Method and system for a hot standby concept for redundant network systems
US-2024380650-A1 · Nov 14, 2024 · US
US9871708B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9871708-B2 |
| Application number | US-201213412960-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 6, 2012 |
| Priority date | Sep 7, 2009 |
| Publication date | Jan 16, 2018 |
| Grant date | Jan 16, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present invention provides a protection switching method of a node having communication failure in a ring, in a communication network. In one embodiment, this is accomplished by checking for loss of signal (LOS) at the non-ERPS device or at least one of the node in a communication channel, checking periodically for Continuity Check Message (CCM) at both the node, wherein the CCMs are periodically transmitted from both the node through at least one non-ERPS device, appropriately setting a Remote Destination Indication (RDI) bit in the Continuity Check Message (CCM) generated from at least one node and transmits the same via the non-ERPS device or through the non-ERPS device or through a disjoint communication channel, and blocking port of the node towards the non-ERPS device upon receipt of the fault notification and transmitting signal fail notification message on both the ports in the ring.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A protection switching method of a first node having communication failure in a ring network, the communication failure having occurred on at least one of a non-Ethernet Ring Protection Switching (non-ERPS) device, a plurality of nodes, and a communication channel, the method comprising: checking for receipt of a Loss of Signal (LOS) message from at least one of the non-ERPS device and the plurality of nodes in the communication channel of the ring network, the LOS message indicating that a received signal level is lower than a stipulated amount; checking periodically for receipt of Continuity Check Messages (CCMs), the CCMs being separate from the LOS message and periodically transmitted and received among the plurality of nodes through at least one non-ERPS device, transparently; appropriately setting a Remote Defect Indication (RDI) bit in CCMs generated from the first node and transmitting the CCMs through the non-ERPS device or over a disjoint communication channel, the RDI bit being set based on at least one of receipt of the LOS message or non-receipt of the LOS message, and the non-ERPS device being not capable of setting the RDI bit in CCMs; checking for a fault condition based on the received CCMs and receipt or non-receipt of the LOS message; and in the fault condition, blocking a port of the first node connected to the non-ERPS device and transmitting a signal fail notification message on ports of the first node connected to the ring. 2. The protection switching method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising: reverting traffic to a normal state upon recovery from the fault condition using a guard time and wait-to-restore timer. 3. The protection switching method as claimed in claim 1 , comprising setting the RDI=0 in CCMs subsequent to non-receipt of the LOS message and receipt of CCMs from a corresponding bridge/switch. 4. The protection switching method as claimed in claim 1 , comprising setting the RDI=1 in CCMs subsequent to non-receipt of the LOS message and CCMs from a corresponding node, the RDI=1 being an indication sent to a peer node that an error in CCM frames has been detected. 5. The protection switching method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the port of the first node connected to the non-ERPS device is blocked when the non-ERPS device is not in compliance with ERPS standard (G.8032). 6. The protection switching method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a communication channel between the node and the non-ERPS device is a uni-directional link or a bi-directional link, and the non-ERPS device is at least one selected from the group consisting of: an Internet Protocol/Multiprotocol Label Switching (IP/MPLS) router, an Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) switch, a Frame Relay, an Ethernet Switch, and a Resilient Packet Ring (RPR) switch. 7. The protection switching method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the CCM includes a trail of frames or packets and the CCMs are transceived (IEEE 802.1ag) between the plurality of nodes without any modification in the function of the non-ERPS device. 8. A protection switching system of a first node having communication failure in a ring network, the communication failure occurring on at least one of: a non-Ethernet Ring Protection Switching (ERPS) device, a plurality of nodes, and a communication channel, the system comprising: a plurality of nodes interconnected in a ring topology forming the ring network, including a first node; at least one non-ERPS device within the ring, the non-ERPS device being not capable of setting a Remote Defect Indicator (RDI) bit in Continuity Check Messages (CCMs); and a network channel connected to each of the plurality of nodes via at least one of the non-ERPS device for transmitting and receiving CCMs, wherein the first node is configured to: determine a failure condition within the communication channel by: checking for receipt of a Loss of Signal (LOS) message from at least one of the non-ERPS device and the plurality of nodes in the communication channel of the ring network, the LOS message indicating that a received signal level is lower than a stipulated amount, checking periodically for receipt of CCMs, the CCMs being separate from the LOS message and periodically transmitted and received among the plurality of nodes through at least one non-ERPS device, transparently, appropriately set the RDI bit in its CCMs and transmit the same to each of the other plurality of nodes through the non-ERPS device or through a disjoint communication channel, in response to the failure condition, and block a port of the first node connected to the non-ERPS device in the failure condition, and transmit a signal fail notification message on ports of the first node connected to the ring network, in response to the failure condition. 9. The protection switching system as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the first node is further configured to: set the RDI=0 in CCMs subsequent to non-receipt of the LOS message and receipt of CCMs from a corresponding node, and set the RDI=1 in CCMs subsequent to non-receipt of the LOS message and CCMs from a corresponding node, the RDI=1 being an indication sent to a peer node that an error in CCM frames has been detected.
Ring · CPC title
by checking connectivity · CPC title
Ring fault isolation or reconfiguration {(for SDH/SONET ring networks H04J3/085)} · CPC title
Ring · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.