Method of preventing misoperations about a relay protection device in a smart substation

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9904588-B2
Application number	US-201615076361-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Mar 21, 2016
Priority date	Aug 31, 2015
Publication date	Feb 27, 2018
Grant date	Feb 27, 2018

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method of preventing misoperation about a relay protection device in a smart substation. Reversely operating CPU operation results of two operation records about the relay protection device, in order to form corresponding disassembler codes. According to disassembler codes, calculating similarity of the CPU operation results of the two operation records about the relay protection device by a structured method. Judging whether the similarity is greater than a set threshold or not. If the similarity is greater than the set threshold, the CPU operation results of the two operation records about the relay protection device to be the same, otherwise, the CPU operation results of the two operation records about the relay protection device are judged to be different. The present invention avoids the misoperations of the relay protection device on operation.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A method of preventing misoperation about a relay protection device in smart substation, characterized by comprising:
1) in order to form corresponding disassembler codes, reversely operating CPU operation results of two operation records about the relay protection device;
2) according to disassembler codes, calculating similarity of the CPU operation results of the two operation records about the relay protection device by a structured method;
3) in order to realize discriminant of the misoperation, judging whether the similarity is greater than a set threshold or not, if the similarity is greater than the set threshold, the CPU operation results of the two operation records about the relay protection device are judged to be the same, otherwise, the CPU operation results of the two operation records about the relay protection device are judged to be different,
wherein the processes of calculating the similarity by the structured method which is mentioned at step 2) are as follows:
A. respectively extracting function structure information in the disassembler codes of the two operation records;
B. generating signatures of all functions and basic blocks in the disassembler codes, and determining a function matching set according to the signatures;
C. comparing internal basic blocks of matching function pairs, and determining similarity of the functions;
D. calculating the similarity of the CPU operation results of the two operation records about the relay protection device according to weight and corresponding similarity of each function; and
wherein, the similarity S of the CPU operation results of the two operation records about the relay protection device is as follows:

S
=

∑

(

S
i

·

λ
i

)

∑

λ
i

×
100
⁢
%

therein, Si is the similarity of the functions i, and λi is the weight of each function i.

2. The method of claim 1 , characterized in that, a calculation formula of the weight of each function λ is as follows:
λ=√{square root over (ω call 2 +ω node 2 +ω edge 2 )}

therein, ω call 2 is a function call number, ω node 2 is a basic block number, and ω edge 2 is a jumping edge number.

3. The method of claim 2 , characterized in that, the similarity of functions Si is determined as follows:
S i =matching basic block number between new operation record function i and old operation record function j/including basic block number between new operation record function i and old operation record function j (i=1, 2, . . . , n; j=1, 2, . . . , m)
therein, n is number of the new operation record function, and m is number of the old operation record function j.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein step 1) to step 3) is conducted by an analysis module of a FLASH memory which is set in the relay protection device.

5. The method of claim 4 , characterized in that, the method further comprises a step of showing a judgment result that comes from the step 3).

Assignees

• Xj Group Corp
• Xj Electric Co Ltd
• Xuchang Xj Software Tech Ltd
• State Grid Corp China
• Xj Electric Co Ltd
• Xuchang Xj Software Tech Ltd

Inventors

• Wang Leitao
• Li Zhen
• Qiu Junhong
• Liu Xing
• Ma Lintao
• Zhang Lunshan
• Jiang Ruizhi
• Li Xinling
• Ji Juan
• Li Meng
• Zhao Bao
• Jia Huawei

Classifications

• G06F11/0721 Primary

  within a central processing unit [CPU] · CPC title

• H02H1/0092

  concerning the data processing means, e.g. expert systems, neural networks · CPC title

• G06F11/0793 Primary

  Remedial or corrective actions (recovery from an exception in an instruction pipeline G06F9/3861; by retry G06F11/1402; for recovering from a failure of a protocol instance or entity H04L69/40) · CPC title

• G06F11/0751

  Error or fault detection not based on redundancy (power supply failures G06F1/30; network fault management H04L41/06) · CPC title