifacts; extracting at least one relationship clause from the detected at least one data manipulation statement; parsing the extracted at least one relationship clause; generating at least one normalized syntax tree based on the parsed at least one relationship clause; and performing a classification and a snippet discovery on the generated at least one normalized syntax tree. 9. The computer system of claim 8 , further comprising: clustering a plurality of common relationship clauses according to a plurality of linkages that link a plurality of data sources together; and storing the plurality of common relationship clauses and the plurality of linkages. 10. The computer system of claim 9 , wherein the plurality of common relationship clauses and the plurality of linkages are stored according to at least one of a class, a cluster or a syntax tree. 11. The computer system of claim 9 , further comprising: proposing a list comprising the clustered common relationship clauses to a user for validation; and providing a search capability to retrieve at least one probable relationship between at least one of a plurality of data elements, a plurality of business terms, and a plurality of data elements and a plurality of business terms. 12. The computer system of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of runtimes is associated with a data source comprising at least one of an ETL, a database view, a database SQL procedure, a batch file, a plurality of reporting tool metadata, a metadata server, a program, and a script. 13. The computer system of claim 8 , wherein performing a classification comprises classifying a plurality of common relationship clauses according to at least one of a uni-directional classification, a bi-directional classification, and a mapping classification. 14. The computer system of claim 9 , wherein the clustering the plurality of common relationship clauses is performed using a plurality of analytic algorithms. 15. A computer program product, to search for at least one relationship pattern in a plurality of runtime artifacts, the computer program product comprising: one or more computer-readable storage devices and program instructions stored on at least one of the one or more tangible storage devices, the program instructions executable by a processor, the program instructions comprising: program instructions to detect at least one data manipulation statement in the plurality of runtime artifacts; program instructions to extract at least one relationship clause from the detected at least one data manipulation statement; program instructions to parse the extracted at least one relationship clause; program instructions to generate at least one normalized syntax tree based on the parsed at least one relationship clause; and program instructions to perform a classification and a snippet discovery on the generated at least one normalized syntax tree. 16. The computer program product of claim 15 , further comprising: program instructions to cluster a plurality of common relationship clauses according to a plurality of linkages that link a plurality of data sources together; and program instructions to store the plurality of common relationship clauses and the plurality of linkages. 17. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the plurality of common relationship clauses and the plurality of linkages are stored according to at least one of a class, a cluster or a syntax tree. 18. The computer program product of claim 16 , further comprising: program instructions to propose a list comprising the clustered common relationship clauses to a user for validation; and program instructions to provide a search capability to retrieve at least one probable relationship between at least one of a plurality of data elements, a plurality of business terms, and a plurality of data elements and a plurality of business terms. 19. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the plurality of runtime artifacts is associated with a data source comprising at least one of an ETL, a database view, a database SQL procedure, a batch file, a plurality of reporting tool metadata, a metadata server, a program, and a script. 20. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein performing a classification comprises classifying a plurality of common relationship clauses according to at least one of a uni-directional classification, a bi-directional classification, and a mapping classification.
Query processing support for facilitating data mining operations in structured databases · CPC title
of sub-queries or views · CPC title
of query operations · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.