Optimizing CPU requests and limits for a pod based on benchmarked hardware
US-12032466-B2 · Jul 9, 2024 · US
US9875169B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9875169-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514669817-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 26, 2015 |
| Priority date | Mar 26, 2015 |
| Publication date | Jan 23, 2018 |
| Grant date | Jan 23, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method includes receiving an expected growth rate for modeling future capacity utilization for a resource hosting a plurality of processes, each process being associated with a respective workload. The method also includes modifying, in a non-linear capacity utilization model for the resource, the respective workload for a particular process in the plurality of processes based on the expected growth rate, and, in response to modifying the respective workload, determining a change in total capacity utilization for the resource using the non-linear capacity utilization model. The method further includes determining a ratio between the change in the total capacity utilization for the resource and the modification to the respective workload. The method additionally includes modifying, based on the ratio, a configuration of the resource with respect to the particular process in anticipation of the expected growth rate.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method, comprising: receiving an expected growth rate for modeling future capacity utilization for a resource hosting a plurality of processes, each process being associated with a respective workload, wherein the resource is associated with a plurality of computing components, and wherein the plurality of processes comprise (1) system processes that do not experience increased workloads when demand for applications increases and (2) application specific processes; modifying, in a non-linear capacity utilization model for the resource, the respective workload for a particular application specific process in the plurality of processes based on the expected growth rate, wherein the non-linear capacity utilization model (1) characterizes a capacity of the plurality of computing components associated with the resource to service additional workloads regardless of platform characteristics and (2) isolates the system processes from being affected by the modification to the respective workload for the particular application specific process; in response to modifying the respective workload in the non-linear capacity utilization model for the resource, determining a predicted change in total capacity utilization for the resource in the non-linear capacity utilization model; determining that the predicted change in total capacity utilization from the non-linear capacity utilization model exceeds an available capacity of the resource based on a ratio between the predicted change in the total capacity utilization for the resource and the modification to the respective workload; and modifying, based on the ratio, a configuration of the resource with respect to the particular application specific process in anticipation of the expected growth rate. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining a portion of an initial total capacity utilization attributable to the particular application specific process; and in response to modifying the respective workload, determining a ratio between the predicted change in the total capacity utilization for the resource and the portion of the initial total capacity utilization attributable to the particular application specific process. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of processes are divided into a first group, indicative of system-level processes, and a second group, indicative of application processes, and wherein the method further comprises: determining a ratio between a first portion of an initial total capacity utilization attributable to the first group of processes and a second portion of the initial total capacity utilization attributable to the second group of processes. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the resource is a virtual resource, and wherein modifying the configuration of the resource comprises modifying virtual components of the virtual resource. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein modifying the configuration of the resource comprises modifying a physical server infrastructure associated with the resource. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the non-linear capacity utilization model is assembled from a set of models configured to emulate: hardware components associated with the resource; an operating system of the resource; and virtual components associated with the resource. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein modifying the configuration of the resource with respect to the particular application specific process comprises consolidating virtual resources associated with the particular application specific process, wherein the growth rate is negative. 8. A computer configured to access a storage device, the computer comprising: a processor; and a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium storing computer-readable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the computer to perform: receiving an expected growth rate for modeling future capacity utilization for a resource hosting a plurality of processes, each process being associated with a respective workload, wherein the resource is associated with a plurality of computing components, and wherein the plurality of processes comprise (1) system processes that do not experience increased workloads when demand for applications increases and (2) application specific processes; modifying, in a non-linear capacity utilization model for the resource, the respective workload for a particular application specific process in the plurality of processes based on the expected growth rate, wherein the non-linear capacity utilization model (1) characterizes a capacity of the plurality of computing components associated with the resource to service additional workloads regardless of platform characteristics and (2) isolates the system processes from being affected by the modification to the respective workload for the particular application specific process; in response to modifying the respective workload in the non-linear capacity utilization model for the resource, determining a predicted change in total capacity utilization for the resource in the non-linear capacity utilization model; determining that the predicted change in total capacity utilization from the non-linear capacity utilization model exceeds an available capacity of the resource based on a ratio between the predicted change in the total capacity utilization for the resource and the modification to the respective workload; and modifying, based on the ratio, a configuration of the resource with respect to the particular application specific process in anticipation of the expected growth rate. 9. The computer of claim 8 , wherein the computer-readable instructions further cause the computer to perform: determining a portion of an initial total capacity utilization attributable to the particular application specific process; and in response to modifying the respective workload, determining a ratio between the predicted change in the total capacity utilization for the resource and the portion of the initial total capacity utilization attributable to the particular application specific process. 10. The computer of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of processes are divided into a first group, indicative of system-level processes, and a second group, indicative of application processes, and wherein the computer-readable instructions further cause the computer to perform: determining a ratio between a first portion of an initial total capacity utilization attributable to the first group of processes and a second portion of the initial total capacity utilization attributable to the second group of processes. 11. The computer of claim 8 , wherein the resource is a virtual resource, and wherein modifying the configuration of the resource comprises modifying virtual components of the virtual resource. 12. The computer of claim 8 , wherein modifying the configuration of the resource comprises modifying a physical server infrastructure associated with the resource. 13. The computer of claim 8 , wherein the non-linear capacity utilization model is assembled from a set of models configured to emulate: hardware components associated with the resource; an operating system of the resource; and virtual components associated with the resource. 14. The computer of claim 8 , wherein modifying the configuration of the resource with respect to the particular application specific process comprises consolidating virtual resources associated with the particular application specific process, wherein the growth rate is negative. 15. A computer program product comprising: a non-transitory computer-readable stor
Workload prediction · CPC title
Performance evaluation by statistical analysis · CPC title
for planning or managing the needed capacity · CPC title
Logical partitioning of resources; Management or configuration of virtualized resources (specific details on emulation or internal functioning of virtual machines G06F9/455) · CPC title
Grid computing · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.