Readability awareness in natural language processing systems

US9875300B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9875300-B2
Application numberUS-201615162641-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateMay 24, 2016
Priority dateJan 5, 2016
Publication dateJan 23, 2018
Grant dateJan 23, 2018

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Electronic natural language processing in a natural language processing (NLP) system, such as a Question-Answering (QA) system. A receives electronic text input, in question form, and determines a readability level indicator in the question. The readability level indicator includes at least a grammatical error, a slang term, and a misspelling type. The computer determines a readability level for the electronic text input based on the readability level indicator, and retrieves candidate answers based on the readability level.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method for electronic natural language processing in an electronic natural language processing (NLP) system, comprising: receiving a plurality of natural language documents; determining readability level indicators in the plurality of natural language documents; receiving a query text; assigning a score to the query text based on at least a misspelling type, wherein the misspelling type comprises one or more of: a misspelling in a word falling within a defined range; a misspelling of a word, where the word is found in at least one dictionary, and not found in at least another dictionary; and a number of auto-corrections detected during an input process for the query text, the input process comprising receiving the query text from a user via an input device, and providing, in response to receiving the query text, at least one natural language document whose readability level is within a threshold distance of a readability level of the query text, wherein the readability level of the query text is based on one or more readability level indicators including at least one of a grammatical error, a slang term, and a misspelling type in the query text. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: training a data model based on determining the readability level for the one or more of the plurality of natural language documents. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein further comprising: receiving an electronic text input from a user; querying, based on the electronic text input, a database storing the plurality of natural language documents; and retrieving a set of candidate answers in response to the query, wherein a candidate answer comprises at least a portion of a natural language document. 4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising: identifying the received electronic text input as a question. 5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the NLP system comprises a question-answering (QA) pipeline having a plurality of processing stages, wherein one or more of steps of the method are performed by one or more of the plurality of processing stages, the method further comprising: filtering one or more natural language documents, by at least one processing stage, to exclude one or more natural language documents from processing by at least one other processing stage. 6. The method of claim 3 , wherein retrieving a set of candidate answers in response to the query comprises: defining a score function having as an input at least a readability level, wherein the set of candidate answers comprise natural language documents whose score meets a threshold value. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a readability level for one or more of the plurality of natural language documents based on respective readability level indicators comprises: determining a readability level for at least two portions of at least one natural language document.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Orthographic correction, e.g. spell checking or vowelisation · CPC title

  • Parsing · CPC title

  • Processing or translation of natural language (natural language analysis G06F40/20; semantic analysis G06F40/30) · CPC title

  • G06F40/253Primary

    Grammatical analysis; Style critique · CPC title

  • Summarisation for human users · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9875300B2 cover?
Electronic natural language processing in a natural language processing (NLP) system, such as a Question-Answering (QA) system. A receives electronic text input, in question form, and determines a readability level indicator in the question. The readability level indicator includes at least a grammatical error, a slang term, and a misspelling type. The computer determines a readability level fo…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
IBM
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F40/253. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jan 23 2018 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).