Drive resources in storage library behind virtual library

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9880906-B2
Application number	US-76948507-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jun 27, 2007
Priority date	Jun 27, 2007
Publication date	Jan 30, 2018
Grant date	Jan 30, 2018

Abstract

Embodiments include methods, apparatus, and systems for managing resources in a physical storage library behind a virtual storage library. In one embodiment, priorities are assigned to copy applications and rules determine which when applications are assigned to resources in the physical storage library.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A virtual storage system, comprising:
a virtual storage library having virtual storage devices to emulate physical storage devices of a physical storage library; and
a controller to:
share tape drive resources in the physical storage library with plural different contending copy applications in the virtual storage library without creating separate pools of tape drives reserved for each of the plural different contending copy applications, and
use user-defined policy rules to determine which of the plural different contending copy applications in a job queue are assigned to which physical tape drives in the physical storage library,
wherein the plural different contending copy applications include (1) mirroring virtual storage to physical storage, (2) copying physical tapes in the physical storage library under control of a backup application, and (3) using tape cartridges in the physical storage library to extend storage capacity of the virtual storage library.

2. The virtual storage system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is to prioritize the plural different contending copy applications in a queue in the virtual storage library.

3. The virtual storage system of claim 1 wherein the physical storage library includes plural tape drives and each of the plural tape drives can be used on each of the plural different contending copy applications.

4. The virtual storage system of claim 1 further comprising a policy manager to track which of the plural different contending copy applications is using which of plural tape drive resources in the virtual and physical storage libraries.

5. The virtual storage system of claim 1 wherein the controller is further to prioritize externally triggered tape copy jobs higher than tape scan jobs, tape scan jobs higher than user-initiated restores, user-initiated restores higher than internal mirror copy jobs triggered by a backup application, and internal mirror copy jobs triggered by a backup application higher than internal mirror copy jobs triggered by a copy window scheduler.

6. The virtual storage system of claim 1 wherein each of the plural different contending copy applications has access to all available tape drives in the physical storage library.

7. A non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions for causing a computer to execute a method, comprising:
sharing tape drive resources in a physical storage library with plural different contending copy applications in the virtual storage library without creating separate pools of tape drives reserved for each of the plural different contending copy applications, the virtual storage library having virtual storage devices to emulate physical storage devices of a physical storage library, and
using user-defined policy rules to determine which of the plural different contending copy applications in a job queue are assigned to which physical tape drives in the physical storage library,
wherein the plural different contending copy applications include (1) mirroring virtual storage to physical storage, (2) copying physical tapes in the physical storage library under control of a backup application, and (3) using tape cartridges in the physical storage library to extend storage capacity of the virtual storage library.

8. The computer readable medium of claim 7 , the method further comprising assigning a higher priority to externally triggered tape copy jobs and tape scan jobs than internal mirror copy jobs.

9. The computer readable medium of claim 7 , the method further comprising canceling a running lower priority job in a physical tape drive upon receiving a higher priority job so the higher priority job can execute in the physical tape drive.

10. The computer readable medium of claim 7 , the method further comprising limiting how many higher priority externally triggered copy jobs execute at any one time in order to limit how many lower priority copy jobs are canceled by the higher priority externally triggered copy jobs.

11. The computer readable medium of claim 7 , the method further comprising waiting to assign each of the plural different copy applications to a physical tape drive until each of the plural different copy applications start so lower priority jobs execute while higher priority jobs are idle.

12. The computer readable medium of claim 7 , the method further comprising providing all of the plural different copy applications access to all physical tape drives in the physical storage library.

13. The computer readable medium of claim 7 , the method further comprising load balancing copy traffic across tape drive resources in the physical storage library and across plural controllers in the virtual storage library so if one of the plural controllers fails copy jobs are restarted on another of the plural controllers.

14. A method for use with a virtual storage library having virtual storage devices to emulate physical storage devices of a physical storage library, comprising:
sharing tape drive resources in the physical storage library with plural different contending copy applications in the virtual storage library without creating separate pools of tape drives reserved for each of the plural different contending copy applications, and
using user-defined policy rules to determine which of the plural different contending copy applications in a job queue are assigned to which physical tape drives in the physical storage library,
wherein the plural different contending copy applications include (1) mirroring virtual storage to physical storage, (2) copying physical tapes in the physical storage library under control of a backup application, and (3) using tape cartridges in the physical storage library to extend storage capacity of the virtual storage library.

15. The method of claim 14 further comprising, canceling a mirror copy job that is initiating in a physical tape drive in the physical storage library when another copy job with a higher priority is received.

16. The method of claim 14 further comprising, assigning a first priority to tape copy jobs, a second priority to tape scan jobs, and a third priority to user-initiated restore jobs that copy data from a physical tape to a virtual tape.

17. The method of claim 14 further comprising, only assigning a copy job to a physical tape drive once the copy job commences so lower priority copy jobs execute while higher priority copy jobs are idle.

Assignees

• Gold Stephen
• Clark Shannon Moyes
• Hewlett Packard Entpr Dev Lp

Inventors

• Gold Stephen
• Clark Shannon Moyes

Classifications

• G06F3/0686

  Libraries, e.g. tape libraries, jukebox · CPC title

• G06F3/0611

  in relation to response time · CPC title

• G06F3/065

  Replication mechanisms · CPC title

• G06F11/1456

  Hardware arrangements for backup · CPC title

• G06F11/1461 Primary

  Backup scheduling policy · CPC title