Process for the selective hydrogenation of olefinic feeds with a single principal reactor and a guard reactor of reduced size

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9957207-B2
Application number	US-201615388220-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Dec 22, 2016
Priority date	Dec 22, 2015
Publication date	May 1, 2018
Grant date	May 1, 2018

Abstract

The present invention relates to a process for the selective hydrogenation of a feed of hydrocarbons containing polyunsaturated molecules comprising at least 3 carbon atoms, using a single principal fixed bed reactor R 1 containing at least two catalytic beds A 1 and A 2 and a fixed bed guard reactor which is reduced in size, said hydrogenation reactors being disposed in series for use in a cyclic manner in accordance with a sequence of steps which can be used to short-circuit the catalytic bed or beds of the principal reactor which have been at least partially deactivated with the aid of the guard reactor, while ensuring the continuous operation of the process.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A process for the selective hydrogenation of a feed of hydrocarbons containing polyunsaturated molecules comprising at least 3 carbon atoms, in which said feed and a gaseous phase comprising hydrogen are passed, under hydrogenation conditions, over a hydrogenation catalyst in a single principal fixed bed reactor containing at least two catalytic beds and a fixed bed guard reactor which is smaller in size containing at least one catalytic bed, said reactors being disposed in series for use in a cyclic manner by repeating the steps a), b), c), c′), d) and d′) defined below in succession:
a step a), during which the feed passes in succession through all of the catalytic beds of the principal reactor,
when the first catalytic bed of the principal reactor starts to become deactivated, a step b), during which the feed is introduced into the guard reactor then, by short-circuiting the first partially deactivated catalytic bed of the principal reactor, into the next non-deactivated catalytic bed of said principal reactor located immediately downstream with respect to the direction of movement of the feed,
a step c), during which the feed passes uniquely and successively through all of the catalytic beds of the principal reactor,
a step c′), simultaneously with step c), during which the deactivated catalyst of the catalytic bed or beds of the guard reactor is regenerated and/or replaced with fresh catalyst,
a step d), during which the feed only passes through the guard reactor,
a step d′), simultaneously with step d), during which the deactivated catalyst of the at least two catalytic beds of the principal reactor is regenerated and/or replaced with fresh catalyst.

2. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which the total volume of catalyst contained in the catalytic bed or beds of the guard reactor is a maximum of 60% of the total volume of catalyst contained in the catalytic beds of the principal reactor.

3. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which the hydrocarbon feed is selected from the group constituted by a C3 cut from steam cracking, a C4 cut from steam cracking, a C5 cut from steam cracking and a pyrolysis gasoline, and a mixture thereof.

4. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which a step a′) is carried out simultaneously with step a), during which the catalyst deactivated during step d) of the catalytic bed or beds of the guard reactor is regenerated or replaced with fresh catalyst.

5. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which the period of operation for each of steps a), b), c) and d), defined with respect to a maximum operating period t max for each step, which is the time to reach a maximum tolerable value for a temperature or a selectivity for a given feed, is respectively:
for step a): between 10% and 70% of t Amax
for step b): between 40% and 100% of t Bmax
for step c): between 90% and 100% of t Cmax
for step d): between 70% and 100% of t Dmax .

6. The process as claimed in claim 5 , in which:
the maximum tolerable value for a C3 feed is the selectivity in accordance with the specifications in force;
the maximum tolerable value for a C4 feed is a maximum temperature of 160° C.;
the maximum tolerable value for a C5 feed is a maximum temperature of 160° C.;
the maximum tolerable value for a feed of pyrolysis gasoline is a maximum temperature of 200° C.

7. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which each reactor is operated at a temperature of 0° C. to 200° C., at a pressure in the range 1 to 6.5 MPa and at an overall hourly space velocity, defined as the ratio of the volume flow rate of the fresh feed at 15° C. to the total volume of catalyst present in the series of reactors employed, in the range 1 h −1 to 100 h −1 .

8. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which a portion of the effluent obtained from the principal reactor or from the guard reactor is recycled as a mixture with the feed to be hydrogenated.

9. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which the operating conditions for hydrogenation during steps a) b) c) and d) are identical.

10. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which during step d), the temperature of the guard reactor is increased and/or the flow of the phase comprising hydrogen is increased, and/or the recycle flow rate into the guard reactor is increased and/or the flow rate of feed introduced into the guard reactor is reduced with respect to respectively the temperature, the flow or the flow rate(s) employed at the start of step a).

11. The process as claimed in claim 10 , in which the increase in the temperature of the guard reactor at the head of the reactor at the start of step d) with respect to the start of step a) is in the range 0.5° C. to 40° C.

12. The process as claimed in claim 10 , in which the increase in the recycle flow rate at the guard reactor at the start of step d) with respect to the recycle flow rate at the start of step a) is in the range 0.5% to 100%.

13. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which a quench is introduced between two catalytic beds in the principal reactor or the guard reactor, said quench possibly being a liquid quench and/or a gaseous quench.

14. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which one or more heat exchanger(s) is employed between the guard reactor and the principal reactor.

15. The process as claimed in claim 1 , in which the hydrogenation catalysts used are identical or different in the catalytic bed or beds of the principal reactor and/or of the guard reactor.

Assignees

• Ifp Energies Now

Inventors

• Charra Cyprien
• Mekki-Berrada Adrien
• Bazer-Bachi Frederic
• Fischer Beatrice
• Hilly Florian

Classifications

• B01J8/001

  Controlling catalytic processes (B01J8/1809 takes precedence) · CPC title

• Y02P30/20

  using bio-feedstock · CPC title

• B01J8/0492

  Feeding reactive fluids (for solid material, see B01J8/0015) · CPC title

• B01J2219/00038

  Processes in parallel · CPC title

• B01J8/04

  the fluid passing successively through two or more beds · CPC title