Vehicle emergency evacuation device
US-9205816-B2 · Dec 8, 2015 · US
US9908410B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9908410-B2 |
| Application number | US-201214356472-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 18, 2012 |
| Priority date | Nov 7, 2011 |
| Publication date | Mar 6, 2018 |
| Grant date | Mar 6, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In a method for warning the driver of a motor vehicle in the event of lack of attention, in order to improve the acceptance of such systems among drivers, it is provided to monitor the driver with regard to lack of attention and also to ascertain the instantaneous driving situation of the vehicle, and, if lack of attention of the driver has been determined, to output a warning signal only in certain driving situations, but not in others.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for warning a driver of a host motor vehicle in the event of a lack of attention by the driver, comprising: monitoring the driver's attention level to ascertain a lack of attention by the driver; ascertaining a driving situation of the vehicle; detecting whether the driving situation of the vehicle includes at least one predefined condition requiring the driver to be alert; designating the driving situation of the vehicle as critical if the at least one predefined condition is detected and designating the driving situation of the vehicle as noncritical if the at least one predefined condition is not detected; generating, in the event the lack of attention by the driver has been ascertained, a warning signal only if the driving situation of the vehicle is designated as critical; in response to the determination that the driver is lacking attention and to the designating of the driving situation as non-critical, suppressing the generating of the warning signal. 2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the intensity of the generated warning signal is varied as a function of a risk potential of the driving situation of the vehicle. 3. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a critical driving situation is defined by at least one of the following conditions: the speed of the host vehicle is greater than a predefined threshold value; the host vehicle is one of crossing an intersection or approaching the intersection; the host vehicle is being driven on a route including one of a mountain road, twisting turns, deer crossings, a school zone or a crosswalk; the host vehicle is in the proximity of a rear end of one of a traffic jam or a construction site; weather conditions including one of rain, fog, snow or freezing temperatures; the host vehicle is pulling a trailer; and the host vehicle is being driven in the dark. 4. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a noncritical driving situation is defined by at least one of the following conditions: the speed of the host vehicle is less than a predefined threshold value; the host vehicle is not crossing an intersection and not approaching the intersection; the host vehicle is not being driven on a route including one of a mountain road, twisting turns, deer crossings, a school zone or a crosswalk; the host vehicle is not in the proximity of a rear end of one of a traffic jam or a construction site; weather conditions do not include any one of rain, fog, snow or freezing temperatures; the host vehicle is not pulling a trailer; and the host vehicle is being driven in during daylight hours. 5. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a driving behavior of the driver is monitored using at least one sensor, and a lack of attention by the driver is ascertained from sensor data output by the at least one sensor. 6. The method as recited in claim 5 , wherein the driving behavior of the driver is monitored using output signals generated by at least one of an in-car camera, a steering wheel sensor, a brake pedal sensor, or an accelerator pedal sensor. 7. A device for warning a driver of a host motor vehicle in the event of a lack of attention by the driver, comprising: a first sensor for monitoring signals relating to the driver's attention level to ascertain a lack of attention by the driver; a second sensor for ascertaining a driving situation of the vehicle; and a control unit configured to (i) evaluate output signals of the first sensor and the second sensor for ascertaining the driving situation of the vehicle, (ii) detect whether the driving situation of the vehicle includes at least one predefined condition requiring the driver to be alert, (iii) designate the driving situation of the vehicle as critical if the at least one predefined condition is detected and designate the driving situation of the vehicle as noncritical if the at least one predefined condition is not detected, and (iv) generate, in the event the lack of attention by the driver has been ascertained, a warning only if the driving situation of the vehicle is designated as critical, wherein in response to the determination that the driver is lacking attention and to the designating of the driving situation as non-critical, suppressing the generating of the warning.
Ambient conditions, e.g. wind or rain · CPC title
Incapacity · CPC title
detecting absence of activity per se · CPC title
Input parameters relating to objects · CPC title
responsive to incapacity of driver · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.