Method for improving a flight trajectory of an aircraft as a function of meteorological conditions

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9940841-B2
Application number	US-201614994007-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jan 12, 2016
Priority date	Jan 30, 2015
Publication date	Apr 10, 2018
Grant date	Apr 10, 2018

Abstract

A navigation aid method to determine an improved trajectory between points of departure and arrival as a function of a trajectory cost, comprises: determining a grid of nodes, loading meteorological data at the nodes, determining for each node, an average instantaneous cost from a first instantaneous cost as a function of a ground speed taking into account meteorological data loaded at the node concerned, and from a second instantaneous cost as a function of a ground speed that does not take into account the loaded meteorological data, determining a length of a trajectory passing through the node and arriving at the point of arrival, determining a cost grid assigning, at each of the nodes of the grid, a local cost determined from the average instantaneous cost and the length, determining an improved trajectory from the cost grid, and graphically representing the improved trajectory and/or the cost grid to a crew.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A navigation aid method, executed by a flight management system to determine an improved trajectory between a point of departure and a point of arrival as a function of a trajectory cost, comprising the steps of:
determining a grid of nodes within an area of predetermined dimensions and comprising the points of departure and of arrival,
loading meteorological data at said nodes,
determining, for each node of the grid of nodes, an average instantaneous cost from a first instantaneous cost that is a function of a predicted ground speed of an aircraft taking into account the meteorological data loaded at the node concerned, and from a second instantaneous cost that is a function of a predicted ground speed of the aircraft that does not take into account the loaded meteorological data,
determining a length of a trajectory passing through said node and arriving at the point of arrival,
determining a cost grid assigning, at each of the nodes of the cost grid, a local cost determined from the average instantaneous cost and said length,
determining the improved trajectory from said cost grid, graphically representing the improved trajectory and/or the cost grid to a crew.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the meteorological data comprise a wind vector and a temperature.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the local cost is equal to a product of said average instantaneous cost and of said length.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the length taken into account for the determination of the local cost corresponds to a sum of great circle distances between the point of departure and said node and between said node and the point of arrival.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the local cost is determined by the formula:
C 1= τ ·( a+b )

with
τ average instantaneous cost,
a great circle distance between a point A and a node P, and
b great circle distance between the node P and the point B.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the length taken into account for the determination of the local cost corresponds to a great circle distance between said node and the point of arrival.

7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the local cost is determined by the formula:
C 2= τ · b

with
τ average instantaneous cost, and
b great circle distance between a node P and a point B.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the average instantaneous cost is defined as a weighted sum of the first and second instantaneous costs, with a predetermined weighting coefficient to parameterise an influence of the meteorological data in the determining of the average instantaneous cost, according to the formula:
τ = w·τ 1+(1− w )·τ2

τ average instantaneous cost,
w weighting coefficient between 0 and 1,
τ 1 first instantaneous cost, and
τ 2 second instantaneous cost.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first and second instantaneous costs are determined at said node from the simplified instantaneous cost formula:

τ
=

1
GS

=

1

TAS
·

cos
⁡

(
d
)

+

Wind
·

cos
⁡

(
a
)

with
GS: ground speed of the aircraft,
TAS: air speed of the aircraft as a function of a temperature T,
Wind: wind vector,
d: angle between the ground speed and the air speed, and
a: angle between the ground speed and the wind vector,
and wherein the first instantaneous cost is determined by said simplified instantaneous cost formula with an air speed and meteorological conditions comprising a wind vector and a temperature determined at a node P, and the second instantaneous cost is determined by said simplified instantaneous cost formula, with a zero wind vector, a standard temperature at the node P and a ground speed equal to a predetermined air speed.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first and second instantaneous costs are determined at said node from the general instantaneous cost formula:

τ
=

FF
+
CI

GS

=

FF
+
CI

TAS
·

cos
⁡

(
d
)

+

Wind
·

cos
⁡

(
a
)

with
FF: fuel flow rate per hour,
CI: Cost Index,
GS: ground speed of the aircraft,
TAS: air speed of the aircraft as a function of a temperature T,
Wind: wind vector,
d: angle between the ground speed and the air speed, and
a: angle between the ground speed and the wind vector,
and wherein the first instantaneous cost is determined by said general instantaneous cost formula with an air speed and meteorological conditions comprising a wind vector and a temperature computed at a node P, and in which the second instantaneous cost is determined by said general instantaneous cost formula, with a zero wind, a standard temperature at the node P and a ground speed equal to a predetermined air speed.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the improved trajectory is determined by the flight management system as the trajectory minimizing the local costs over all of the trajectory.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the improved trajectory is determined by the crew from the graphic representation of the cost grid.

13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the cost grid is represented graphically in the form of a surface.

14. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the cost grid is represented graphically in the form of cost function level curves.

Assignees

• Thales Sa

Inventors

• Pierre Christophe
• Le Merrer Mathieu

Classifications

• G08G5/0021

  Physics · mapped topic

• G01C23/00

  Combined instruments indicating more than one navigational value, e.g. for aircraft; Combined measuring devices for measuring two or more variables of movement, e.g. distance, speed or acceleration · CPC title

• G08G5/0047

  Physics · mapped topic

• G08G5/0039 Primary

  Physics · mapped topic

• G08G5/0052

  Physics · mapped topic