Verifying method and device for consistency of forwarding behaviors of router data based on action codes
US-2016301564-A1 · Oct 13, 2016 · US
US9912576B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9912576-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615099648-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 15, 2016 |
| Priority date | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Publication date | Mar 6, 2018 |
| Grant date | Mar 6, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present disclosure provides a method and system for detecting normalization of forwarding behavior of a router in a core routing area. The method includes: obtaining data flow received by ports of a core router; performing matching check to the data flow according to the data flow state table; if the data flow does not match the data flow state table, checking state of the data flow to calculate a state check result S(i); determining whether the data flow state table needs to be updated, if yes, updating the data flow state table; and determining whether the state check result S(i) is a trigger state, if yes, calculate state r of the forwarding behavior of the core router, and determining whether the forwarding behavior of the core router is abnormal according to the state r of the forwarding behavior of the core router, if yes, generating an alert log.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for detecting normalization of forwarding behavior of a router in a core routing area, comprising following steps: obtaining data flow received by ports of a to-be-detected core router which are directly connected to peripheral network equipment; generating a data flow state table initially, and performing matching check to the data flow according to the data flow state table; if the data flow does not match the data flow state table, checking state of the data flow to obtain characteristic parameters of the data flow to calculate a state check result S(i); determining whether the data flow state table needs to be updated, if yes, updating the data flow state table; and determining whether the state check result S(i) is a trigger state, if yes, using the to-be-detected core router together with the peripheral network equipment to calculate state r of the forwarding behavior of the to-be-detected core router, and determining whether the forwarding behavior of the to-be-detected core router is abnormal according to the state r of the forwarding behavior of the to-be-detected core router, if yes, generating an alert log. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data flow state table comprises: source network segment address, destination network segment address, input port, inquiry port, output port, the state check result S(i), and timer. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the state check result S(i) satisfies following expressions: S ( i )= f a ( x 1 ,x 2 )⊕ f b ( x 3 )| f a =0 +f a ( x 1 ,x 2 )⊕ f c ( x 4 )| f a =1 , when initially f a =0, f b =1, f c =0. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the state r of the forwarding behavior of the core router satisfies a following expression: r = ∑ n j = 0 p ( j ) , and p(j) represents a port state corresponding to port j of the core router, and j=0, 1, 2, . . . , n, p(j) is initially equal to zero, and p(j) is obtained according to determination of the state check result S(i). 5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising: when r≠0, determining the forwarding behavior of the core router is abnormal. 6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: when one of following conditions is satisfied, updating the data flow state table: 1) storing a new entry corresponding a update entry for the data flow state table which is generated in step S 3 ; 2) synchronization with dynamic change of a routing table being needed; 3) number of stored entry list of the data flow state table reaching a upper limit or timer being overdue. 7. A system for detecting normalization of forwarding behavior of a router in a core routing area, comprising: one or more hardware processor coupled to a memory, wherein the memory stores an obtaining module, a determining module and a processing module, wherein: the obtaining module is configured to obtain port states P(j) of each to-be-detected router in the core routing area, one router in the core routing area being a peripheral network equipment to another router in the core routing area, data-flow matching check is performed to all peripheral network equipment, by using the method of claim 1 , to generate the port states of a router whose forwarding behavior is abnormal, allowing the obtaining module to obtain; the determining module is configured to calculate state r(k) of the forwarding behavior of each to-be-detected router in the core routing area, and determine whether r(k) is equal to zero, and if no, determine the forwarding behavior of a router k is abnormal; and the processing module is configured to calculate state R of the forwarding behavior in the core routing area, and determine whether abnormal forwarding behavior exists in the core routing area according to the state R of the forwarding behavior, and if yes, generate an alert log. 8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the state r(k) of the forwarding behavior of each to-be-detected router satisfies a following expression: r ( k ) = ∑ n j = 0 P k ( j ) , and P k (j) represents a port state corresponding to port j of the k-th to-be-detected router, and j=0, 1, 2, . . . , n, and r(k) is initially equal to zero. 9. The system of claim 7 , wherein the state R of the forwarding behavior in the core routing area satisfies a following expression: R = ∑ m k = 1 r ( k ) , k=1, 2, . . . , m, and m is number of the core router in the core routing area, and initially, R=0, if R after calculation is not equal to zero, the abnormal forwarding behavior existing in the core routing area is determined and the alert log is generated. 10. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored therein instructions that, when executed by a processor of a device, causes the device to perform a method for detecting normalization of forwarding behavior of a router in a core routing area, wherein the method comprises following steps: obtaining data flow received by ports of a to-be-detected core router which are directly connected to peripheral network equipment; generating a data flow state table initially, and performing matching check to the data flow according to the data flow state table; if the data flow does not match the data flow state table, checking state of the data flow to obtain a state check result S(i) by obtaining characteristic parameters of the data flow; determining whether the data flow state table needs to be updated, if yes, updating the data flow s
Flow based routing · CPC title
Single bridge functionality, e.g. connection of two networks over a single bridge · CPC title
involving identification of individual flows · CPC title
using route fault recovery · CPC title
Ensuring consistency of routing table updates, e.g. by using epoch numbers · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.