Control system in an industrial gas pipeline network to satisfy energy consumption constraints at production plants

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9897260-B1
Application number	US-201715490308-A
Country	US
Kind code	B1
Filing date	Apr 18, 2017
Priority date	Apr 18, 2017
Publication date	Feb 20, 2018
Grant date	Feb 20, 2018

Abstract

Controlling flow of gas in an gas pipeline network, wherein flow of gas within each of the pipeline segments is associated with a direction (positive or negative). Processors calculate minimum and maximum production rates (bounds) at the gas production plant to satisfy an energy consumption constraint over a period of time. The production rate bounds are used to calculate minimum and maximum signed flow rates (bounds) for each pipeline segment. A nonlinear pressure drop relationship is linearized to create a linear pressure drop model for each pipeline segment. A network flow solution is calculated, using the linear pressure drop model, comprising flow rates for each pipeline segment to satisfy demand constraints and pressures for each of a plurality of network nodes over the period of time to satisfy pressure constraints. The network flow solution is associated with control element setpoints used to control one or more control elements.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A system for controlling flow of gas in an industrial gas pipeline network to satisfy energy consumption constraints at an industrial gas production plant, comprising:
a gas pipeline network comprising at least one gas production plant, at least one gas receipt facility of a customer, a plurality of pipeline segments, a plurality of network nodes, and a plurality of control elements,
wherein flow of gas within each of the plurality of pipeline segments is associated with a direction, the direction being associated with a positive sign or a negative sign;

one or more controllers; and
one or more processors configured to:
calculate a minimum production rate and a maximum production rate at the gas production plant to satisfy a constraint on consumption of an energy input over a period of time, the minimum production rate and the maximum production rate comprising bounds on the production rate for the plant;
use the bounds on the production rate for the plant to calculate a minimum signed flow rate and a maximum signed flow rate for each of the pipeline segments, the minimum signed flow rate and the maximum signed flow rate constituting flow bounds for each pipeline segment;
linearize a nonlinear pressure drop relationship for each of the plurality of pipeline segments within the flow bounds to create a linear pressure drop model for each of the plurality of pipeline segments; and
calculate a network flow solution, using the linear pressure drop model, comprising flow rates for each of the plurality of pipeline segments to satisfy demand constraints and pressures for each of the plurality of network nodes over the period of time to satisfy pressure constraints, the network flow solution being associated with control element setpoints;

at least one of the controllers receiving data describing the control element setpoints; and controlling at least some of the plurality of control elements using the data describing the control element setpoints;
wherein the one or more processors are further configured to calculate the minimum signed flow rate and the maximum signed flow rate by:
bisecting an undirected graph representing the gas pipeline network using at least one of the plurality of pipeline segments to create a left subgraph and right subgraph;
calculating a minimum undersupply in the left subgraph by subtracting a sum of demand rates for each of the gas receipt facilities in the left subgraph from a sum of minimum production rates for each of the gas production plants in the left subgraph;
calculating a minimum unmet demand in the right subgraph by subtracting a sum of maximum production rates for each of the gas production plants in the right subgraph from a sum of demand rates for each of the gas receipt facilities in the right subgraph;
calculating the minimum signed flow rate for at least one of the pipeline segments as a maximum of a minimum undersupply in the left subgraph and a minimum unmet demand in the right subgraph;
calculating a maximum oversupply in the left subgraph by subtracting the sum of the demand rates for each of the gas receipt facilities in the left subgraph from the sum of the maximum production rates for each of the gas production plants in the left subgraph;
calculating a maximum unmet demand in the right subgraph by subtracting a sum of the minimum production rates for each of the gas production plants in the right subgraph from the sum of the demand rates for each of the gas receipt facilities in the right subgraph; and
calculating the maximum signed flow rate for at least one of the pipeline segments as a minimum of the maximum oversupply in the left subgraph and the maximum unmet demand in the right subgraph.

2. The system of claim 1 , where a linear model relating energy consumption to industrial gas production is used to calculate the minimum production rate and the maximum production rate at the industrial gas production plant to satisfy a constraint on consumption of energy over the period of time.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the linear model is developed using a transfer function model.

4. The system of claim 1 , ramping constraints on the industrial gas production plant over the period of time are considered in connection with calculating the network flow solution.

5. The system of claim 1 , where an error in pressure prediction for each of the plurality of network nodes is bounded and the bounds are used to ensure that the network flow solution produced using the linearized pressure drop model satisfies pressure constraints when a nonlinear pressure drop model is used.

6. The system of claim 1 , where the linear pressure drop model for one of the pipeline segments is a least-squares fit of the nonlinear pressure drop relationship within a minimum and a maximum flow range for the pipeline segment.

7. The system of claim 1 , where a slope-intercept model is used if an allowable flow range does not include a zero flow condition and a slope-only model is used if the allowable flow range does include a zero flow condition.

8. The system of claim 1 , where a linear program is used to create the network flow solution.

9. The system of claim 1 , where the control element comprises a steam methane reformer plant.

10. The system of claim 1 , where the flow control element comprises an air separation unit.

11. The system of claim 1 , where the flow control element comprises a compressor system.

12. The system of claim 1 , where the energy input is a flow of natural gas and the industrial gas is hydrogen.

13. The system of claim 1 , where the energy input is refinery fuel gas and the industrial gas is hydrogen.

Assignees

• Air Prod & Chem

Inventors

• Mancilla Camilo
• Esmaili Ali
• Isom Joshua David
• Latshaw Catherine Catino
• Smith Iv Oliver Jacob

Classifications

• G05D7/0635 Primary

  by action on throttling means (G05D7/0688, G05D7/0694 take precedence) · CPC title

• F17D5/005

  of gas pipelines, e.g. alarm · CPC title

• F17D3/01 Primary

  for controlling, signalling, or supervising the conveyance of a product · CPC title

• F17D1/04

  for distribution of gas · CPC title

• G05D7/0629

  characterised by the type of regulator means · CPC title